Brawl Ball

Beach Ball

270,830 battles collected on this map.

OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 69 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 11754 games

Damage Dealer 3388 games

Controller 10063 games

Damage Dealer 11333 games

Controller 7460 games

Damage Dealer 9890 games

Controller 3722 games

Damage Dealer 5797 games

Controller 7619 games

Controller 55704 games

Damage Dealer 18941 games

Damage Dealer 11423 games

Controller 6985 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Brawl Ball): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Wendy 89.0%Winrate 145 games

Ash 64.0%Winrate 8,054 games

Gigi 62.1%Winrate 7,529 games

R-T 61.5%Winrate 3,388 games

Overrated

Edgar 34.2%Winrate 81,646 games

Surge 44.9%Winrate 79,234 games

Mortis 47.7%Winrate 76,908 games

Colt 40.7%Winrate 57,892 games

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 9,130 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 2,121 real line-ups.

72.2% expected

72.2% expected

72.2% expected

72.2% expected

72.1% expected

72.1% expected

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 9,130 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 2,121 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (22 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Bolt	66.8%	11567	95	0.7%	Strong pick
2	–	Nori	65.9%	60376	100	3.7%	Strong pick
3	–	Starr Nova	65.0%	30539	100	1.9%	Strong pick
4	–	Damian	65.1%	15780	100	1.0%	Strong pick
5	▲ 1	Wendy	89.0%	145	30	0.0%	Strong pick
6	▼ 1	Ash	64.0%	8054	90	0.5%	Strong pick
7	–	Gigi	62.1%	7529	89	0.5%	Strong pick
8	–	Lumi	61.4%	11754	95	0.7%	Strong pick
9	–	R-T	61.5%	3388	77	0.2%	Strong pick
10	–	Otis	60.4%	10063	93	0.6%	Strong pick
11	–	Clancy	60.3%	11333	95	0.7%	Strong pick
12	–	Trunk	60.7%	5685	85	0.3%	Strong pick
13	–	Lou	59.5%	7460	89	0.5%	Good pick
14	–	Shade	59.0%	13397	97	0.8%	Good pick
15	–	Sirius	59.0%	9523	92	0.6%	Good pick
16	▲ 1	Glowy	59.6%	3666	78	0.2%	Good pick
17	▼ 1	Ollie	59.7%	3303	76	0.2%	Good pick
18	–	Moe	58.6%	9890	93	0.6%	Good pick
19	–	Charlie	59.2%	3722	78	0.2%	Good pick
20	–	Pearl	58.6%	5797	85	0.4%	Good pick
21	▲ 1	Pierce	57.9%	11192	95	0.7%	Good pick
22	▼ 1	Sandy	58.1%	7619	89	0.5%	Good pick
23	–	Buster	58.6%	4023	79	0.2%	Good pick
24	–	Mina	57.5%	20120	100	1.2%	Good pick
25	–	Griff	57.0%	55704	100	3.4%	Good pick
26	–	Chester	57.2%	18941	100	1.2%	Good pick
27	▲ 1	Doug	57.7%	7839	89	0.5%	Good pick
28	▼ 1	Meg	56.8%	61940	100	3.8%	Good pick
29	–	Jae-Yong	58.3%	3017	75	0.2%	Good pick
30	–	Tara	56.6%	11423	95	0.7%	Good pick
31	–	Kaze	56.5%	12483	96	0.8%	Good pick
32	–	Willow	56.8%	6985	88	0.4%	Good pick
33	–	Meeple	56.6%	7935	90	0.5%	Good pick
34	–	Draco	56.5%	5394	84	0.3%	Good pick
35	–	Najia	56.9%	3200	76	0.2%	Solid
36	–	Ziggy	56.7%	3767	78	0.2%	Solid
