Brawl Ball

Backyard Bowl

59,756 battles collected on this map.

OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 72 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 1802 games

Controller 2702 games

Controller 1127 games

Controller 1980 games

Damage Dealer 2597 games

Damage Dealer 2093 games

Damage Dealer 3321 games

Controller 1146 games

Damage Dealer 2100 games

Controller 1321 games

Controller 10018 games

Damage Dealer 814 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickHow the brawler stands on this map compared to the whole mode (Brawl Ball): Strong pick is the top tenth of all map/brawler rows, Good pick the top quarter, Solid the upper half, Rather not the rest. What is measured is the cautiously computed win rate (Wilson lower bound), the same number the cards are sorted by — not the percentage shown beside it. The thresholds come from the field rather than from fixed percentages: the modes sit at different levels, and in Showdown the number counts trophy gains rather than wins. Not to be confused with the tier list — that ranks a brawler by how many maps of the rotation he is usable on, across all maps together. A Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “played badly”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Pearl 64.8%Winrate 1,802 games

Gigi 65.1%Winrate 1,508 games

Jae-Yong 66.1%Winrate 1,020 games

Glowy 64.1%Winrate 1,108 games

Overrated

Colt 40.7%Winrate 18,428 games

Edgar 31.4%Winrate 15,831 games

Brock 41.9%Winrate 10,300 games

Rico 35.6%Winrate 9,746 games

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 8,262 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 1,422 real line-ups.

