Gem Grab
Bottom Two
42,538 battles collected on this map.
MEDIUM — an average amount of choice: 50 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
Recommendation
What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean
Hidden gems & traps
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
If you queue as three
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 8,785 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 909 real line-ups.
How these numbers are arrived at
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 8,785 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 909 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (310 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
All brawlers on this map
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
75.2% | 4470 | 81 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Bolt |
71.9% | 7637 | 89 | 2.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Nori |
66.7% | 8709 | 91 | 3.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Starr Nova |
66.3% | 3176 | 76 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Gigi |
65.9% | 858 | 56 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Damian |
64.7% | 1044 | 59 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Ruffs |
63.1% | 1211 | 61 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Bo |
60.2% | 5322 | 84 | 1.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Lumi |
62.6% | 1264 | 62 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Sirius |
61.5% | 1902 | 68 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | Mina |
61.8% | 1278 | 62 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | – | Najia |
62.1% | 1074 | 60 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | – | Ziggy |
62.9% | 830 | 56 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 14 | – | Moe |
62.5% | 842 | 56 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 15 | – | Doug |
61.5% | 1084 | 60 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 16 | – | Finx |
61.9% | 847 | 56 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 17 | – | Kaze |
60.6% | 1294 | 62 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 18 | – | Chuck |
60.5% | 1344 | 63 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 19 | – | R-T |
63.7% | 518 | 49 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 20 | – | Pierce |
59.2% | 2372 | 71 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 21 | – | Gray |
60.2% | 1355 | 63 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 22 | – | Amber |
60.0% | 1231 | 62 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | – | Meeple |
59.6% | 1318 | 63 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | – | Shade |
59.3% | 1247 | 62 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▲ 1 | Sprout |
59.1% | 1287 | 62 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▼ 1 | Glowy |
59.5% | 1064 | 59 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | – | Sam |
62.4% | 457 | 47 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | – | Chester |
58.3% | 1605 | 66 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | – | Draco |
61.2% | 570 | 50 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | – | Mortis |
56.5% | 5348 | 84 | 2.0% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | – | Kit |
57.9% | 1348 | 63 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 32 | – | Juju |
61.8% | 395 | 45 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 33 | – | Janet |
58.5% | 852 | 56 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 34 | – | Stu |
56.5% | 2035 | 69 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 35 | – | Jae-Yong |
59.3% | 616 | 51 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 36 | – | Hank |
59.1% | 621 | 51 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 37 | – | Trunk |
58.4% | 747 | 54 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 38 | – | Gus |
55.7% | 1514 | 65 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 39 | – | Mico |
56.0% | 721 | 54 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 40 | – | Angelo |
56.5% | 588 | 51 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 41 | – |  Lola |
55.6% | 738 | 54 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 42 | – |  Mandy |
53.7% | 1492 | 65 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 43 | – |  Willow |
54.1% | 662 | 52 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 44 | – |  Sandy |
51.9% | 2194 | 70 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 45 | – |  8-Bit |
50.8% | 6454 | 86 | 2.6% | Solid | ||
| 46 | – |  Alli |
54.4% | 450 | 47 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 47 | – |  Ash |
51.1% | 1597 | 66 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 48 | – |  Max |
50.2% | 3161 | 76 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 49 | – |  Penny |
50.1% | 3462 | 77 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 50 | – |  Griff |
49.7% | 5079 | 83 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 51 | – |  Meg |
49.8% | 3370 | 77 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 52 | – |  Clancy |
50.1% | 1668 | 66 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 53 | – |  Poco |
48.8% | 5506 | 84 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 54 | – |  Kenji |
49.0% | 3815 | 79 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 55 | – |  Jessie |
48.5% | 3931 | 79 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 56 | – |  Lou |
48.7% | 1965 | 69 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | – |  Nani |
49.5% | 769 | 55 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | – |  Surge |
47.6% | 4950 | 82 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | – |  Tara |
47.8% | 2665 | 73 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | – |  Pam |
47.6% | 2511 | 72 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – |  Fang |
47.0% | 3601 | 78 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | – |  Charlie |
47.6% | 1382 | 63 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – |  Tick |
46.5% | 6358 | 86 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – |  Otis |
47.3% | 1612 | 66 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | – |  Crow |
46.4% | 5113 | 83 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | – |  Spike |
46.4% | 3721 | 78 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | – |  Rico |
46.0% | 5540 | 84 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | – |  Carl |
46.3% | 2324 | 71 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – |  Byron |
45.9% | 3481 | 77 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | – |  Gene |
45.6% | 1777 | 67 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – |  Pearl |
45.4% | 2064 | 69 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – |  Piper |
44.6% | 3179 | 76 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – |  Edgar |
44.0% | 9023 | 91 | 4.0% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – |  Emz |
44.0% | 6802 | 87 | 3.0% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – |  Mr. P |
44.2% | 1666 | 66 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – |  Brock |
43.4% | 5212 | 83 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – |  Barley |
43.6% | 2265 | 71 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – |  Squeak |
43.3% | 3218 | 76 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – |  Gale |
43.4% | 1886 | 68 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | – |  Leon |
42.8% | 3147 | 76 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – |  Bea |
42.6% | 2132 | 70 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – |  Bibi |
42.4% | 3079 | 75 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – |  Berry |
42.4% | 1865 | 68 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – |  Colette |
42.2% | 2790 | 74 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – |  Nita |
42.1% | 3346 | 77 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – |  Belle |
41.7% | 1723 | 67 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – |  Colt |
41.1% | 4419 | 81 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – |  Frank |
41.1% | 2678 | 73 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 1 |  Lily |
41.3% | 1720 | 67 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 1 |  Darryl |
41.2% | 1973 | 69 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – |  Cordelius |
41.2% | 1637 | 66 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – |  Dynamike |
40.7% | 3928 | 79 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – |  Larry & Lawrie |
40.1% | 1435 | 64 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – |  Buzz |
39.4% | 1794 | 67 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – |  Grom |
39.2% | 1387 | 63 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – |  Maisie |
38.6% | 1462 | 64 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – |  Ollie |
37.3% | 767 | 55 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – |  Jacky |
37.3% | 1102 | 60 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – |  Bonnie |
36.5% | 1087 | 60 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – |  El Primo |
36.2% | 2489 | 72 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – |  Bull |
36.1% | 2270 | 71 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – |  Buster |
35.4% | 1004 | 59 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – |  Eve |
34.9% | 1318 | 63 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – |  Shelly |
34.2% | 3131 | 76 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – |  Melodie |
33.9% | 1285 | 62 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – |  Rosa |
33.0% | 1602 | 66 | 0.7% | Rather not |