Gem Grab

Bottom Two

42,988 battles collected on this map.

MEDIUM — an average amount of choice: 50 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 1273 games

Trust

Strong pick

62.7%Win rate

Controller 5395 games

Damage Dealer 859 games

Damage Dealer 1358 games

Damage Dealer 520 games

Controller 1248 games

Damage Dealer 1621 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Gem Grab): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Gigi 66.1%Winrate 866 games

Damian 64.7%Winrate 1,051 games

Ruffs 63.1%Winrate 1,220 games

Lumi 62.7%Winrate 1,273 games

Overrated

Edgar 44.0%Winrate 9,112 games

Emz 43.9%Winrate 6,855 games

Tick 46.4%Winrate 6,421 games

Rico 45.9%Winrate 5,606 games

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 8,785 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 911 real line-ups.

66.4% expected

66.4% expected

66.4% expected

66.4% expected

66.4% expected

66.4% expected

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 8,785 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 911 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (321 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Wendy	75.1%	4525	81	1.1%	Strong pick
2	–	Bolt	72.0%	7728	89	2.6%	Strong pick
3	–	Nori	66.7%	8823	91	3.2%	Strong pick
4	–	Starr Nova	66.2%	3228	76	1.2%	Strong pick
5	–	Gigi	66.1%	866	56	0.3%	Strong pick
6	–	Damian	64.7%	1051	59	0.4%	Strong pick
7	–	Ruffs	63.1%	1220	61	0.3%	Strong pick
8	–	Lumi	62.7%	1273	62	0.4%	Strong pick
9	–	Bo	60.1%	5395	84	1.9%	Strong pick
10	–	Sirius	61.3%	1933	68	0.8%	Strong pick
11	–	Ziggy	63.2%	836	56	0.3%	Strong pick
12	–	Mina	61.7%	1297	62	0.5%	Strong pick
13	–	Najia	62.1%	1081	60	0.4%	Strong pick
14	–	Moe	62.7%	859	56	0.3%	Strong pick
15	–	Doug	61.4%	1090	60	0.4%	Strong pick
16	–	Finx	62.0%	858	56	0.3%	Strong pick
17	–	Chuck	60.6%	1358	63	0.5%	Strong pick
18	–	Kaze	60.6%	1304	62	0.5%	Strong pick
19	–	Pierce	59.3%	2404	72	0.8%	Strong pick
20	–	Gray	60.3%	1374	63	0.5%	Strong pick
21	–	R-T	63.5%	520	49	0.2%	Strong pick
22	–	Amber	59.9%	1248	62	0.5%	Good pick
23	–	Meeple	59.5%	1335	63	0.5%	Good pick
24	–	Glowy	59.6%	1076	60	0.3%	Good pick
25	–	Shade	59.1%	1263	62	0.6%	Good pick
26	–	Sam	62.6%	463	47	0.2%	Good pick
27	–	Sprout	59.0%	1299	62	0.5%	Good pick
28	–	Draco	61.3%	574	50	0.2%	Good pick
29	–	Chester	58.2%	1621	66	0.6%	Good pick
30	–	Mortis	56.5%	5408	84	2.0%	Good pick
31	–	Kit	57.8%	1357	63	0.5%	Good pick
32	–	Trunk	58.9%	759	54	0.3%	Good pick
33	–	Juju	61.6%	398	45	0.2%	Good pick
34	–	Janet	58.5%	860	56	0.3%	Good pick
35	–	Stu	56.5%	2043	69	0.8%	Good pick
36	–	Hank	59.3%	626	52	0.2%	Good pick
37	–	Jae-Yong	58.8%	622	51	0.3%	Good pick
38	–	Gus	55.7%	1521	65	0.7%	Good pick