69.8% expected

69.8% expected

69.7% expected

69.6% expected

69.6% expected

69.6% expected

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 8,262 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 1,422 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (86 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Bolt	72.5%	4982	83	1.4%	Strong pick
2	–	Nori	69.2%	12570	96	3.5%	Strong pick
3	–	Starr Nova	66.4%	6254	86	1.7%	Strong pick
4	–	Damian	67.4%	2362	71	0.7%	Strong pick
5	–	Pearl	64.8%	1802	67	0.5%	Strong pick
6	–	Gigi	65.1%	1508	65	0.4%	Strong pick
7	–	Otis	63.7%	2702	73	0.8%	Strong pick
8	–	Jae-Yong	66.1%	1020	59	0.3%	Strong pick
9	–	Glowy	64.1%	1108	60	0.3%	Strong pick
10	–	Pierce	60.9%	6057	85	1.7%	Strong pick
11	–	Meg	60.1%	19108	100	5.3%	Strong pick
12	–	Ruffs	62.4%	1495	65	0.4%	Strong pick
13	▲ 2	Wendy	79.9%	149	30	0.0%	Strong pick
14	–	Najia	63.0%	1183	61	0.3%	Strong pick
15	▼ 1	Mina	59.8%	4360	81	1.2%	Good pick
16	▼ 1	Ollie	63.7%	735	54	0.2%	Good pick
17	▲ 1	Finx	62.3%	1097	60	0.3%	Good pick
18	▼ 1	Charlie	62.0%	1127	60	0.3%	Good pick
19	–	Meeple	60.4%	2224	70	0.6%	Good pick
20	–	Ash	62.0%	974	58	0.3%	Good pick
21	–	Lou	60.2%	1980	69	0.6%	Good pick
22	▲ 1	Sirius	60.3%	1662	66	0.5%	Good pick
23	▼ 1	Kaze	59.5%	2713	73	0.8%	Good pick
24	▲ 1	Ziggy	63.1%	642	52	0.2%	Good pick
25	▼ 1	Draco	61.8%	865	56	0.2%	Good pick
26	–	Lumi	59.3%	2597	73	0.7%	Good pick
27	▲ 1	Moe	59.1%	2093	70	0.6%	Good pick
28	▲ 1	Chester	58.4%	3321	76	0.9%	Good pick
29	▼ 2	Sandy	60.3%	1146	61	0.3%	Good pick
30	–	Clancy	59.0%	2100	70	0.6%	Good pick
31	–	Juju	62.5%	405	45	0.1%	Solid
32	–	Stu	55.9%	7485	89	2.1%	Solid
33	▲ 1	Melodie	56.5%	3231	76	0.9%	Solid
34	▲ 1	Amber	57.9%	1321	63	0.4%	Solid
35	▼ 2	Griff	55.5%	10018	93	2.8%	Solid
36	–	Trunk	57.9%	916	57	0.3%	Solid
37	–	Janet	58.1%	797	55	0.2%	Solid
38	–	Doug	57.6%	934	58	0.3%	Solid
39	–	R-T	57.9%	814	55	0.2%	Solid
40	–	Max	54.6%	7146	88	2.0%	Solid
41	–	Buster	57.7%	710	53	0.2%	Solid
42	–	Kenji	53.6%	6419	86	1.8%	Solid
43	–	Maisie	54.8%	1557	65	0.4%	Solid
44	▲ 1	Alli	56.7%	621	51	0.2%	Solid
45	▲ 1	Cordelius	54.8%	1354	63	0.4%	Solid
46	▼ 2	Chuck	57.4%	498	48	0.1%	Solid
47	–	Gray	53.6%	2553	73	0.7%	Solid
48	–	Carl	53.3%	3148	76	0.9%	Solid
49	▲ 3	Eve	55.7%	587	51	0.2%	Solid
50	▼ 1	Bea	52.5%	3868	79	1.1%	Solid
51	▼ 1	Shade	53.6%	1317	63	0.4%	Solid
52	▼ 1	Tara	53.0%	1895	68	0.5%	Solid
53	▲ 3	Willow	54.6%	797	55	0.2%	Solid
54	▼ 1	Bo	52.5%	2711	73	0.8%	Solid
55	▼ 1	Fang	51.6%	7465	89	2.1%	Solid
56	▼ 1	Byron	51.8%	4431	81	1.2%	Solid
57	–	Gale	52.4%	1963	69	0.5%	Solid
58	▲ 1	Spike	51.4%	3802	79	1.1%	Rather not
59	▼ 1	Pam	53.2%	902	57	0.3%	Rather not
60	▲ 1	Hank	53.9%	651	52	0.2%	Rather not
61	▼ 1	Lily	52.8%	1018	59	0.3%	Rather not
62	–	Lola	52.8%	805	55	0.2%	Rather not
63	▲ 1	Buzz	51.2%	2203	70	0.6%	Rather not
64	▼ 1	Sam	52.8%	750	54	0.2%	Rather not
65	–	Kit	51.3%	1479	64	0.4%	Rather not
66	–	Sprout	51.1%	1398	64	0.4%	Rather not
67	–	Bonnie	51.8%	865	56	0.2%	Rather not
68	▲ 1	Surge	49.1%	9633	92	2.7%	Rather not
69	▼ 1	8-Bit	49.4%	5025	83	1.4%	Rather not
70	–	Squeak	50.6%	1254	62	0.3%	Rather not
71	–	Mortis	48.5%	16393	100	4.6%	Rather not
72	–	Belle	50.4%	1179	61	0.3%	Rather not
73	▲ 1	Piper	48.5%	6355	86	1.8%	Rather not
74	▼ 1	Larry & Lawrie	51.0%	627	52	0.2%	Rather not
75	–	Mico	51.3%	538	49	0.2%	Rather not
76	–	Mr. P	50.4%	573	50	0.2%	Rather not
77	–	Mandy	48.4%	2191	70	0.6%	Rather not
78	–	Berry	49.3%	860	56	0.2%	Rather not
79	–	Nani	47.4%	1316	63	0.4%	Rather not
80	–	Gus	46.7%	1565	65	0.4%	Rather not
81	▲ 1	Leon	46.2%	2756	74	0.8%	Rather not
82	▼ 1	Gene	47.3%	776	55	0.2%	Rather not
83	–	Colette	45.6%	3779	78	1.1%	Rather not
84	–	Poco	45.6%	3550	77	1.0%	Rather not
85	▲ 1	Bibi	44.7%	8071	90	2.3%	Rather not
86	▼ 1	Grom	46.4%	567	50	0.2%	Rather not
87	▲ 1	Bull	44.6%	3614	78	1.0%	Rather not
88	▼ 1	Penny	45.3%	1359	63	0.4%	Rather not
89	–	Jessie	43.5%	2132	70	0.6%	Rather not
90	–	Angelo	44.0%	457	47	0.1%	Rather not
91	–	Brock	41.9%	10300	93	2.9%	Rather not
92	–	Tick	42.5%	2459	72	0.7%	Rather not
93	–	Crow	42.0%	7417	88	2.1%	Rather not
94	▲ 1	Darryl	42.1%	2221	70	0.6%	Rather not
95	▼ 1	Jacky	42.2%	1052	59	0.3%	Rather not
96	–	Colt	40.7%	18428	100	5.1%	Rather not
97	–	Emz	37.7%	5131	83	1.4%	Rather not
98	–	Frank	36.6%	6019	85	1.7%	Rather not
99	–	Dynamike	36.1%	4773	82	1.3%	Rather not
100	–	Rico	35.6%	9746	93	2.7%	Rather not
101	–	Rosa	32.0%	1003	59	0.3%	Rather not
102	–	Edgar	31.4%	15831	100	4.4%	Rather not
103	–	Barley	30.1%	1284	62	0.4%	Rather not
104	–	El Primo	27.5%	4916	82	1.4%	Rather not
105	–	Shelly	23.1%	7789	89	2.2%	Rather not
106	–	Nita	22.7%	4827	82	1.3%	Rather not