Gem Grab

Bottom Two

46,474 battles collected on this map.

MEDIUM — an average amount of choice: 51 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Controller 5842 games

Damage Dealer 1366 games

Damage Dealer 926 games

Damage Dealer 1503 games

Controller 1373 games

Damage Dealer 574 games

Damage Dealer 1750 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Gem Grab): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Damian 65.4%Winrate 1,168 games

Gigi 65.5%Winrate 916 games

Ruffs 63.3%Winrate 1,291 games

Ziggy 63.5%Winrate 884 games

Overrated

Edgar 44.1%Winrate 9,923 games

Emz 44.2%Winrate 7,502 games

Tick 46.2%Winrate 6,989 games

Rico 46.3%Winrate 6,089 games

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 8,902 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 927 real line-ups.

65.9% expected

65.9% expected

65.9% expected

65.9% expected

65.9% expected

65.9% expected

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 8,902 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 927 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (362 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Wendy	74.9%	4737	82	1.1%	Strong pick
2	–	Bolt	72.2%	8282	90	2.6%	Strong pick
3	–	Nori	66.8%	9508	92	3.2%	Strong pick
4	–	Starr Nova	66.2%	3469	77	1.2%	Strong pick
5	–	Damian	65.4%	1168	61	0.4%	Strong pick
6	–	Gigi	65.5%	916	57	0.3%	Strong pick
7	–	Ruffs	63.3%	1291	62	0.3%	Strong pick
8	–	Sirius	61.8%	2090	70	0.8%	Strong pick
9	–	Bo	60.2%	5842	85	2.0%	Strong pick
10	–	Ziggy	63.5%	884	57	0.3%	Strong pick
11	–	Lumi	62.2%	1366	63	0.4%	Strong pick
12	–	Najia	62.3%	1204	61	0.5%	Strong pick
13	▲ 1	Kaze	61.6%	1434	64	0.5%	Strong pick
14	▼ 1	Moe	62.9%	926	57	0.3%	Strong pick
15	–	Mina	61.3%	1409	64	0.5%	Strong pick
16	–	Chuck	60.9%	1503	65	0.5%	Strong pick
17	–	Finx	62.2%	894	57	0.3%	Strong pick
18	–	Gray	60.7%	1472	64	0.5%	Strong pick
19	▲ 1	Doug	60.9%	1155	61	0.4%	Strong pick
20	▲ 1	Pierce	59.2%	2622	73	0.9%	Strong pick
21	▼ 2	Amber	60.4%	1373	63	0.5%	Strong pick
22	–	Shade	59.5%	1389	63	0.6%	Good pick
23	–	Draco	62.0%	615	51	0.2%	Good pick
24	–	R-T	62.2%	574	50	0.2%	Good pick
25	–	Glowy	59.2%	1177	61	0.4%	Good pick
26	–	Trunk	60.1%	823	56	0.3%	Good pick
27	–	Sprout	58.7%	1388	63	0.5%	Good pick
28	–	Meeple	58.6%	1436	64	0.5%	Good pick
29	–	Sam	62.0%	497	48	0.2%	Good pick
30	–	Chester	58.1%	1750	67	0.6%	Good pick
31	–	Mortis	56.4%	5868	85	2.1%	Good pick
32	–	Hank	60.2%	696	53	0.3%	Good pick
33	–	Kit	58.1%	1455	64	0.5%	Good pick
34	–	Stu	57.1%	2216	70	0.8%	Good pick
35	–	Jae-Yong	59.8%	679	53	0.3%	Good pick
36	–	Janet	58.4%	938	58	0.3%	Good pick
37	–	Juju	60.4%	432	46	0.2%	Good pick
38	–	Gus	55.8%	1637	66	0.7%	Good pick
