Brawl Hockey

Cabin Fever

72,793 battles collected on this map.

MEDIUM — an average amount of choice: 52 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 1671 games

Damage Dealer 3140 games

Controller 1457 games

Damage Dealer 1320 games

Controller 1419 games

Controller 3199 games

Damage Dealer 747 games

Controller 13064 games

Damage Dealer 637 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Air Hockey): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Damian 63.2%Winrate 2,667 games

Gigi 64.4%Winrate 1,317 games

Finx 62.8%Winrate 1,096 games

Lumi 61.5%Winrate 1,671 games

Overrated

Edgar 44.8%Winrate 19,649 games

Colt 46.5%Winrate 15,716 games

Rico 43.8%Winrate 10,150 games

Emz 47.8%Winrate 8,961 games

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 1,940 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 269 real line-ups.

58.7% expected

58.7% expected

58.7% expected

58.7% expected

58.7% expected

58.7% expected

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 1,940 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 269 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (249 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Wendy	71.8%	3227	76	0.6%	Strong pick
2	–	Bolt	68.5%	6476	86	1.3%	Strong pick
3	–	Nori	63.3%	15719	100	3.5%	Strong pick
4	–	Starr Nova	64.0%	4900	82	0.9%	Strong pick
5	–	Damian	63.2%	2667	73	0.5%	Strong pick
6	–	Gigi	64.4%	1317	63	0.3%	Strong pick
7	–	Finx	62.8%	1096	60	0.2%	Strong pick
8	▲ 1	Lumi	61.5%	1671	66	0.3%	Strong pick
9	▼ 1	Doug	61.3%	1833	68	0.4%	Strong pick
10	–	Draco	62.5%	975	58	0.2%	Strong pick
11	–	Mina	59.5%	3349	77	0.6%	Strong pick
12	–	Jae-Yong	62.9%	744	54	0.2%	Strong pick
13	–	Chester	59.4%	3140	76	0.6%	Strong pick
14	–	Sprout	60.2%	1721	67	0.4%	Good pick
15	▲ 1	Pierce	59.2%	2987	75	0.6%	Good pick
16	▲ 1	Amber	60.4%	1457	64	0.4%	Good pick
17	▼ 2	Kaze	58.8%	3718	78	0.7%	Good pick
18	–	Moe	60.5%	1320	63	0.2%	Good pick
19	–	Willow	60.0%	1419	64	0.3%	Good pick
20	–	Trunk	60.3%	1203	61	0.3%	Good pick
21	–	Meeple	59.2%	1761	67	0.4%	Good pick
22	–	Shade	58.3%	2324	71	0.7%	Good pick
23	–	Sam	59.4%	993	58	0.3%	Good pick
24	–	Bo	57.2%	3199	76	0.8%	Good pick
25	–	Glowy	59.7%	843	56	0.2%	Good pick
26	–	Alli	58.3%	1092	60	0.2%	Good pick
27	–	Sirius	57.2%	1750	67	0.4%	Good pick
28	–	Gray	55.9%	4748	82	0.9%	Good pick
29	–	Ruffs	58.4%	960	58	0.2%	Good pick
30	–	Lola	58.4%	747	54	0.2%	Good pick
31	–	Griff	54.3%	13064	97	3.0%	Good pick
32	–	Stu	54.5%	8666	91	1.9%	Good pick
33	–	Kit	55.4%	2876	74	0.5%	Good pick
34	–	Juju	60.9%	381	44	0.1%	Good pick
35	–	Ziggy	58.8%	571	50	0.1%	Good pick
36	–	Janet	58.6%	555	50	0.2%	Good pick
37	–	R-T	57.0%	637	52	0.1%	Solid
38	–	Gus	54.8%	1335	63	0.3%	Solid
