Gem Grab

Deep Diner

54,956 battles collected on this map.

MEDIUM — an average amount of choice: 51 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Emz

Controller 7238 games

Controller 6396 games

Damage Dealer 6086 games

Controller 5238 games

Damage Dealer 4676 games

Damage Dealer 1923 games

Controller 4117 games

Controller 3036 games

Controller 4370 games

Controller 2126 games

Damage Dealer 1912 games

Damage Dealer 4590 games

Damage Dealer 1961 games

Damage Dealer 5125 games

Damage Dealer 2540 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickHow the brawler stands on this map compared to the whole mode (Gem Grab): Strong pick is the top tenth of all map/brawler rows, Good pick the top quarter, Solid the upper half, Rather not the rest. What is measured is the cautiously computed win rate (Wilson lower bound), the same number the cards are sorted by — not the percentage shown beside it. The thresholds come from the field rather than from fixed percentages: the modes sit at different levels, and in Showdown the number counts trophy gains rather than wins. Not to be confused with the tier list — that ranks a brawler by how many maps of the rotation he is usable on, across all maps together. A Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “played badly”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Janet 57.4%Winrate 2,123 games

Moe 57.3%Winrate 1,923 games

Charlie 55.3%Winrate 2,126 games

Clancy 55.3%Winrate 1,912 games

Overrated

Colt 39.5%Winrate 6,253 games

Brock 40.0%Winrate 5,821 games

Nita 46.2%Winrate 5,107 games

Shelly 36.7%Winrate 4,814 games

If you queue as three

three-brawler line-ups that actually exist — counted across the whole mode.

This is for Gem Grab as a whole, not for this map. There are not enough numbers here yet for a map-specific calculation — the calibration needs line-ups actually played on this map. As soon as enough accumulate, the calculation for Deep Diner appears in this spot; until then the mode-wide list is the best available answer.

Out of 135 line-ups with 120+ games.

Bolt

Wendy

75.3% 231 games

8-Bit

Bolt

Wendy

74.6% 142 games

Bolt

Nori

Wendy

74.0% 389 games

Bolt

Emz

Wendy

72.1% 214 games

Bolt

Mortis

Wendy

71.9% 148 games

Bolt

Starr Nova

Wendy

71.6% 192 games

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. three-brawler line-ups that actually exist, counted across the whole mode — not for this map. There is no basis for a map-specific calculation yet: the calibration needs line-ups played on this map. The measured number is therefore not a prediction for Deep Diner, but the answer to what generally wins in Gem Grab.

