Brawl Ball

Bustling Business

249,883 battles collected on this map.

OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 63 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 10695 games

Damage Dealer 10281 games

Controller 10039 games

Damage Dealer 8139 games

Controller 7964 games

Controller 6849 games

Controller 41485 games

Damage Dealer 6844 games

Damage Dealer 17194 games

Controller 4351 games

Controller 11345 games

Damage Dealer 3736 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pick Good pickHow the brawler stands on this map compared to the whole mode (Brawl Ball): Strong pick is the top tenth of all map/brawler rows, Good pick the top quarter, Solid the upper half, Rather not the rest. What is measured is the cautiously computed win rate (Wilson lower bound), the same number the cards are sorted by — not the percentage shown beside it. The thresholds come from the field rather than from fixed percentages: the modes sit at different levels, and in Showdown the number counts trophy gains rather than wins. Not to be confused with the tier list — that ranks a brawler by how many maps of the rotation he is usable on, across all maps together. A Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “played badly”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Gigi 60.5%Winrate 7,141 games

Moe 58.7%Winrate 8,139 games

Lou 58.2%Winrate 7,964 games

Sandy 57.9%Winrate 6,849 games

Overrated

Edgar 35.8%Winrate 73,001 games

Surge 44.1%Winrate 54,648 games

Rico 39.0%Winrate 47,834 games

Colt 40.3%Winrate 45,345 games

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 9,219 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 1,266 real line-ups.

