
Heist
64 battles collected on this map.
three-brawler line-ups that actually exist — counted across the whole mode.
This is for Heist as a whole, not for this map. There are not enough numbers here yet for a map-specific calculation — the calibration needs line-ups actually played on this map. As soon as enough accumulate, the calculation for Kaboom Canyon appears in this spot; until then the mode-wide list is the best available answer.
Out of 104 line-ups with 120+ games.
What you see here. three-brawler line-ups that actually exist, counted across the whole mode — not for this map. There is no basis for a map-specific calculation yet: the calibration needs line-ups played on this map. The measured number is therefore not a prediction for Kaboom Canyon, but the answer to what generally wins in Heist.
Measured · in the mode. The strongest three-brawler line-ups in this mode, out of 104 with at least 120 games. The number is deliberately cautious: unchecked, the luckiest outlier would sit on top. Per mode, not per map — on a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a number of its own.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ▲ 1 | Finx |
78.6% | 14 | 0 | 3.5% | Solid | ||
| 2 | ▲ 2 | Colt |
58.8% | 34 | 8 | 8.5% | Solid | ||
| 3 | – | Otis |
80.0% | 10 | 0 | 2.5% | Solid | ||
| 4 | NEW | Meg |
66.7% | 15 | 0 | 3.7% | Solid | ||
| 5 | ▲ 2 | Surge |
57.7% | 26 | 4 | 6.5% | Solid | ||
| 6 | ▼ 5 | Melodie |
61.1% | 18 | 0 | 4.5% | Rather not | ||
| 7 | ▼ 2 | Griff |
58.8% | 17 | 0 | 4.2% | Rather not | ||
| 8 | ▼ 2 | Kaze |
54.2% | 24 | 3 | 6.0% | Rather not | ||
| 9 | ▼ 1 | Chuck |
55.0% | 20 | 0 | 5.0% | Rather not | ||
| 10 | – | Piper |
57.1% | 14 | 0 | 3.5% | Rather not | ||
| 11 | ▼ 2 | 8-Bit |
44.8% | 29 | 6 | 7.2% | Rather not | ||
| 12 | – | Pierce |
43.8% | 16 | 0 | 4.0% | Rather not | ||
| 13 | ▲ 1 | Starr Nova |
28.6% | 14 | 0 | 3.5% | Rather not | ||
| 14 | – | Amber |
20.0% | 10 | 0 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 15 | ▼ 3 | Brock |
31.6% | 19 | 0 | 4.7% | Rather not | ||
| 16 | ▼ 3 | Crow |
23.1% | 13 | 0 | 3.2% | Rather not | ||
| 17 | ▼ 1 | Lola |
16.7% | 12 | 0 | 3.0% | Rather not | ||
| 18 | ▼ 1 | Colette |
15.4% | 13 | 0 | 3.2% | Rather not |