37	–	Ruffs	55.9%	5579	84	0.3%	Solid
38	–	Juju	56.8%	2298	71	0.1%	Solid
39	–	Finx	56.3%	3233	76	0.2%	Solid
40	–	Alli	55.6%	4452	81	0.3%	Solid
41	–	Larry & Lawrie	55.5%	4904	82	0.3%	Solid
42	–	Cordelius	54.6%	12507	96	0.8%	Solid
43	–	Stu	54.2%	29179	100	1.8%	Solid
44	–	Maisie	54.9%	7036	88	0.4%	Solid
45	–	Sam	55.2%	4171	80	0.3%	Solid
46	–	Amber	54.9%	4388	81	0.3%	Solid
47	▲ 1	Melodie	54.4%	9812	93	0.6%	Solid
48	▼ 1	Kenji	53.8%	38468	100	2.4%	Solid
49	–	Buzz	53.8%	16843	100	1.0%	Solid
50	–	Jacky	54.0%	7024	88	0.4%	Solid
51	–	Gray	53.5%	8525	91	0.5%	Solid
52	–	Gale	53.1%	9220	92	0.6%	Solid
53	–	Hank	53.3%	4812	82	0.3%	Solid
54	–	Bo	52.6%	9310	92	0.6%	Solid
55	–	Berry	52.4%	7954	90	0.5%	Solid
56	–	Sprout	52.3%	6864	87	0.4%	Solid
57	–	Janet	53.3%	2138	70	0.1%	Solid
58	–	Carl	51.7%	13523	97	0.8%	Solid
59	–	Lily	52.1%	5874	85	0.4%	Solid
60	–	Pam	52.3%	3603	78	0.2%	Solid
61	–	Lola	52.6%	2382	72	0.1%	Solid
62	–	Max	51.0%	22762	100	1.4%	Solid
63	–	Kit	51.3%	8680	91	0.5%	Solid
64	–	Jessie	51.1%	8171	90	0.5%	Rather not
65	–	Bull	50.1%	29102	100	1.8%	Rather not
66	▲ 1	Fang	50.1%	25324	100	1.6%	Rather not
67	▼ 1	Eve	52.1%	1560	65	0.1%	Rather not
68	–	Bea	50.6%	6181	86	0.4%	Rather not
69	–	Grom	50.7%	3671	78	0.2%	Rather not
70	–	Spike	49.5%	17093	100	1.1%	Rather not
71	–	Darryl	49.5%	12393	96	0.8%	Rather not
72	–	Poco	49.0%	25311	100	1.6%	Rather not
73	–	Squeak	49.6%	5009	83	0.3%	Rather not
74	–	Byron	49.2%	7567	89	0.5%	Rather not
75	–	Mico	49.8%	2647	73	0.2%	Rather not
76	–	Mortis	47.7%	76908	100	4.7%	Rather not
77	–	Mr. P	49.3%	2074	69	0.1%	Rather not
78	–	Brock	47.8%	25712	100	1.6%	Rather not
79	–	Bibi	47.5%	57648	100	3.5%	Rather not
80	–	Bonnie	49.1%	2134	70	0.1%	Rather not
81	–	Chuck	49.3%	1265	62	0.1%	Rather not
82	–	Belle	48.5%	2148	70	0.1%	Rather not
83	–	Leon	47.3%	10774	94	0.7%	Rather not
84	–	Penny	47.3%	5243	83	0.3%	Rather not
85	–	Rosa	46.7%	5279	83	0.3%	Rather not
86	–	Tick	45.7%	14420	98	0.9%	Rather not
87	–	Colette	45.7%	12890	97	0.8%	Rather not
88	–	Barley	45.8%	8370	90	0.5%	Rather not
89	–	Emz	45.3%	27784	100	1.7%	Rather not
90	–	Surge	44.9%	79234	100	4.9%	Rather not
91	–	Mandy	45.4%	5797	85	0.4%	Rather not
92	–	Dynamike	44.2%	49860	100	3.1%	Rather not
93	–	Gus	44.9%	3314	76	0.2%	Rather not
94	–	Gene	45.0%	2175	70	0.1%	Rather not
95	–	Crow	43.4%	22562	100	1.4%	Rather not
96	–	Piper	43.8%	4420	81	0.3%	Rather not
97	–	Frank	42.9%	34196	100	2.1%	Rather not
98	–	Nani	42.8%	2825	74	0.2%	Rather not
99	–	Colt	40.7%	57892	100	3.6%	Rather not
100	–	El Primo	39.3%	25230	100	1.6%	Rather not
101	–	Rico	37.7%	47850	100	2.9%	Rather not
102	–	Angelo	38.1%	978	58	0.1%	Rather not
103	–	Nita	36.7%	24657	100	1.5%	Rather not
104	–	8-Bit	36.4%	16299	100	1.0%	Rather not
105	–	Edgar	34.2%	81646	100	5.0%	Rather not
106	–	Shelly	28.7%	39273	100	2.4%	Rather not