39	–	Mico	56.2%	723	54	0.2%	Solid
40	–	Angelo	56.5%	595	51	0.2%	Solid
41	–	Lola	55.6%	745	54	0.3%	Solid
42	–	Mandy	53.6%	1511	65	0.5%	Solid
43	–	Willow	54.1%	667	52	0.3%	Solid
44	–	Sandy	52.0%	2212	70	0.9%	Solid
45	–	8-Bit	50.9%	6525	87	2.6%	Solid
46	–	Alli	54.9%	457	47	0.1%	Solid
47	–	Ash	51.0%	1613	66	0.8%	Solid
48	–	Penny	50.1%	3504	77	1.4%	Solid
49	–	Max	50.1%	3193	76	1.3%	Solid
50	–	Griff	49.6%	5114	83	2.1%	Solid
51	▲ 1	Meg	49.6%	3410	77	1.4%	Solid
52	▼ 1	Clancy	50.3%	1689	66	0.7%	Solid
53	–	Poco	48.9%	5555	84	1.5%	Solid
54	–	Kenji	49.0%	3846	79	1.3%	Solid
55	–	Jessie	48.7%	3981	79	1.5%	Solid
56	–	Lou	48.7%	1977	69	0.7%	Solid
57	–	Nani	49.5%	777	55	0.3%	Rather not
58	–	Tara	48.1%	2707	73	1.1%	Rather not
59	–	Surge	47.5%	4990	83	1.7%	Rather not
60	–	Pam	47.5%	2529	72	0.9%	Rather not
61	–	Fang	47.0%	3639	78	1.3%	Rather not
62	–	Otis	47.4%	1636	66	0.7%	Rather not
63	–	Charlie	47.5%	1400	64	0.5%	Rather not
64	–	Tick	46.4%	6421	86	2.5%	Rather not
65	–	Crow	46.4%	5166	83	1.9%	Rather not
66	–	Spike	46.5%	3749	78	1.5%	Rather not
67	▲ 1	Carl	46.5%	2343	71	0.9%	Rather not
68	▼ 1	Rico	45.9%	5606	84	2.4%	Rather not
69	–	Byron	46.0%	3521	77	1.3%	Rather not
70	–	Pearl	45.5%	2087	70	0.9%	Rather not
71	–	Gene	45.5%	1793	67	0.6%	Rather not
72	–	Piper	44.5%	3217	76	1.2%	Rather not
73	–	Edgar	44.0%	9112	92	4.0%	Rather not
74	–	Emz	43.9%	6855	87	2.9%	Rather not
75	–	Mr. P	44.2%	1677	66	0.7%	Rather not
76	–	Brock	43.4%	5283	83	2.2%	Rather not
77	–	Barley	43.5%	2285	71	0.9%	Rather not
78	–	Squeak	43.2%	3246	76	1.4%	Rather not
79	–	Gale	43.2%	1912	68	0.8%	Rather not
80	–	Leon	42.8%	3182	76	1.3%	Rather not
81	–	Bea	42.7%	2150	70	0.9%	Rather not
82	–	Bibi	42.4%	3121	76	1.3%	Rather not
83	–	Berry	42.4%	1883	68	0.7%	Rather not
84	–	Colette	42.1%	2817	74	1.2%	Rather not
85	–	Nita	41.9%	3369	77	1.6%	Rather not
86	–	Belle	41.8%	1741	67	0.7%	Rather not
87	▲ 1	Colt	41.0%	4458	81	1.8%	Rather not
88	▼ 1	Frank	41.2%	2712	73	1.1%	Rather not
89	–	Lily	41.2%	1744	67	0.7%	Rather not
90	–	Darryl	41.0%	1991	69	0.8%	Rather not
91	–	Cordelius	41.1%	1661	66	0.7%	Rather not
92	–	Dynamike	40.6%	3971	79	1.7%	Rather not
93	–	Larry & Lawrie	40.3%	1450	64	0.6%	Rather not
94	–	Buzz	39.4%	1814	67	0.7%	Rather not
95	–	Grom	39.2%	1399	64	0.6%	Rather not
96	–	Maisie	38.8%	1475	64	0.7%	Rather not
97	–	Ollie	37.2%	774	55	0.3%	Rather not
98	–	Jacky	37.1%	1112	60	0.5%	Rather not
99	–	Bonnie	36.6%	1101	60	0.5%	Rather not
100	–	Bull	36.2%	2295	71	0.9%	Rather not
101	–	El Primo	36.1%	2509	72	1.1%	Rather not
102	–	Buster	35.6%	1019	59	0.5%	Rather not
103	–	Eve	34.8%	1329	63	0.6%	Rather not
104	–	Shelly	34.3%	3169	76	1.3%	Rather not
105	–	Melodie	34.0%	1295	62	0.6%	Rather not
106	–	Rosa	33.0%	1623	66	0.7%	Rather not