Knockout

Belle's Rock

312,378 battles collected on this map.

OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 81 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 7062 games

Artillery 32326 games

Damage Dealer 4680 games

Controller 6533 games

Controller 4141 games

Damage Dealer 5026 games

Damage Dealer 5325 games

Controller 6433 games

Controller 7898 games

Controller 10783 games

Damage Dealer 7912 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Knockout): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Ziggy 65.6%Winrate 9,506 games

Pearl 65.3%Winrate 7,062 games

Gigi 64.2%Winrate 6,723 games

Ruffs 63.5%Winrate 8,741 games

Overrated

Edgar 32.5%Winrate 132,542 games

Brock 46.8%Winrate 106,573 games

Rico 37.0%Winrate 89,636 games

Piper 42.2%Winrate 91,057 games

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 9,804 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 3,622 real line-ups.

67.3% expected

66.5% expected

66.1% expected

65.9% expected

65.7% expected

64.9% expected

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 9,804 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 3,622 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Wendy	75.5%	21913	100	2.2%	Strong pick
2	–	Bolt	68.5%	19668	100	1.0%	Strong pick
3	–	Nori	67.2%	86583	100	4.5%	Strong pick
4	–	Meeple	65.3%	19874	100	0.9%	Strong pick
5	–	Ziggy	65.6%	9506	92	0.4%	Strong pick
6	–	Najia	64.7%	16219	100	0.9%	Strong pick
7	–	Pearl	65.3%	7062	88	0.4%	Strong pick
8	–	Pierce	63.7%	27795	100	1.5%	Strong pick
9	–	Gigi	64.2%	6723	87	0.3%	Strong pick
10	–	Sprout	63.2%	32326	100	1.4%	Strong pick
11	▲ 1	Starr Nova	63.1%	16215	100	0.9%	Strong pick
12	▼ 1	Ruffs	63.5%	8741	91	0.4%	Strong pick
13	–	Gray	62.3%	40401	100	2.1%	Strong pick
14	–	Jae-Yong	63.4%	3547	77	0.2%	Strong pick
15	–	Lumi	63.1%	4680	82	0.2%	Strong pick
16	–	Juju	63.2%	3574	78	0.1%	Strong pick
17	▲ 1	Otis	62.4%	6533	87	0.4%	Strong pick
18	▼ 1	Mina	61.8%	15707	100	0.8%	Strong pick
19	–	Berry	62.0%	7403	88	0.3%	Strong pick
20	▲ 1	Charlie	62.4%	4141	80	0.2%	Strong pick
21	▲ 1	R-T	62.2%	5026	83	0.3%	Strong pick
22	▼ 2	Sirius	61.4%	14344	98	0.4%	Strong pick
23	–	Hank	61.5%	6238	86	0.2%	Good pick
24	–	Shade	61.0%	10283	93	0.5%	Good pick
25	–	Damian	61.7%	3474	77	0.2%	Good pick
26	–	Moe	61.1%	5325	84	0.2%	Good pick
27	–	Ollie	61.9%	2661	73	0.1%	Good pick
28	–	Mico	59.9%	17100	100	0.7%	Good pick
29	–	Glowy	60.5%	4920	82	0.2%	Good pick
30	–	Larry & Lawrie	59.4%	8111	90	0.4%	Good pick
31	–	Ash	60.2%	3049	75	0.2%	Good pick
32	▲ 1	Mr. P	59.2%	6433	86	0.3%	Good pick
33	▼ 1	Willow	59.0%	7898	89	0.3%	Good pick
34	▲ 1	Gene	58.6%	10783	94	0.5%	Good pick
35	▲ 1	Janet	59.0%	5254	83	0.2%	Good pick
36	▲ 1	Belle	58.2%	16498	100	0.9%	Good pick
37	▲ 1	Bonnie	58.8%	6287	86	0.3%	Good pick