39	–	Mico	56.9%	802	55	0.3%	Good pick
40	–	Angelo	56.4%	638	52	0.2%	Solid
41	–	Lola	55.7%	803	55	0.3%	Solid
42	–	Mandy	53.7%	1636	66	0.5%	Solid
43	–	Alli	55.2%	493	48	0.1%	Solid
44	–	Willow	53.9%	720	54	0.3%	Solid
45	–	8-Bit	50.9%	7036	88	2.6%	Solid
46	–	Sandy	51.4%	2389	72	0.9%	Solid
47	–	Penny	50.2%	3795	78	1.4%	Solid
48	–	Max	50.0%	3420	77	1.3%	Solid
49	–	Ash	50.6%	1748	67	0.7%	Solid
50	–	Griff	49.6%	5572	84	2.1%	Solid
51	–	Clancy	50.2%	1852	68	0.7%	Solid
52	–	Meg	49.5%	3726	78	1.4%	Solid
53	–	Poco	49.0%	5929	85	1.6%	Solid
54	–	Kenji	48.9%	4109	80	1.3%	Solid
55	–	Jessie	48.8%	4275	80	1.5%	Solid
56	–	Nani	50.4%	855	56	0.3%	Solid
57	–	Lou	48.5%	2124	70	0.7%	Rather not
58	–	Tara	47.8%	2876	74	1.0%	Rather not
59	–	Surge	47.4%	5341	84	1.7%	Rather not
60	–	Charlie	48.0%	1550	65	0.5%	Rather not
61	–	Fang	47.2%	3936	79	1.4%	Rather not
62	–	Spike	47.0%	4066	80	1.5%	Rather not
63	–	Pam	47.1%	2689	73	0.9%	Rather not
64	–	Crow	46.6%	5570	84	1.9%	Rather not
65	–	Rico	46.3%	6089	86	2.4%	Rather not
66	–	Tick	46.2%	6989	88	2.6%	Rather not
67	–	Carl	46.5%	2527	72	0.9%	Rather not
68	–	Otis	46.8%	1772	67	0.7%	Rather not
69	–	Byron	46.1%	3800	78	1.3%	Rather not
70	–	Pearl	45.5%	2284	71	0.9%	Rather not
71	–	Gene	45.6%	1907	68	0.6%	Rather not
72	–	Piper	45.0%	3511	77	1.3%	Rather not
73	–	Emz	44.2%	7502	89	3.0%	Rather not
74	–	Edgar	44.1%	9923	93	4.0%	Rather not
75	–	Mr. P	44.4%	1802	67	0.7%	Rather not
76	–	Brock	43.2%	5750	85	2.2%	Rather not
77	–	Barley	43.6%	2488	72	0.9%	Rather not
78	▲ 1	Squeak	43.1%	3534	77	1.4%	Rather not
79	▼ 1	Gale	43.3%	2086	70	0.8%	Rather not
80	–	Leon	42.6%	3416	77	1.3%	Rather not
81	–	Bibi	42.5%	3423	77	1.4%	Rather not
82	–	Berry	42.7%	2005	69	0.6%	Rather not
83	–	Bea	42.4%	2327	71	0.9%	Rather not
84	–	Belle	42.4%	1885	68	0.7%	Rather not
85	–	Colette	41.6%	3034	75	1.2%	Rather not
86	–	Nita	41.5%	3678	78	1.6%	Rather not
87	–	Colt	41.0%	4819	82	1.8%	Rather not
88	–	Frank	41.2%	2924	75	1.1%	Rather not
89	–	Dynamike	40.7%	4258	80	1.6%	Rather not
90	–	Cordelius	40.7%	1816	67	0.7%	Rather not
91	–	Lily	40.7%	1908	68	0.7%	Rather not
92	–	Darryl	40.6%	2138	70	0.8%	Rather not
93	–	Larry & Lawrie	40.4%	1565	65	0.6%	Rather not
94	–	Grom	39.7%	1535	65	0.6%	Rather not
95	–	Buzz	39.1%	1954	69	0.7%	Rather not
96	–	Maisie	38.9%	1591	65	0.6%	Rather not
97	–	Ollie	37.0%	827	56	0.3%	Rather not
98	–	Bonnie	36.5%	1196	61	0.5%	Rather not
99	–	Jacky	36.5%	1210	61	0.5%	Rather not
100	–	El Primo	36.6%	2721	73	1.1%	Rather not
101	–	Bull	35.7%	2476	72	0.9%	Rather not
102	–	Buster	34.9%	1110	60	0.5%	Rather not
103	–	Eve	34.6%	1427	64	0.6%	Rather not
104	–	Shelly	34.2%	3393	77	1.3%	Rather not
105	–	Melodie	33.7%	1393	63	0.5%	Rather not
106	–	Rosa	33.5%	1786	67	0.7%	Rather not