
Bounty
24,370 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 49 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 5,609 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 355 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 5,609 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 355 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (115 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
73.8% | 2367 | 71 | 2.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Bolt |
68.2% | 4817 | 82 | 2.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Nori |
62.2% | 5164 | 83 | 2.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Pierce |
60.6% | 3690 | 78 | 2.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Starr Nova |
61.4% | 1916 | 68 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Mina |
60.8% | 1186 | 61 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Sprout |
59.7% | 832 | 56 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Kaze |
59.1% | 928 | 57 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▲ 2 | Najia |
58.2% | 1267 | 62 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▼ 1 | Gray |
57.3% | 1802 | 67 | 1.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▼ 1 | Glowy |
61.3% | 429 | 46 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | – | Ruffs |
58.8% | 712 | 53 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | – | Gigi |
59.5% | 521 | 49 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | – | Bo |
56.7% | 1136 | 60 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | – | Ziggy |
62.4% | 271 | 39 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | – | 8-Bit |
54.6% | 2481 | 72 | 2.1% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 1 | Carl |
55.3% | 1382 | 63 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▼ 1 | Nani |
54.6% | 1782 | 67 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▲ 2 | Mandy |
53.6% | 3885 | 79 | 2.7% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | – | Angelo |
54.7% | 1363 | 63 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▼ 2 | Kit |
55.0% | 1083 | 60 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▲ 2 | Jae-Yong |
60.1% | 268 | 39 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | – | Mico |
58.4% | 363 | 43 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▼ 2 | Meeple |
55.0% | 1006 | 59 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | – | Sirius |
56.5% | 457 | 47 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 26 | – | Gus |
53.3% | 1639 | 66 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▲ 11 | Amber |
56.0% | 443 | 46 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 28 | – | Moe |
57.4% | 303 | 41 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▼ 2 | Piper |
51.0% | 12622 | 96 | 9.5% | Solid | ||
| 30 | – | R-T |
56.1% | 376 | 44 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▲ 4 | Lumi |
56.5% | 331 | 42 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 3 | Doug |
57.2% | 278 | 39 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▼ 1 | Pearl |
53.0% | 856 | 56 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▼ 2 | Brock |
50.7% | 7000 | 88 | 5.5% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▼ 3 | Belle |
51.5% | 2161 | 70 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▲ 1 | Mortis |
50.8% | 3204 | 76 | 2.4% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▼ 3 | Lola |
54.8% | 363 | 43 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▼ 2 | Stu |
52.1% | 959 | 58 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▲ 1 | Finx |
54.7% | 331 | 42 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▲ 2 | Willow |
55.0% | 280 | 39 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 3 | Chuck |
56.7% | 194 | 34 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 2 | Chester |
52.4% | 597 | 51 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 2 | Fang |
50.5% | 2083 | 70 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 44 | – | Byron |
48.9% | 5292 | 83 | 3.3% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▼ 2 | Lou |
51.4% | 576 | 50 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 46 | – | Max |
48.6% | 1926 | 68 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 1 | Squeak |
48.6% | 1773 | 67 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | ▼ 1 | Leon |
48.1% | 2061 | 69 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | ▲ 2 | Janet |
50.1% | 453 | 47 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▼ 1 | Bea |
47.4% | 2946 | 75 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▲ 2 | Juju |
52.7% | 150 | 30 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▼ 1 | Colt |
46.8% | 6991 | 88 | 3.1% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | – | Alli |
50.0% | 312 | 41 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 3 | Draco |
52.5% | 120 | 27 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 1 | Damian |
50.2% | 223 | 36 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▲ 2 | Gene |
47.4% | 1379 | 63 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▲ 1 | Bonnie |
47.8% | 720 | 54 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 1 | Maisie |
47.7% | 629 | 52 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 1 | Rico |
45.9% | 2888 | 74 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 1 | Griff |
45.8% | 1612 | 66 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Hank |
48.0% | 148 | 30 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 2 | Tick |
44.8% | 2897 | 74 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▲ 1 | Mr. P |
45.4% | 791 | 55 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 3 | Kenji |
45.2% | 890 | 57 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | – | Penny |
44.2% | 1135 | 60 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | – | Crow |
43.8% | 2441 | 72 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | – | Trunk |
44.9% | 178 | 33 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | – | Spike |
43.7% | 1621 | 66 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▲ 11 | Charlie |
43.6% | 537 | 49 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 2 | Otis |
43.3% | 912 | 57 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 2 | Sam |
43.4% | 152 | 30 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 1 | Poco |
42.8% | 1307 | 63 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 3 | Jessie |
43.0% | 901 | 57 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 1 | Buster |
43.1% | 274 | 39 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 2 | Surge |
42.4% | 1602 | 66 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Shade |
42.2% | 294 | 40 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Meg |
42.2% | 784 | 55 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 4 | Lily |
41.9% | 893 | 57 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – | Buzz |
41.6% | 697 | 53 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 2 | Tara |
41.4% | 597 | 51 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – | Edgar |
40.5% | 4356 | 81 | 3.3% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Grom |
40.9% | 1094 | 60 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | Gale |
40.6% | 599 | 51 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
39.7% | 416 | 45 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 1 | Emz |
39.2% | 1841 | 68 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 1 | Colette |
39.0% | 1204 | 61 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Bibi |
38.8% | 709 | 53 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 1 | Barley |
38.8% | 748 | 54 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 1 | Cordelius |
38.1% | 543 | 49 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | Pam |
37.2% | 384 | 44 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 3 | Eve |
37.7% | 531 | 49 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 2 | Ash |
36.9% | 352 | 43 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 1 | Ollie |
33.9% | 168 | 32 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 2 | Darryl |
37.1% | 665 | 52 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 1 | Sandy |
36.2% | 459 | 47 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▲ 2 | Nita |
36.4% | 654 | 52 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 2 | Frank |
36.4% | 851 | 56 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 1 | Dynamike |
36.4% | 1585 | 65 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 1 | Rosa |
35.0% | 520 | 49 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 1 | Berry |
34.5% | 464 | 47 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Melodie |
34.3% | 575 | 50 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Clancy |
33.0% | 361 | 43 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | El Primo |
34.2% | 617 | 51 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Jacky |
33.4% | 530 | 49 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Bull |
30.9% | 673 | 53 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Shelly |
30.6% | 1091 | 60 | 0.7% | Rather not |