
Duo Showdown
1,780 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 34 of 83 brawlers above 50%.
Showdown has no win or loss — the API only reports the placement. The percentage here says how often the battle ended with a trophy gain (place 1–2 of 5 teams; from the next place down it costs trophies). It cannot be compared with a win rate — the brawlers can be compared with each other.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest two-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the two brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 720 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 3,561 real line-ups. In Showdown this counts a trophy gain, not a win.
What you see here. The best two-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 720 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 3,561 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
78.6% | 355 | 43 | 2.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Nori |
66.3% | 561 | 50 | 3.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Starr Nova |
74.7% | 194 | 34 | 1.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▲ 4 | Mortis |
62.4% | 237 | 37 | 1.6% | Good pick | ||
| 5 | – | Chester |
67.8% | 118 | 27 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 6 | ▼ 3 | Angelo |
70.8% | 89 | 22 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 5 | Mina |
75.4% | 65 | 18 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 8 | ▼ 4 | Stu |
63.2% | 144 | 30 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 9 | – | Janet |
69.1% | 81 | 21 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 10 | ▼ 3 | Pierce |
68.7% | 83 | 21 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 11 | ▲ 4 | Kaze |
68.8% | 77 | 20 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 12 | – | Finx |
77.8% | 45 | 12 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 13 | ▼ 1 | Kit |
57.1% | 210 | 35 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 14 | ▲ 1 | Bo |
61.4% | 101 | 24 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 15 | ▲ 3 | Meg |
56.4% | 195 | 34 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 16 | ▲ 1 | Alli |
66.1% | 62 | 17 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 17 | – | Max |
54.5% | 220 | 36 | 1.6% | Solid | ||
| 18 | – | Mico |
64.9% | 57 | 16 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 19 | ▼ 3 | Bibi |
52.9% | 238 | 37 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 20 | ▼ 1 | Glowy |
65.3% | 49 | 13 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 21 | ▼ 1 | Meeple |
71.9% | 32 | 7 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 22 | ▼ 2 | Gus |
59.7% | 67 | 18 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 23 | ▲ 3 | Pearl |
55.6% | 108 | 25 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 24 | ▲ 33 | Nani |
57.3% | 75 | 20 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 25 | ▼ 2 | Lumi |
59.6% | 52 | 14 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 26 | – | Najia |
69.2% | 26 | 4 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 27 | ▲ 1 | R-T |
77.8% | 18 | 0 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 28 | ▼ 17 | Doug |
56.9% | 65 | 18 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 29 | ▼ 2 | Edgar |
48.3% | 832 | 56 | 5.7% | Rather not | ||
| 30 | ▲ 3 | Bolt |
57.4% | 61 | 17 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 31 | ▼ 4 | Eve |
54.9% | 82 | 21 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 32 | ▼ 6 | Carl |
52.2% | 136 | 29 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 33 | ▲ 15 | Belle |
53.8% | 93 | 23 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 34 | ▲ 2 | Sprout |
72.2% | 18 | 0 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 35 | ▼ 5 | Ziggy |
78.6% | 14 | 0 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 36 | ▲ 2 | Melodie |
52.7% | 93 | 23 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 37 | ▲ 8 | Sirius |
53.3% | 75 | 20 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 38 | ▲ 3 | Damian |
66.7% | 21 | 1 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 39 | ▼ 9 | Piper |
48.7% | 304 | 41 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 40 | ▼ 2 | Frank |
49.5% | 188 | 34 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 41 | ▲ 14 | Lola |
55.6% | 45 | 12 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 42 | ▲ 11 | Shade |
52.1% | 73 | 19 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 43 | – | Moe |
60.0% | 25 | 3 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 44 | ▲ 13 | Gale |
49.6% | 135 | 29 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 45 | ▲ 4 | Ruffs |
55.0% | 40 | 10 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 46 | ▼ 1 | Buster |
52.6% | 57 | 16 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 47 | ▼ 3 | Squeak |
49.2% | 122 | 27 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | ▲ 10 | Colt |
46.9% | 471 | 47 | 3.3% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | ▲ 3 | Penny |
49.1% | 110 | 26 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▲ 2 | Trunk |
55.6% | 27 | 4 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▼ 10 | Amber |
50.8% | 61 | 17 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▲ 7 | Gigi |
56.0% | 25 | 3 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 9 | Mandy |
49.0% | 98 | 24 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▲ 1 | Poco |
48.6% | 107 | 25 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 2 | Emz |
46.6% | 397 | 45 | 2.7% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▼ 4 | Buzz |
47.8% | 157 | 31 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▼ 2 | Byron |
47.6% | 164 | 31 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 4 | Ash |
48.6% | 74 | 20 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▼ 1 | Leon |
46.4% | 293 | 40 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▲ 12 | Brock |
46.0% | 350 | 43 | 2.6% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 10 | Pam |
47.1% | 87 | 22 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 5 | Gray |
47.8% | 46 | 12 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▲ 3 | Chuck |
50.0% | 10 | 0 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▲ 6 | Hank |
47.1% | 17 | 0 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 6 | Cordelius |
45.6% | 169 | 32 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 1 | Tara |
45.5% | 176 | 33 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 2 | Fang |
44.9% | 187 | 33 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 4 | Sam |
41.7% | 12 | 0 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▲ 5 | Barley |
44.9% | 107 | 25 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 2 | Sandy |
44.9% | 107 | 25 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 5 | Willow |
42.9% | 21 | 1 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 3 | Griff |
44.6% | 267 | 39 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 1 | Bea |
44.6% | 148 | 30 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 1 | Juju |
41.2% | 17 | 0 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 6 | Tick |
44.4% | 108 | 25 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▲ 1 | Jessie |
43.9% | 107 | 25 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▲ 6 | Rico |
44.0% | 327 | 42 | 2.3% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 8 | Kenji |
43.9% | 171 | 32 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 6 | Jacky |
43.1% | 72 | 19 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 6 | Nita |
43.8% | 208 | 35 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 5 | Surge |
43.6% | 351 | 43 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 8 | Grom |
42.0% | 69 | 19 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 2 | Draco |
36.4% | 22 | 1 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | Colette |
43.2% | 185 | 33 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 2 | Spike |
42.9% | 275 | 39 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 8 | Dynamike |
42.3% | 168 | 32 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 15 | Bonnie |
38.0% | 50 | 14 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Berry |
38.9% | 72 | 19 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 7 | Shelly |
42.0% | 410 | 45 | 2.9% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 10 | El Primo |
40.8% | 169 | 32 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Otis |
40.0% | 120 | 27 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 7 | Maisie |
38.6% | 101 | 24 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – | Crow |
40.8% | 331 | 42 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 3 | Lou |
36.7% | 79 | 21 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Mr. P |
36.7% | 79 | 21 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 5 | 8-Bit |
40.0% | 215 | 36 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 4 | Clancy |
32.7% | 49 | 13 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▲ 2 | Darryl |
37.7% | 122 | 27 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▼ 3 | Rosa |
34.7% | 75 | 20 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Gene |
30.9% | 55 | 15 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 2 | Ollie |
28.3% | 46 | 12 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 1 | Bull |
36.8% | 155 | 31 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 8 | Lily |
35.5% | 121 | 27 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
31.8% | 88 | 22 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Charlie |
26.1% | 88 | 22 | 0.6% | Rather not |