69.2% expected

69.1% expected

69.1% expected

69.1% expected

69.1% expected

69.0% expected

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 9,219 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 1,266 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (127 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Wendy	76.5%	23262	100	1.6%	Strong pick
2	–	Nori	65.4%	60437	100	4.0%	Strong pick
3	–	Bolt	64.3%	13352	97	0.9%	Strong pick
4	–	Starr Nova	62.3%	25712	100	1.7%	Strong pick
5	–	Damian	62.0%	13969	98	0.9%	Strong pick
6	▲ 1	Ash	60.9%	8498	91	0.6%	Strong pick
7	▼ 1	Gigi	60.5%	7141	88	0.5%	Strong pick
8	–	Sirius	59.3%	9956	93	0.7%	Good pick
9	▲ 1	Lumi	58.8%	10695	94	0.7%	Good pick
10	▼ 1	Clancy	58.8%	10281	93	0.7%	Good pick
11	▲ 1	Otis	58.6%	10039	93	0.7%	Good pick
12	▼ 1	Moe	58.7%	8139	90	0.5%	Good pick
13	▲ 1	Lou	58.2%	7964	90	0.5%	Good pick
14	▲ 2	Sandy	57.9%	6849	87	0.5%	Good pick
15	▼ 2	Griff	56.9%	41485	100	2.8%	Good pick
16	▼ 1	Pierce	57.3%	12254	96	0.8%	Good pick
17	▲ 2	Pearl	57.6%	6844	87	0.5%	Good pick
18	▼ 1	Draco	57.5%	5542	84	0.4%	Good pick
19	▲ 8	Jae-Yong	57.7%	3427	77	0.2%	Good pick
20	▼ 2	Mina	56.5%	15977	100	1.1%	Good pick
21	▲ 5	Trunk	56.9%	6159	86	0.4%	Good pick
22	▼ 1	Ollie	57.3%	3745	78	0.2%	Good pick
23	▲ 6	Kaze	56.4%	10485	94	0.7%	Good pick
24	▲ 1	Chester	56.1%	17194	100	1.1%	Good pick
25	▲ 3	Cordelius	56.3%	11182	95	0.7%	Good pick
26	▼ 2	Meg	56.0%	19773	100	1.3%	Good pick
27	▲ 4	Doug	56.4%	7832	89	0.5%	Good pick
28	▼ 6	Buster	56.8%	4382	81	0.3%	Good pick
29	▼ 6	Melodie	55.9%	13225	97	0.9%	Good pick
30	–	Charlie	56.6%	4351	81	0.3%	Good pick
31	▼ 11	Gale	55.8%	11345	95	0.8%	Solid
32	▲ 2	R-T	56.5%	3736	78	0.2%	Solid
33	▼ 1	Ziggy	56.2%	3472	77	0.2%	Solid
34	▲ 1	Shade	55.2%	10864	94	0.7%	Solid
35	▼ 2	Maisie	55.1%	7927	89	0.5%	Solid
36	–	Finx	55.3%	4161	80	0.3%	Solid
37	▲ 1	Sam	54.9%	5542	84	0.4%	Solid
38	▼ 1	Buzz	54.2%	15813	100	1.1%	Solid
39	–	Sprout	54.4%	6677	87	0.4%	Solid
40	▲ 3	Meeple	54.3%	7381	88	0.5%	Solid
41	▲ 6	Glowy	54.4%	3699	78	0.2%	Solid
42	▲ 9	Alli	54.2%	4368	81	0.3%	Solid
43	▲ 3	Willow	53.9%	6292	86	0.4%	Solid
44	▼ 3	Tara	53.5%	10837	94	0.7%	Solid
45	▼ 5	Jacky	53.6%	8360	90	0.6%	Solid
46	▼ 4	Fang	53.0%	26612	100	1.8%	Solid
47	▼ 3	Kenji	52.9%	32170	100	2.1%	Solid
48	▼ 3	Hank	53.7%	5331	84	0.4%	Solid
49	–	Ruffs	53.5%	5214	83	0.3%	Solid
50	–	Stu	52.7%	23853	100	1.6%	Solid
51	▲ 1	Bo	52.9%	10051	93	0.7%	Solid
52	▼ 4	Spike	52.5%	17513	100	1.2%	Solid
53	▲ 3	Amber	52.4%	5548	84	0.4%	Solid
54	–	Squeak	52.1%	6368	86	0.4%	Solid
55	▼ 2	Larry & Lawrie	52.1%	4289	80	0.3%	Solid
56	▲ 3	Berry	51.7%	5187	83	0.3%	Solid
57	▼ 2	Max	50.9%	23069	100	1.5%	Solid
58	▲ 3	Kit	51.0%	9119	92	0.6%	Solid
59	▲ 1	Carl	50.8%	13705	98	0.9%	Solid
60	▼ 3	Juju	52.0%	2078	69	0.1%	Rather not
61	▲ 1	Gray	50.8%	7921	89	0.5%	Rather not
62	▲ 3	Lily	50.9%	5666	84	0.4%	Rather not
63	▼ 5	Bibi	49.8%	53067	100	3.5%	Rather not
64	▼ 1	Bea	50.1%	7592	89	0.5%	Rather not
65	▼ 1	Bull	49.3%	28106	100	1.9%	Rather not
66	▲ 3	Najia	49.7%	3450	77	0.2%	Rather not
67	▼ 1	Mortis	48.4%	58557	100	3.9%	Rather not
68	▲ 5	Mico	49.1%	3353	77	0.2%	Rather not
69	▲ 1	Leon	47.9%	10575	94	0.7%	Rather not
70	▲ 4	Tick	47.7%	12028	96	0.8%	Rather not
71	▲ 1	Colette	47.6%	15745	100	1.1%	Rather not
72	▼ 4	Darryl	47.5%	16415	100	1.1%	Rather not
73	▲ 2	Byron	47.8%	7623	89	0.5%	Rather not
74	▼ 7	Frank	47.2%	33031	100	2.2%	Rather not
75	▲ 1	8-Bit	47.3%	13990	98	0.9%	Rather not
76	▲ 1	Poco	47.1%	15145	99	1.0%	Rather not
77	▲ 3	Lola	47.7%	3534	77	0.2%	Rather not
78	▲ 3	Janet	47.8%	2767	74	0.2%	Rather not
79	–	Brock	46.6%	24483	100	1.6%	Rather not
80	▼ 9	Emz	46.3%	28737	100	1.9%	Rather not
81	▼ 3	Jessie	46.5%	9505	92	0.6%	Rather not
82	▲ 1	Pam	46.6%	4074	80	0.3%	Rather not
83	▲ 2	Bonnie	46.6%	3081	75	0.2%	Rather not
84	▼ 2	Grom	46.2%	3446	77	0.2%	Rather not
85	▼ 1	Eve	46.2%	2177	70	0.1%	Rather not
86	–	Mandy	45.3%	6368	86	0.4%	Rather not
87	–	Surge	44.1%	54648	100	3.6%	Rather not
88	▲ 2	Belle	44.7%	3207	76	0.2%	Rather not
89	▼ 1	Dynamike	43.5%	28077	100	1.9%	Rather not
90	▼ 1	Crow	43.1%	22042	100	1.5%	Rather not
91	▲ 1	Piper	43.0%	6001	85	0.4%	Rather not
92	▼ 1	Nani	43.1%	4570	81	0.3%	Rather not
93	▲ 2	Gene	43.1%	3044	75	0.2%	Rather not
94	▲ 2	Mr. P	42.7%	2897	74	0.2%	Rather not
95	▼ 1	Penny	42.0%	6646	87	0.4%	Rather not
96	▼ 3	Rosa	41.9%	7199	88	0.5%	Rather not
97	▲ 1	Chuck	42.2%	1852	68	0.1%	Rather not
98	▼ 1	El Primo	40.6%	27062	100	1.8%	Rather not
99	–	Colt	40.3%	45345	100	3.0%	Rather not
100	▲ 1	Gus	40.0%	4973	83	0.3%	Rather not
101	▲ 1	Barley	39.6%	7373	88	0.5%	Rather not
102	▼ 2	Rico	39.0%	47834	100	3.2%	Rather not
103	–	Edgar	35.8%	73001	100	4.9%	Rather not
104	–	Nita	34.5%	27396	100	1.8%	Rather not
105	–	Angelo	32.5%	1641	66	0.1%	Rather not
106	–	Shelly	29.4%	43322	100	2.9%	Rather not