Gem Grab

Bottom Two

46,074 battles collected on this map.

MEDIUM — an average amount of choice: 50 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Controller 5803 games

Damage Dealer 1345 games

Damage Dealer 920 games

Damage Dealer 1485 games

Controller 1356 games

Damage Dealer 571 games

Damage Dealer 1728 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Gem Grab): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Damian 65.4%Winrate 1,162 games

Gigi 65.6%Winrate 912 games

Ruffs 63.3%Winrate 1,288 games

Ziggy 63.6%Winrate 881 games

Overrated

Edgar 44.0%Winrate 9,822 games

Emz 44.1%Winrate 7,433 games

Tick 46.3%Winrate 6,934 games

Rico 46.4%Winrate 6,035 games

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 8,902 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 925 real line-ups.

66.0% expected

66.0% expected

66.0% expected

66.0% expected

66.0% expected

66.0% expected

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 8,902 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 925 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (363 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Wendy	74.9%	4703	82	1.1%	Strong pick
2	–	Bolt	72.2%	8219	90	2.6%	Strong pick
3	–	Nori	66.8%	9440	92	3.2%	Strong pick
4	–	Starr Nova	66.1%	3435	77	1.2%	Strong pick
5	–	Damian	65.4%	1162	61	0.4%	Strong pick
6	–	Gigi	65.6%	912	57	0.3%	Strong pick
7	–	Ruffs	63.3%	1288	62	0.3%	Strong pick
8	–	Sirius	61.8%	2079	69	0.8%	Strong pick
9	–	Bo	60.2%	5803	85	2.0%	Strong pick
10	–	Ziggy	63.6%	881	57	0.3%	Strong pick
11	–	Lumi	62.2%	1345	63	0.4%	Strong pick
12	▲ 1	Najia	62.3%	1198	61	0.5%	Strong pick
13	▼ 1	Moe	63.0%	920	57	0.3%	Strong pick
14	–	Kaze	61.6%	1423	64	0.5%	Strong pick
15	–	Mina	61.4%	1400	64	0.5%	Strong pick
16	–	Chuck	61.1%	1485	64	0.5%	Strong pick
17	–	Finx	62.4%	890	57	0.3%	Strong pick
18	–	Gray	60.9%	1464	64	0.5%	Strong pick
19	–	Pierce	59.3%	2602	73	0.9%	Strong pick
20	▲ 1	Doug	60.9%	1140	60	0.4%	Strong pick
21	▼ 1	Amber	60.4%	1356	63	0.5%	Strong pick
22	–	Shade	59.7%	1381	63	0.6%	Good pick
23	–	R-T	62.5%	571	50	0.2%	Good pick
24	–	Draco	61.6%	610	51	0.2%	Good pick
25	–	Meeple	58.8%	1428	64	0.5%	Good pick
26	–	Sprout	58.8%	1371	63	0.5%	Good pick
27	–	Sam	62.0%	495	48	0.2%	Good pick
28	–	Glowy	59.0%	1164	61	0.4%	Good pick
29	–	Trunk	60.0%	819	56	0.3%	Good pick
30	–	Chester	58.1%	1728	67	0.6%	Good pick
31	–	Mortis	56.5%	5821	85	2.1%	Good pick
32	–	Kit	58.2%	1446	64	0.5%	Good pick
33	–	Hank	60.1%	691	53	0.3%	Good pick
34	–	Jae-Yong	59.8%	672	53	0.3%	Good pick
35	–	Stu	56.9%	2196	70	0.8%	Good pick
36	–	Janet	58.6%	933	57	0.3%	Good pick
37	–	Juju	60.5%	428	46	0.2%	Good pick
38	–	Gus	55.8%	1629	66	0.7%	Good pick