39	–	Hank	55.6%	825	56	0.2%	Solid
40	–	Mandy	53.4%	2770	74	0.5%	Solid
41	–	Bibi	51.8%	14441	98	3.2%	Solid
42	–	Mico	54.0%	1274	62	0.3%	Solid
43	–	Mortis	51.5%	31665	100	6.2%	Solid
44	–	Angelo	56.1%	446	46	0.1%	Solid
45	–	Max	51.1%	7528	89	1.8%	Solid
46	–	Clancy	51.2%	4382	81	0.9%	Solid
47	–	Meg	50.8%	4590	81	1.1%	Solid
48	–	Fang	50.2%	14237	98	3.0%	Solid
49	–	Ash	51.7%	1755	67	0.5%	Solid
50	–	Najia	53.4%	644	52	0.1%	Solid
51	▲ 1	Kenji	49.3%	8532	91	1.8%	Solid
52	–	Frank	49.3%	8354	90	2.0%	Solid
53	▼ 1	Nani	50.9%	1332	63	0.3%	Solid
54	–	Gale	49.6%	4269	80	0.9%	Solid
55	–	Melodie	49.4%	4446	81	0.9%	Solid
56	–	Cordelius	48.7%	3233	76	0.7%	Solid
57	–	Emz	47.8%	8961	91	2.3%	Solid
58	–	Chuck	50.8%	427	46	0.1%	Solid
59	–	Surge	47.3%	8109	90	1.9%	Solid
60	–	Colt	46.5%	15716	100	3.1%	Solid
61	–	Lou	47.3%	2658	73	0.7%	Solid
62	–	Buzz	46.9%	4146	80	0.9%	Solid
63	–	Sandy	46.8%	2303	71	0.6%	Rather not
64	–	Jacky	46.5%	2935	75	0.7%	Rather not
65	–	Bull	46.0%	6215	86	1.5%	Rather not
66	▲ 2	Brock	45.6%	8536	91	2.0%	Rather not
67	▼ 1	Pearl	46.5%	2083	70	0.6%	Rather not
68	▼ 1	Carl	45.9%	4068	80	1.0%	Rather not
69	▲ 1	El Primo	45.4%	6777	87	1.9%	Rather not
70	–	Jessie	45.8%	3121	76	0.9%	Rather not
71	▲ 2	Bea	45.7%	3198	76	0.7%	Rather not
72	▼ 2	Edgar	44.8%	19649	100	4.8%	Rather not
73	▼ 1	Otis	45.4%	2532	72	0.6%	Rather not
74	–	Darryl	45.2%	3729	78	1.0%	Rather not
75	–	Nita	44.6%	4284	80	1.1%	Rather not
76	–	Crow	44.2%	7533	89	1.7%	Rather not
77	–	Ollie	45.0%	1239	62	0.3%	Rather not
78	–	Rico	43.8%	10150	93	2.5%	Rather not
79	–	Colette	43.9%	5036	83	1.1%	Rather not
80	–	Tick	43.3%	6960	88	1.6%	Rather not
81	–	Poco	42.9%	4916	82	1.2%	Rather not
82	–	Charlie	43.2%	1503	65	0.4%	Rather not
83	–	Spike	42.1%	5827	85	1.5%	Rather not
84	–	Tara	42.2%	3884	79	1.0%	Rather not
85	–	Shelly	41.8%	6435	86	1.5%	Rather not
86	–	Leon	41.7%	5022	83	1.1%	Rather not
87	–	Maisie	41.9%	2399	72	0.6%	Rather not
88	–	8-Bit	41.5%	4549	81	1.2%	Rather not
89	–	Squeak	41.6%	2930	75	0.8%	Rather not
90	–	Pam	41.8%	1704	66	0.5%	Rather not
91	–	Dynamike	41.0%	6571	87	1.5%	Rather not
92	–	Byron	40.5%	3042	75	0.7%	Rather not
93	–	Penny	40.1%	2195	70	0.6%	Rather not
94	–	Gene	39.9%	1362	63	0.3%	Rather not
95	▲ 1	Larry & Lawrie	39.5%	1566	65	0.4%	Rather not
96	▼ 1	Rosa	39.3%	1927	68	0.5%	Rather not
97	▲ 1	Buster	39.3%	1374	63	0.3%	Rather not
98	▼ 1	Piper	39.0%	3658	78	0.9%	Rather not
99	–	Belle	37.9%	1448	64	0.4%	Rather not
100	–	Berry	37.7%	1809	67	0.5%	Rather not
101	–	Lily	36.8%	2236	71	0.6%	Rather not
102	–	Grom	36.6%	1655	66	0.5%	Rather not
103	–	Bonnie	36.3%	1261	62	0.4%	Rather not
104	–	Eve	33.8%	1102	60	0.3%	Rather not
105	–	Barley	32.6%	2439	72	0.7%	Rather not
106	–	Mr. P	26.8%	1415	64	0.4%	Rather not