Brawl Hockey

Cabin Fever

71,840 battles collected on this map.

MEDIUM — an average amount of choice: 52 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 1649 games

Damage Dealer 3102 games

Controller 1439 games

Damage Dealer 1303 games

Controller 1408 games

Controller 3163 games

Damage Dealer 727 games

Controller 12862 games

Damage Dealer 633 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Air Hockey): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Damian 63.3%Winrate 2,639 games

Gigi 64.4%Winrate 1,307 games

Finx 63.1%Winrate 1,088 games

Doug 61.3%Winrate 1,799 games

Overrated

Edgar 44.9%Winrate 19,397 games

Colt 46.5%Winrate 15,575 games

Rico 43.8%Winrate 10,022 games

Emz 47.9%Winrate 8,855 games

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 1,926 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 263 real line-ups.

58.9% expected

58.9% expected

58.9% expected

58.9% expected

58.9% expected

58.8% expected

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 1,926 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 263 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (255 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Wendy	71.9%	3200	76	0.6%	Strong pick
2	–	Bolt	68.5%	6414	86	1.4%	Strong pick
3	–	Nori	63.3%	15574	100	3.5%	Strong pick
4	–	Starr Nova	63.9%	4834	82	0.9%	Strong pick
5	–	Damian	63.3%	2639	73	0.5%	Strong pick
6	–	Gigi	64.4%	1307	63	0.3%	Strong pick
7	–	Finx	63.1%	1088	60	0.2%	Strong pick
8	–	Doug	61.3%	1799	67	0.4%	Strong pick
9	–	Lumi	61.4%	1649	66	0.3%	Strong pick
10	–	Draco	62.5%	968	58	0.2%	Strong pick
11	–	Jae-Yong	63.3%	736	54	0.2%	Strong pick
12	–	Mina	59.5%	3315	76	0.6%	Strong pick
13	–	Chester	59.3%	3102	75	0.6%	Strong pick
14	▼ 1	Kaze	58.9%	3670	78	0.7%	Good pick
15	▲ 1	Sprout	60.1%	1702	66	0.4%	Good pick
16	–	Pierce	59.1%	2956	75	0.6%	Good pick
17	–	Amber	60.3%	1439	64	0.4%	Good pick
18	–	Moe	60.5%	1303	62	0.2%	Good pick
19	–	Willow	59.9%	1408	64	0.3%	Good pick
20	–	Trunk	60.3%	1194	61	0.3%	Good pick
21	–	Meeple	59.2%	1740	67	0.4%	Good pick
22	–	Shade	58.2%	2276	71	0.7%	Good pick
23	–	Bo	57.3%	3163	76	0.8%	Good pick
24	–	Sam	59.3%	977	58	0.3%	Good pick
25	–	Glowy	59.6%	837	56	0.2%	Good pick
26	–	Sirius	57.2%	1728	67	0.4%	Good pick
27	–	Gray	55.9%	4702	82	0.9%	Good pick
28	–	Alli	58.2%	1079	60	0.2%	Good pick
29	–	Ruffs	58.2%	948	58	0.2%	Good pick
30	–	Lola	58.5%	727	54	0.2%	Good pick
31	▲ 1	Stu	54.6%	8541	91	1.8%	Good pick
32	▼ 1	Griff	54.3%	12862	97	3.0%	Good pick
33	–	Kit	55.4%	2847	74	0.5%	Good pick
34	–	Ziggy	59.0%	564	50	0.1%	Good pick
35	–	Juju	60.9%	376	44	0.1%	Good pick
36	–	Janet	58.5%	552	50	0.2%	Good pick
37	–	R-T	57.0%	633	52	0.1%	Solid
38	–	Gus	54.7%	1310	63	0.3%	Solid
