
Brawl Ball
190,611 battles collected on this map — ranked only.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 35 of 105 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 7,611 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 1,241 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 7,611 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 1,241 real line-ups from a different rank tier, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (2,018 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here. The numbers also come from the solo queue: the battles behind them were fought by three strangers, not a practised team.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Doug |
60.0% | 9970 | 93 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | R-T |
61.9% | 1133 | 60 | 0.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Clancy |
59.3% | 3753 | 78 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Griff |
57.5% | 58091 | 100 | 5.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Jacky |
58.2% | 4435 | 81 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Bull |
56.9% | 39755 | 100 | 4.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Bibi |
56.2% | 46427 | 100 | 4.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Ash |
57.0% | 5019 | 83 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Rico |
54.8% | 52418 | 100 | 5.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Bolt |
55.2% | 7823 | 89 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | Frank |
54.4% | 45833 | 100 | 4.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | – | Gale |
54.8% | 6885 | 87 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | – | Otis |
54.1% | 7935 | 90 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 14 | – | Rosa |
54.6% | 3378 | 77 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | – | Darryl |
53.2% | 7815 | 89 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | – | Tara |
53.3% | 5658 | 84 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | – | Chester |
52.7% | 10169 | 93 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Nita |
52.5% | 10401 | 94 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | – | Sam |
55.3% | 881 | 57 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | – | Damian |
52.4% | 8269 | 90 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | – | Maisie |
53.5% | 2126 | 70 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | – | El Primo |
51.6% | 15052 | 99 | 1.5% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | – | Emz |
50.7% | 43881 | 100 | 4.5% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | – | Surge |
50.7% | 23513 | 100 | 2.4% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | – | Carl |
51.5% | 4822 | 82 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▼ 1 | Buzz |
51.2% | 6782 | 87 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▲ 1 | Moe |
53.2% | 1000 | 59 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | – | Bo |
50.6% | 11622 | 95 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | – | Edgar |
50.0% | 103766 | 100 | 10.5% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | – | Buster |
54.3% | 560 | 50 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 31 | – | Fang |
50.5% | 11246 | 95 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 32 | – | Lumi |
50.1% | 3813 | 79 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 33 | – | Starr Nova |
49.1% | 14336 | 98 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 34 | – | Ruffs |
51.0% | 1309 | 63 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 35 | – | Trunk |
48.5% | 35954 | 100 | 3.7% | Solid | ||
| 36 | – | Shelly |
48.3% | 20068 | 100 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 37 | – | Cordelius |
48.8% | 5780 | 85 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 38 | – | Lou |
49.3% | 2501 | 72 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 39 | – | Gigi |
50.0% | 1259 | 62 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 40 | – | Kenji |
48.3% | 8502 | 91 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 41 | – | Tick |
48.1% | 6051 | 85 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 42 | – | Pearl |
48.6% | 2813 | 74 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 43 | – | Sirius |
48.2% | 3961 | 79 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▼ 1 | Ollie |
51.4% | 354 | 43 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 45 | – | Meg |
47.4% | 5828 | 85 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▲ 1 | Mina |
47.8% | 3144 | 76 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 47 | – | Poco |
47.4% | 3323 | 76 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 48 | – | Colt |
46.2% | 17280 | 100 | 1.8% | Solid | ||
| 49 | – | Stu |
46.1% | 9571 | 92 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 50 | – | Nori |
45.0% | 70610 | 100 | 7.2% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | – | Spike |
45.5% | 9329 | 92 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | – | Dynamike |
45.2% | 8414 | 90 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 1 | Sandy |
45.8% | 1536 | 65 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | – | Colette |
44.8% | 8159 | 90 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 1 | Mortis |
44.4% | 27788 | 100 | 2.8% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▲ 2 | Janet |
47.5% | 303 | 41 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▲ 1 | Draco |
46.1% | 1070 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 1 | Willow |
44.2% | 21466 | 100 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | – | Grom |
45.7% | 1195 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | – | Crow |
44.2% | 9282 | 92 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Charlie |
45.1% | 1340 | 63 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 1 | Max |
44.0% | 8937 | 91 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 1 | Juju |
47.1% | 104 | 25 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | Finx |
45.3% | 459 | 47 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | – | Gray |
44.6% | 1114 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 1 | Alli |
43.7% | 1269 | 62 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | – | Hank |
43.9% | 745 | 54 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 1 | Jessie |
42.8% | 4074 | 80 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 1 | Melodie |
43.1% | 1905 | 68 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 1 | Amber |
43.1% | 1344 | 63 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – | Kit |
42.6% | 2729 | 74 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – | Brock |
41.8% | 15065 | 99 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – | 8-Bit |
41.5% | 7179 | 88 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – | Glowy |
42.3% | 711 | 53 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Shade |
41.5% | 4342 | 80 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Pierce |
41.5% | 1904 | 68 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Meeple |
41.5% | 2148 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Jae-Yong |
41.1% | 270 | 39 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – | Lily |
40.8% | 2273 | 71 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | – | Kaze |
39.5% | 36016 | 100 | 3.7% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – | Najia |
40.1% | 469 | 47 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Ziggy |
38.0% | 245 | 37 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | Lola |
38.7% | 421 | 46 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | Mico |
38.2% | 667 | 52 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 1 | Chuck |
37.1% | 345 | 43 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 2 | Bea |
38.0% | 1459 | 64 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 1 | Berry |
38.0% | 1061 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Mandy |
37.6% | 1006 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | – | Penny |
37.6% | 1606 | 66 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | Nani |
37.0% | 760 | 54 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Pam |
36.8% | 691 | 53 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Gus |
36.9% | 854 | 56 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – | Leon |
36.9% | 3537 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – | Angelo |
30.8% | 143 | 29 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Sprout |
35.3% | 1002 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Mr. P |
32.9% | 516 | 49 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Squeak |
34.0% | 3099 | 75 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Byron |
33.7% | 1945 | 68 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
33.0% | 810 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Belle |
30.3% | 505 | 48 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Barley |
31.4% | 986 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Eve |
22.0% | 381 | 44 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Piper |
25.8% | 1483 | 64 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Bonnie |
22.1% | 453 | 47 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Gene |
21.4% | 636 | 52 | 0.1% | Rather not |