
Knockout
38,746 battles collected on this map.
MEDIUM — an average amount of choice: 49 of 105 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 6,167 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 398 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 6,167 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 398 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (385 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ▲ 1 | Larry & Lawrie |
62.5% | 2117 | 70 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | ▼ 1 | Sirius |
61.7% | 2993 | 75 | 1.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Edgar |
60.5% | 8682 | 91 | 3.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Spike |
60.5% | 2746 | 74 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Grom |
60.5% | 2174 | 70 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Tick |
59.3% | 2876 | 74 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 7 | – | Emz |
58.2% | 2445 | 72 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 8 | ▲ 1 | Sprout |
58.6% | 1873 | 68 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 9 | ▼ 1 | Ziggy |
59.5% | 1124 | 60 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 10 | – | Dynamike |
57.1% | 4706 | 82 | 2.0% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | – | Squeak |
58.1% | 1748 | 67 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | – | Mico |
56.7% | 3126 | 76 | 1.3% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 1 | Juju |
57.2% | 1169 | 61 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 14 | ▼ 1 | Rico |
54.9% | 6512 | 87 | 2.8% | Solid | ||
| 15 | – | Crow |
55.0% | 3963 | 79 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 16 | ▲ 1 | Willow |
55.5% | 1914 | 68 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 17 | ▼ 1 | Berry |
55.6% | 1733 | 67 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 18 | – | Jae-Yong |
56.2% | 1041 | 59 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 19 | – | Meeple |
54.4% | 2186 | 70 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 20 | – | Kit |
52.8% | 4659 | 82 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 21 | ▲ 2 | Leon |
52.0% | 4724 | 82 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 22 | ▲ 2 | Mandy |
52.1% | 3437 | 77 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 23 | ▼ 2 | Hank |
52.8% | 1679 | 66 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 24 | ▲ 4 | Griff |
52.2% | 2380 | 71 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 25 | ▼ 3 | Lily |
51.8% | 3415 | 77 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 26 | ▲ 4 | Otis |
52.5% | 1673 | 66 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▼ 2 | Pierce |
52.4% | 1555 | 65 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▲ 1 | Frank |
51.9% | 2370 | 71 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 29 | ▼ 3 | Bibi |
51.7% | 2523 | 72 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 30 | ▼ 3 | Janet |
52.1% | 1403 | 64 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 31 | ▲ 9 | Bo |
51.3% | 1927 | 68 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 32 | ▲ 7 | Kenji |
51.1% | 2100 | 70 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 33 | ▲ 4 | Piper |
50.8% | 2837 | 74 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 34 | – | Shade |
50.9% | 2437 | 72 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 35 | ▼ 3 | Gray |
51.0% | 2081 | 69 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 36 | ▼ 3 | Ruffs |
51.4% | 1430 | 64 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 37 | ▲ 9 | Najia |
51.1% | 1720 | 67 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 38 | ▼ 4 | R-T |
51.7% | 1076 | 60 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 39 | ▼ 2 | Brock |
50.0% | 4880 | 82 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 40 | ▲ 2 | Bonnie |
50.8% | 1738 | 67 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 41 | ▼ 3 | Pearl |
50.9% | 1484 | 64 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 42 | ▲ 3 | Cordelius |
50.1% | 2647 | 73 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 43 | ▼ 2 | Bea |
50.0% | 2628 | 73 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 44 | ▼ 13 | Moe |
51.2% | 965 | 58 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 45 | ▼ 1 | Maisie |
50.2% | 1863 | 68 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 46 | ▼ 4 | Charlie |
50.4% | 1189 | 61 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 47 | ▲ 2 | Starr Nova |
49.7% | 2029 | 69 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | ▲ 2 | Buster |
50.6% | 1006 | 59 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | ▼ 2 | Lumi |
50.3% | 1168 | 61 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▼ 1 | Finx |
50.0% | 1225 | 62 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▲ 2 | Byron |
49.2% | 2441 | 72 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▼ 1 | Glowy |
49.8% | 1165 | 61 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▲ 2 | Surge |
48.8% | 2713 | 73 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 2 | Colette |
48.6% | 3203 | 76 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 1 | Wendy |
68.3% | 41 | 11 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▼ 1 | Penny |
48.8% | 2057 | 69 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | – | Mr. P |
48.8% | 1726 | 67 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▲ 5 | Lola |
48.9% | 1557 | 65 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 2 | Fang |
48.5% | 2163 | 70 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▲ 6 | Belle |
48.7% | 1895 | 68 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 3 | Buzz |
48.5% | 2020 | 69 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▼ 3 | Nori |
48.3% | 2059 | 69 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Colt |
47.2% | 6118 | 86 | 2.6% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 5 | Ollie |
48.8% | 825 | 56 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 6 | Nani |
47.8% | 2123 | 70 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 4 | Gigi |
48.8% | 845 | 56 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 2 | 8-Bit |
47.6% | 2462 | 72 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 3 | Chester |
47.5% | 2536 | 72 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 1 | Jessie |
47.5% | 2074 | 69 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 2 | Carl |
47.1% | 2242 | 71 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 4 | Gus |
46.8% | 3029 | 75 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 7 | Eve |
47.9% | 884 | 57 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 1 | Barley |
46.6% | 3138 | 76 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 1 | Stu |
46.5% | 2974 | 75 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 6 | Amber |
47.1% | 1374 | 63 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 3 | Mina |
47.0% | 1320 | 63 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▲ 5 | Ash |
46.6% | 1125 | 60 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Angelo |
46.1% | 1741 | 67 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 3 | Darryl |
45.9% | 2189 | 70 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 3 | Mortis |
45.5% | 3596 | 78 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 4 | Max |
45.8% | 2094 | 70 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 2 | Tara |
46.0% | 1614 | 66 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 2 | Clancy |
46.4% | 896 | 57 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | Meg |
45.6% | 1521 | 65 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 3 | Doug |
45.5% | 1424 | 64 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – | Shelly |
44.6% | 4896 | 82 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 4 | Sam |
44.9% | 1299 | 62 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 1 | Damian |
45.0% | 1035 | 59 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | – | Draco |
44.4% | 909 | 57 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | Gale |
43.7% | 1445 | 64 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 3 | Melodie |
43.4% | 1219 | 61 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Bull |
42.7% | 3575 | 78 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – | Kaze |
43.0% | 1902 | 68 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 4 | Alli |
42.5% | 1098 | 60 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 2 | Lou |
42.5% | 987 | 58 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 5 | Sandy |
42.4% | 1140 | 60 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 2 | Trunk |
42.4% | 996 | 58 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 2 | Gene |
42.1% | 1676 | 66 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Nita |
39.9% | 3146 | 76 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▲ 1 | Poco |
39.6% | 3113 | 76 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 1 | Jacky |
39.6% | 1522 | 65 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Pam |
38.5% | 1482 | 64 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▲ 1 | El Primo |
35.7% | 3029 | 75 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 1 | Chuck |
34.9% | 836 | 56 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Bolt |
32.3% | 722 | 54 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Rosa |
28.0% | 1889 | 68 | 0.8% | Rather not |