Measured · in the mode. The strongest three-brawler line-ups in this mode, out of 135 with at least 120 games. The number is deliberately cautious: unchecked, the luckiest outlier would sit on top. Per mode, not per map — on a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a number of its own.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Emz	59.3%	7238	88	2.2%	Strong pick
2	–	Edgar	59.0%	9808	93	3.0%	Strong pick
3	▲ 1	Bolt	59.7%	2729	74	0.8%	Strong pick
4	▼ 1	Bo	58.8%	6396	86	1.9%	Strong pick
5	–	Crow	57.2%	7345	88	2.2%	Strong pick
6	–	Spike	56.6%	6086	86	1.8%	Strong pick
7	▲ 2	Griff	56.6%	5238	83	1.6%	Strong pick
8	▼ 1	Kenji	56.8%	3812	79	1.2%	Strong pick
9	▼ 1	Janet	57.4%	2123	70	0.6%	Strong pick
10	–	Tara	56.4%	4676	82	1.4%	Strong pick
11	–	Moe	57.3%	1923	68	0.6%	Strong pick
12	–	Squeak	55.9%	4117	80	1.2%	Good pick
13	–	Mortis	55.2%	8692	91	2.6%	Good pick
14	▲ 1	Sirius	55.8%	3752	78	1.1%	Good pick
15	▼ 1	Tick	55.5%	4877	82	1.5%	Good pick
16	▲ 2	Sandy	55.4%	3036	75	0.9%	Good pick
17	–	Jessie	54.9%	4370	81	1.3%	Good pick
18	▼ 2	Bibi	54.9%	4510	81	1.4%	Good pick
19	▲ 2	Charlie	55.3%	2126	70	0.6%	Good pick
20	▼ 1	Clancy	55.3%	1912	68	0.6%	Good pick
21	▼ 1	Fang	54.2%	4120	80	1.2%	Good pick
22	▲ 5	Ziggy	55.5%	1346	63	0.4%	Good pick
23	–	Larry & Lawrie	54.4%	2530	72	0.8%	Good pick
24	▼ 2	Starr Nova	54.1%	3270	76	1.0%	Good pick
25	▼ 1	Carl	53.2%	4590	81	1.4%	Good pick
26	–	Mico	53.7%	2572	73	0.8%	Good pick
27	▲ 2	Sprout	54.0%	2061	69	0.6%	Good pick
28	▼ 3	Lumi	54.0%	1961	69	0.6%	Good pick
29	▲ 1	Lily	53.0%	3614	78	1.1%	Good pick
30	▼ 2	Surge	52.7%	5125	83	1.6%	Good pick
31	▲ 1	Jae-Yong	54.1%	1250	62	0.4%	Good pick
32	▲ 1	Nori	52.8%	2946	75	0.9%	Good pick
33	▲ 1	Finx	53.4%	1616	66	0.5%	Good pick
34	▲ 1	Juju	53.5%	1395	64	0.4%	Good pick
35	▼ 4	Damian	52.8%	2232	71	0.7%	Good pick
36	▲ 1	Mina	52.9%	1902	68	0.6%	Good pick
37	▲ 1	Max	52.4%	3112	76	0.9%	Good pick
38	▼ 2	Leon	51.9%	5329	84	1.6%	Good pick
39	▲ 1	Pearl	52.1%	2540	72	0.8%	Solid
40	▲ 1	Penny	51.2%	3968	79	1.2%	Solid
41	▼ 2	Gale	51.4%	3110	75	0.9%	Solid
42	▲ 5	Ash	51.5%	2215	70	0.7%	Solid
43	–	Otis	51.3%	2125	70	0.6%	Solid
44	▲ 2	Kit	50.5%	3635	78	1.1%	Solid
45	▼ 1	Melodie	51.2%	1615	66	0.5%	Solid
46	▼ 1	Dynamike	49.9%	5594	84	1.7%	Solid
47	▼ 5	Amber	50.3%	2485	72	0.8%	Solid
48	▲ 1	Wendy	60.2%	113	26	0.0%	Solid
49	▲ 5	Gigi	50.9%	1364	63	0.4%	Solid
50	▲ 6	Eve	50.7%	1517	65	0.5%	Solid
51	▲ 3	Hank	50.2%	2075	69	0.6%	Solid
52	▼ 3	Colette	49.7%	3578	78	1.1%	Solid
53	▼ 5	Stu	49.4%	4292	80	1.3%	Solid
54	▼ 2	Draco	50.5%	1263	62	0.4%	Solid
55	▼ 5	Lou	49.8%	2056	69	0.6%	Solid
56	▲ 2	Sam	49.7%	1790	67	0.5%	Solid
57	▲ 3	Ruffs	49.6%	1953	69	0.6%	Solid
58	▲ 5	Cordelius	49.0%	3048	75	0.9%	Solid
59	–	Grom	49.0%	2567	73	0.8%	Solid
60	▲ 5	Ollie	49.8%	1201	61	0.4%	Solid
61	▼ 4	Pierce	49.3%	1712	67	0.5%	Solid
62	▲ 2	Frank	48.6%	3055	75	0.9%	Solid
63	▲ 5	Rico	48.2%	6111	86	1.9%	Solid
64	▼ 8	Meg	48.5%	2916	75	0.9%	Solid
65	▲ 1	Berry	48.8%	1867	68	0.6%	Solid
66	▼ 4	8-Bit	48.2%	3803	79	1.2%	Solid
67	▲ 4	Mr. P	48.3%	2780	74	0.8%	Solid
68	▼ 1	Trunk	48.6%	1824	68	0.6%	Solid
69	▼ 8	Shade	48.2%	2901	74	0.9%	Solid
70	▲ 2	Glowy	48.4%	1383	63	0.4%	Solid
71	▲ 2	Meeple	47.5%	2465	72	0.7%	Rather not
72	▲ 5	Chester	47.3%	3384	77	1.0%	Rather not
73	▼ 4	Buzz	47.2%	3236	76	1.0%	Rather not
74	▲ 1	Najia	47.7%	1769	67	0.5%	Rather not
75	▼ 5	Maisie	47.3%	2316	71	0.7%	Rather not
76	▲ 4	R-T	47.9%	1101	60	0.3%	Rather not
77	▼ 1	Darryl	46.7%	3742	78	1.1%	Rather not
78	▲ 1	Kaze	47.0%	2219	70	0.7%	Rather not
79	▼ 5	Lola	47.1%	2029	69	0.6%	Rather not
80	▲ 2	Nita	46.2%	5107	83	1.5%	Rather not
81	–	Pam	46.4%	2881	74	0.9%	Rather not
82	▼ 4	Buster	47.0%	1441	64	0.4%	Rather not
83	▲ 1	Bonnie	46.0%	1979	69	0.6%	Rather not
84	▲ 1	Byron	45.5%	2616	73	0.8%	Rather not
85	▼ 2	Alli	45.7%	1449	64	0.4%	Rather not
86	–	Gray	43.8%	2011	69	0.6%	Rather not
87	▲ 4	Doug	43.0%	1584	65	0.5%	Rather not
88	–	Belle	42.7%	1846	68	0.6%	Rather not
89	▼ 2	Nani	42.6%	2502	72	0.8%	Rather not
90	▼ 1	Gene	42.4%	2448	72	0.7%	Rather not
91	▼ 1	Bea	42.3%	2697	73	0.8%	Rather not
92	–	Willow	42.4%	1899	68	0.6%	Rather not
93	▲ 1	Mandy	40.7%	2105	70	0.6%	Rather not
94	▼ 1	Poco	40.3%	4543	81	1.4%	Rather not
95	▲ 1	Piper	40.4%	2177	70	0.7%	Rather not
96	▲ 2	Brock	40.0%	5821	85	1.8%	Rather not
97	–	Chuck	40.4%	1427	64	0.4%	Rather not
98	▲ 1	Colt	39.5%	6253	86	1.9%	Rather not
99	▼ 4	Gus	39.6%	2570	73	0.8%	Rather not
100	–	Barley	38.5%	4107	80	1.2%	Rather not
101	▲ 2	Jacky	38.2%	2207	70	0.7%	Rather not
102	▼ 1	Bull	37.9%	4210	80	1.3%	Rather not
103	▼ 1	Angelo	37.3%	1238	62	0.4%	Rather not
104	–	Shelly	36.7%	4814	82	1.5%	Rather not
105	▲ 1	Rosa	35.8%	3366	77	1.0%	Rather not
106	▼ 1	El Primo	35.5%	3984	79	1.2%	Rather not