39	–	Mico	56.9%	798	55	0.3%	Good pick
40	–	Angelo	56.3%	632	52	0.2%	Solid
41	–	Lola	55.4%	794	55	0.3%	Solid
42	–	Mandy	53.6%	1603	66	0.5%	Solid
43	–	Alli	55.1%	483	48	0.1%	Solid
44	–	Willow	53.8%	715	54	0.3%	Solid
45	–	8-Bit	50.8%	6981	88	2.6%	Solid
46	–	Sandy	51.6%	2368	71	0.9%	Solid
47	–	Penny	50.3%	3776	78	1.4%	Solid
48	–	Max	50.0%	3395	77	1.3%	Solid
49	–	Ash	50.6%	1736	67	0.7%	Solid
50	–	Griff	49.5%	5499	84	2.1%	Solid
51	–	Clancy	50.3%	1836	68	0.7%	Solid
52	–	Meg	49.4%	3705	78	1.4%	Solid
53	–	Poco	49.0%	5894	85	1.6%	Solid
54	–	Jessie	48.8%	4249	80	1.5%	Solid
55	–	Kenji	48.7%	4058	79	1.3%	Solid
56	–	Nani	50.1%	847	56	0.3%	Solid
57	–	Lou	48.6%	2112	70	0.7%	Rather not
58	–	Tara	47.8%	2856	74	1.0%	Rather not
59	–	Surge	47.2%	5305	83	1.7%	Rather not
60	–	Charlie	47.9%	1529	65	0.5%	Rather not
61	–	Fang	47.1%	3894	79	1.3%	Rather not
62	–	Pam	47.3%	2676	73	0.9%	Rather not
63	–	Crow	46.7%	5517	84	1.9%	Rather not
64	–	Spike	46.9%	4024	79	1.5%	Rather not
65	–	Rico	46.4%	6035	85	2.4%	Rather not
66	–	Tick	46.3%	6934	87	2.6%	Rather not
67	–	Carl	46.6%	2503	72	0.9%	Rather not
68	–	Otis	46.8%	1763	67	0.7%	Rather not
69	–	Byron	46.1%	3761	78	1.3%	Rather not
70	–	Gene	45.7%	1890	68	0.6%	Rather not
71	–	Pearl	45.5%	2258	71	0.9%	Rather not
72	–	Piper	44.9%	3473	77	1.2%	Rather not
73	–	Emz	44.1%	7433	89	3.0%	Rather not
74	–	Edgar	44.0%	9822	93	4.0%	Rather not
75	–	Mr. P	44.4%	1787	67	0.7%	Rather not
76	–	Brock	43.2%	5702	85	2.2%	Rather not
77	–	Barley	43.6%	2463	72	0.9%	Rather not
78	–	Squeak	43.1%	3501	77	1.4%	Rather not
79	–	Gale	43.3%	2065	69	0.8%	Rather not
80	–	Bibi	42.6%	3390	77	1.4%	Rather not
81	–	Leon	42.4%	3373	77	1.2%	Rather not
82	–	Berry	42.6%	1990	69	0.6%	Rather not
83	–	Belle	42.5%	1871	68	0.7%	Rather not
84	–	Bea	42.3%	2307	71	0.9%	Rather not
85	–	Nita	41.5%	3644	78	1.6%	Rather not
86	–	Colette	41.5%	3007	75	1.2%	Rather not
87	–	Colt	41.0%	4783	82	1.8%	Rather not
88	–	Frank	41.0%	2887	74	1.1%	Rather not
89	–	Dynamike	40.7%	4229	80	1.6%	Rather not
90	–	Darryl	40.8%	2115	70	0.8%	Rather not
91	–	Cordelius	40.7%	1802	67	0.7%	Rather not
92	–	Larry & Lawrie	40.6%	1553	65	0.6%	Rather not
93	–	Lily	40.5%	1887	68	0.7%	Rather not
94	–	Grom	39.8%	1509	65	0.6%	Rather not
95	–	Buzz	39.3%	1937	68	0.7%	Rather not
96	–	Maisie	39.1%	1574	65	0.6%	Rather not
97	–	Ollie	37.0%	813	55	0.3%	Rather not
98	–	Bonnie	36.7%	1189	61	0.5%	Rather not
99	–	Jacky	36.6%	1202	61	0.5%	Rather not
100	–	El Primo	36.4%	2698	73	1.1%	Rather not
101	–	Bull	35.8%	2452	72	0.9%	Rather not
102	–	Buster	35.0%	1101	60	0.5%	Rather not
103	–	Eve	34.5%	1411	64	0.6%	Rather not
104	–	Shelly	34.3%	3368	77	1.3%	Rather not
105	–	Rosa	33.7%	1766	67	0.7%	Rather not
106	–	Melodie	33.6%	1386	63	0.5%	Rather not