
Bounty
25,657 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 48 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 6,090 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 360 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 6,090 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 360 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (140 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
74.0% | 2508 | 72 | 2.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Bolt |
68.4% | 5019 | 83 | 2.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Nori |
62.2% | 5395 | 84 | 2.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Pierce |
60.9% | 3874 | 79 | 2.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Starr Nova |
61.4% | 1984 | 69 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Mina |
60.9% | 1234 | 62 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 3 | Najia |
58.9% | 1380 | 63 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 1 | Gray |
58.0% | 1895 | 68 | 1.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▼ 1 | Sprout |
59.4% | 872 | 56 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▼ 1 | Kaze |
59.0% | 991 | 58 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | Glowy |
60.9% | 448 | 47 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | – | Ruffs |
58.8% | 737 | 54 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | – | Gigi |
58.8% | 549 | 50 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▼ 1 | Ziggy |
62.1% | 282 | 40 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 1 | Bo |
56.4% | 1196 | 61 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 2 | Kit |
56.0% | 1161 | 61 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▼ 1 | 8-Bit |
54.6% | 2655 | 73 | 2.2% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▼ 1 | Nani |
54.5% | 1861 | 68 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▲ 1 | Mandy |
53.6% | 4071 | 80 | 2.7% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▼ 1 | Carl |
54.8% | 1433 | 64 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 3 | Mico |
58.7% | 375 | 44 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | – | Angelo |
54.6% | 1424 | 64 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▼ 2 | Meeple |
54.9% | 1041 | 59 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▲ 2 | Jae-Yong |
59.4% | 281 | 40 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▲ 1 | Moe |
58.0% | 324 | 42 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 26 | – | Gus |
53.4% | 1749 | 67 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▼ 4 | Sirius |
56.2% | 493 | 48 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▲ 9 | Amber |
56.3% | 478 | 47 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▼ 1 | Piper |
50.9% | 13280 | 97 | 9.3% | Solid | ||
| 30 | – | R-T |
55.9% | 390 | 44 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▼ 3 | Doug |
56.6% | 288 | 40 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 32 | – | Brock |
50.7% | 7372 | 88 | 5.3% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▲ 4 | Lumi |
55.4% | 354 | 43 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▲ 1 | Pearl |
52.7% | 910 | 57 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▼ 2 | Belle |
51.3% | 2306 | 71 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▼ 1 | Mortis |
50.8% | 3336 | 77 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▼ 5 | Lola |
54.8% | 376 | 44 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▼ 2 | Stu |
51.8% | 1014 | 59 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▲ 1 | Finx |
53.9% | 343 | 43 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 1 | Fang |
50.2% | 2211 | 70 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 2 | Willow |
54.4% | 287 | 40 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 1 | Chester |
52.0% | 631 | 52 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▲ 2 | Chuck |
55.7% | 203 | 35 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▼ 2 | Byron |
48.8% | 5528 | 84 | 3.3% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▼ 1 | Lou |
50.6% | 623 | 51 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▲ 1 | Leon |
48.7% | 2199 | 70 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 1 | Max |
48.6% | 2018 | 69 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 2 | Squeak |
48.5% | 1874 | 68 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | ▲ 1 | Juju |
53.8% | 158 | 31 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▲ 3 | Alli |
50.9% | 334 | 42 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▲ 1 | Janet |
49.9% | 475 | 47 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▼ 3 | Bea |
47.5% | 3124 | 76 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 2 | Colt |
46.6% | 7233 | 88 | 3.1% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 1 | Damian |
50.0% | 230 | 37 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▲ 1 | Gene |
47.1% | 1430 | 64 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▲ 1 | Draco |
51.1% | 131 | 28 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | – | Bonnie |
47.2% | 757 | 54 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▲ 3 | Rico |
45.9% | 3037 | 75 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▼ 3 | Maisie |
47.2% | 654 | 52 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 1 | Griff |
45.6% | 1716 | 67 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 2 | Hank |
48.4% | 153 | 30 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 3 | Spike |
45.0% | 1757 | 67 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 1 | Tick |
44.7% | 3016 | 75 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 3 | Kenji |
45.2% | 964 | 58 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 1 | Mr. P |
45.0% | 828 | 56 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 2 | Trunk |
45.6% | 182 | 33 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 1 | Penny |
43.9% | 1197 | 61 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 1 | Crow |
43.4% | 2557 | 73 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▲ 9 | Charlie |
44.0% | 570 | 50 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | – | Jessie |
43.6% | 971 | 58 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 2 | Sam |
43.8% | 162 | 31 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 1 | Buster |
43.6% | 298 | 40 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 1 | Otis |
42.9% | 956 | 58 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 2 | Poco |
42.5% | 1378 | 63 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 2 | Shade |
42.6% | 312 | 41 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 1 | Surge |
42.0% | 1667 | 66 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Meg |
42.1% | 820 | 56 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 4 | Buzz |
41.5% | 732 | 54 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 3 | Lily |
41.3% | 942 | 58 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 1 | Grom |
41.2% | 1146 | 61 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 1 | Edgar |
40.6% | 4604 | 81 | 3.3% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 3 | Tara |
40.5% | 632 | 52 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 7 | Eve |
39.7% | 577 | 50 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▲ 1 | Colette |
39.8% | 1305 | 63 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 3 | Larry & Lawrie |
39.3% | 450 | 47 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – | Gale |
39.5% | 640 | 52 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 1 | Bibi |
39.5% | 747 | 54 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 1 | Emz |
39.4% | 1959 | 69 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 1 | Barley |
38.5% | 784 | 55 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 1 | Cordelius |
38.2% | 581 | 50 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 1 | Pam |
37.5% | 400 | 45 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Darryl |
37.6% | 703 | 53 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 2 | Sandy |
36.6% | 492 | 48 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 1 | Ash |
36.1% | 377 | 44 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Ollie |
33.3% | 183 | 33 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▲ 3 | Nita |
36.7% | 703 | 53 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 3 | Frank |
36.7% | 920 | 57 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 1 | Dynamike |
36.6% | 1658 | 66 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 3 | Clancy |
34.5% | 377 | 44 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 1 | Rosa |
35.0% | 545 | 49 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 1 | Berry |
34.3% | 487 | 48 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 1 | El Primo |
34.6% | 662 | 52 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▲ 1 | Jacky |
33.6% | 551 | 50 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 1 | Melodie |
33.4% | 611 | 51 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Bull |
31.9% | 711 | 53 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Shelly |
30.8% | 1143 | 61 | 0.7% | Rather not |