39	–	Hank	55.8%	816	55	0.2%	Solid
40	–	Mandy	53.4%	2736	74	0.5%	Solid
41	–	Bibi	51.8%	14201	98	3.1%	Solid
42	▲ 1	Mortis	51.5%	31217	100	6.0%	Solid
43	▼ 1	Mico	54.0%	1260	62	0.3%	Solid
44	–	Angelo	55.9%	444	46	0.1%	Solid
45	–	Max	51.1%	7430	89	1.8%	Solid
46	–	Clancy	51.1%	4309	80	0.9%	Solid
47	–	Meg	50.9%	4521	81	1.1%	Solid
48	–	Fang	50.1%	14041	98	2.9%	Solid
49	–	Ash	51.7%	1739	67	0.5%	Solid
50	–	Najia	53.2%	634	52	0.1%	Solid
51	–	Frank	49.5%	8252	90	2.0%	Solid
52	–	Nani	51.1%	1313	63	0.3%	Solid
53	–	Kenji	49.2%	8436	90	1.8%	Solid
54	–	Gale	49.7%	4205	80	0.9%	Solid
55	–	Melodie	49.3%	4387	81	0.9%	Solid
56	–	Emz	47.9%	8855	91	2.4%	Solid
57	–	Cordelius	48.3%	3176	76	0.7%	Solid
58	–	Chuck	50.6%	425	46	0.1%	Solid
59	–	Surge	47.1%	7942	90	1.8%	Solid
60	–	Colt	46.5%	15575	100	3.1%	Solid
61	–	Buzz	46.8%	4100	80	0.9%	Solid
62	–	Lou	47.0%	2628	73	0.7%	Rather not
63	▲ 1	Jacky	46.6%	2900	74	0.7%	Rather not
64	▼ 1	Bull	46.1%	6141	86	1.5%	Rather not
65	–	Sandy	46.6%	2282	71	0.6%	Rather not
66	▲ 1	Brock	45.6%	8435	90	2.1%	Rather not
67	▼ 1	Pearl	46.3%	2051	69	0.6%	Rather not
68	–	Carl	45.8%	4011	79	1.0%	Rather not
69	▲ 1	El Primo	45.4%	6683	87	1.9%	Rather not
70	▼ 1	Edgar	44.9%	19397	100	4.8%	Rather not
71	–	Jessie	45.7%	3068	75	0.9%	Rather not
72	–	Bea	45.6%	3157	76	0.7%	Rather not
73	–	Otis	45.4%	2500	72	0.6%	Rather not
74	–	Darryl	45.1%	3682	78	1.0%	Rather not
75	–	Nita	44.6%	4234	80	1.1%	Rather not
76	–	Crow	44.2%	7410	88	1.6%	Rather not
77	–	Rico	43.8%	10022	93	2.5%	Rather not
78	–	Ollie	45.0%	1231	62	0.3%	Rather not
79	–	Colette	43.9%	4969	83	1.1%	Rather not
80	–	Tick	43.2%	6853	87	1.6%	Rather not
81	–	Poco	42.8%	4859	82	1.2%	Rather not
82	–	Charlie	43.2%	1483	64	0.5%	Rather not
83	▲ 1	Spike	42.0%	5746	85	1.5%	Rather not
84	▼ 1	Tara	42.2%	3836	79	1.0%	Rather not
85	–	Shelly	41.8%	6340	86	1.5%	Rather not
86	–	Maisie	42.1%	2375	71	0.6%	Rather not
87	–	Leon	41.6%	4947	82	1.1%	Rather not
88	▲ 1	8-Bit	41.5%	4450	81	1.1%	Rather not
89	▼ 1	Squeak	41.6%	2899	74	0.8%	Rather not
90	–	Pam	41.8%	1690	66	0.5%	Rather not
91	–	Dynamike	41.0%	6464	86	1.4%	Rather not
92	–	Byron	40.8%	3000	75	0.7%	Rather not
93	–	Penny	40.4%	2167	70	0.6%	Rather not
94	–	Gene	39.9%	1350	63	0.3%	Rather not
95	–	Rosa	39.4%	1904	68	0.6%	Rather not
96	–	Larry & Lawrie	39.4%	1542	65	0.4%	Rather not
97	–	Buster	39.4%	1359	63	0.3%	Rather not
98	–	Piper	38.9%	3590	78	0.8%	Rather not
99	–	Berry	38.0%	1793	67	0.5%	Rather not
100	–	Belle	38.0%	1433	64	0.4%	Rather not
101	–	Lily	36.6%	2206	70	0.6%	Rather not
102	–	Grom	36.6%	1636	66	0.5%	Rather not
103	–	Bonnie	36.0%	1244	62	0.4%	Rather not
104	–	Eve	33.9%	1089	60	0.3%	Rather not
105	–	Barley	32.6%	2417	72	0.7%	Rather not
106	–	Mr. P	26.8%	1394	63	0.4%	Rather not