38	▼ 4	Buster	59.7%	2612	73	0.1%	Good pick
39	▲ 2	Chester	58.3%	7912	89	0.4%	Good pick
40	–	Gus	57.9%	16079	100	0.9%	Good pick
41	▼ 2	Kit	57.7%	25318	100	0.8%	Good pick
42	–	Lou	58.3%	4842	82	0.2%	Solid
43	▲ 1	Kaze	57.7%	7894	89	0.4%	Solid
44	▲ 2	Doug	57.9%	5169	83	0.3%	Solid
45	▼ 2	Eve	58.3%	3433	77	0.2%	Solid
46	▲ 2	Finx	58.1%	3897	79	0.2%	Solid
47	▲ 1	Clancy	59.4%	1580	65	0.1%	Solid
48	▲ 3	Angelo	57.2%	10092	93	0.5%	Solid
49	▼ 2	Squeak	56.9%	18375	100	0.9%	Solid
50	▼ 5	Penny	57.2%	9538	92	0.5%	Solid
51	▲ 2	Maisie	57.6%	5346	84	0.3%	Solid
52	–	Stu	56.8%	14811	99	0.9%	Solid
53	▼ 2	Mandy	56.4%	49300	100	1.8%	Solid
54	▲ 3	Bo	56.9%	9664	92	0.6%	Solid
55	–	Draco	58.4%	1995	69	0.1%	Solid
56	▼ 2	Griff	56.6%	12777	97	0.7%	Solid
57	▲ 1	Cordelius	57.1%	5850	85	0.4%	Solid
58	▼ 2	Meg	56.5%	12972	97	0.6%	Solid
59	–	Grom	55.9%	19567	100	0.7%	Solid
60	–	Trunk	57.4%	2738	74	0.2%	Solid
61	–	Fang	56.0%	12706	97	0.8%	Solid
62	–	Amber	56.6%	5090	83	0.2%	Solid
63	–	Sandy	57.0%	3266	76	0.2%	Solid
64	–	Nani	55.9%	12005	96	0.6%	Solid
65	–	Lily	55.7%	10048	93	0.4%	Solid
66	–	Max	55.3%	16214	100	1.0%	Solid
67	▲ 1	Alli	55.9%	2809	74	0.1%	Solid
68	▼ 1	Carl	54.6%	14737	99	0.8%	Solid
69	–	Barley	53.9%	11574	95	0.5%	Solid
70	▲ 1	Lola	54.8%	3414	77	0.2%	Solid
71	▼ 1	Melodie	54.5%	3879	79	0.1%	Solid
72	–	Mortis	53.1%	39805	100	1.7%	Solid
73	▲ 1	Buzz	53.6%	6914	87	0.3%	Solid
74	▼ 1	Chuck	54.3%	2858	74	0.1%	Rather not
75	–	Sam	53.9%	2756	74	0.1%	Rather not
76	–	Gale	52.6%	3895	79	0.2%	Rather not
77	–	Tick	51.0%	52298	100	2.3%	Rather not
78	–	Bea	51.3%	15829	100	0.8%	Rather not
79	–	Kenji	51.0%	17489	100	0.8%	Rather not
80	–	Surge	50.9%	19241	100	0.8%	Rather not
81	–	Byron	50.5%	45927	100	2.4%	Rather not
82	–	Bull	49.2%	7344	88	0.4%	Rather not
83	–	Tara	48.9%	6164	86	0.4%	Rather not
84	–	Pam	49.1%	2969	75	0.2%	Rather not
85	–	Colette	47.7%	13533	97	0.8%	Rather not
86	–	Bibi	47.5%	12510	96	0.6%	Rather not
87	–	Brock	46.8%	106573	100	5.7%	Rather not
88	–	Jacky	47.1%	2868	74	0.2%	Rather not
89	–	Jessie	46.5%	7585	89	0.4%	Rather not
90	–	Poco	45.9%	9394	92	0.5%	Rather not
91	–	Spike	44.7%	23507	100	1.3%	Rather not
92	–	Leon	44.2%	29532	100	1.6%	Rather not
93	–	Darryl	44.4%	9426	92	0.6%	Rather not
94	–	Dynamike	42.5%	42383	100	2.1%	Rather not
95	▲ 1	Rosa	43.2%	4533	81	0.3%	Rather not
96	▼ 1	Piper	42.2%	91057	100	4.8%	Rather not
97	–	Frank	39.2%	17434	100	0.9%	Rather not
98	–	Rico	37.0%	89636	100	5.6%	Rather not
99	–	Crow	36.5%	29459	100	1.6%	Rather not
100	–	Nita	35.9%	11463	95	0.8%	Rather not
101	–	Emz	35.0%	26091	100	1.6%	Rather not
102	–	8-Bit	34.5%	34296	100	2.7%	Rather not
103	–	Edgar	32.5%	132542	100	8.2%	Rather not
104	–	Colt	31.2%	69347	100	4.5%	Rather not
105	–	Shelly	26.8%	27153	100	2.0%	Rather not
106	–	El Primo	25.8%	20659	100	1.4%	Rather not