
Duo Showdown
1,722 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 33 of 83 brawlers above 50%.
Showdown has no win or loss — the API only reports the placement. The percentage here says how often the battle ended with a trophy gain (place 1–2 of 5 teams; from the next place down it costs trophies). It cannot be compared with a win rate — the brawlers can be compared with each other.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest two-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the two brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 721 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 3,557 real line-ups. In Showdown this counts a trophy gain, not a win.
What you see here. The best two-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 721 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 3,557 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
78.6% | 345 | 43 | 2.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Starr Nova |
75.9% | 191 | 34 | 1.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Nori |
65.9% | 540 | 49 | 3.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▲ 6 | Mortis |
62.3% | 236 | 37 | 1.7% | Good pick | ||
| 5 | – | Chester |
68.4% | 117 | 26 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 6 | ▼ 4 | Angelo |
70.6% | 85 | 22 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 7 | ▲ 3 | Mina |
76.2% | 63 | 17 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 8 | ▼ 3 | Stu |
63.8% | 141 | 29 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 9 | – | Janet |
69.1% | 81 | 21 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 10 | ▼ 3 | Pierce |
68.7% | 83 | 21 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 11 | ▲ 3 | Kaze |
69.7% | 76 | 20 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 12 | – | Finx |
79.5% | 44 | 12 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 13 | ▼ 1 | Kit |
57.2% | 208 | 35 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 14 | – | Bo |
61.9% | 97 | 24 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 15 | ▲ 2 | Meg |
55.9% | 186 | 33 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 16 | ▼ 2 | Max |
54.8% | 217 | 36 | 1.6% | Solid | ||
| 17 | – | Alli |
65.6% | 61 | 17 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 18 | – | Mico |
65.5% | 55 | 15 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 19 | ▼ 2 | Meeple |
71.9% | 32 | 7 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 20 | ▼ 2 | Bibi |
52.0% | 229 | 36 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 21 | ▼ 1 | Edgar |
49.2% | 809 | 55 | 5.8% | Solid | ||
| 22 | – | Glowy |
63.0% | 46 | 12 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 23 | ▲ 22 | Nani |
57.5% | 73 | 19 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 24 | ▼ 1 | Lumi |
60.8% | 51 | 14 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 25 | ▲ 4 | Pearl |
54.9% | 102 | 24 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 26 | ▲ 1 | Najia |
69.2% | 26 | 4 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 27 | ▼ 1 | R-T |
77.8% | 18 | 0 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 28 | ▲ 2 | Carl |
52.6% | 133 | 28 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 29 | ▲ 3 | Bolt |
57.4% | 61 | 17 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 30 | – | Gus |
57.6% | 59 | 16 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 31 | ▲ 2 | Eve |
55.1% | 78 | 20 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 32 | ▼ 23 | Doug |
55.9% | 59 | 16 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 33 | ▼ 1 | Ziggy |
83.3% | 12 | 0 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 34 | ▼ 2 | Frank |
50.3% | 179 | 33 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 35 | ▼ 1 | Melodie |
52.7% | 91 | 23 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 36 | ▲ 6 | Belle |
52.8% | 89 | 22 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 37 | ▲ 4 | Damian |
66.7% | 21 | 1 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 38 | ▼ 5 | Piper |
48.8% | 297 | 40 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 39 | ▼ 3 | Sprout |
68.8% | 16 | 0 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 40 | ▲ 9 | Sirius |
52.1% | 73 | 19 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 41 | ▲ 2 | Moe |
60.0% | 25 | 3 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 42 | ▲ 12 | Colt |
47.4% | 456 | 47 | 3.3% | Rather not | ||
| 43 | ▲ 1 | Buster |
52.6% | 57 | 16 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 44 | ▲ 2 | Gale |
49.3% | 134 | 28 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 45 | – | Penny |
50.0% | 100 | 24 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 46 | ▲ 18 | Lola |
53.5% | 43 | 11 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 47 | ▼ 12 | Amber |
51.7% | 60 | 16 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | ▼ 4 | Ruffs |
53.8% | 39 | 10 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | ▼ 4 | Mandy |
49.5% | 95 | 23 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | – | Trunk |
55.6% | 27 | 4 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▲ 10 | Gigi |
56.0% | 25 | 3 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▼ 2 | Ash |
50.0% | 70 | 19 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▲ 7 | Shade |
50.0% | 68 | 18 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 4 | Squeak |
48.3% | 118 | 27 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▲ 2 | Poco |
48.1% | 104 | 25 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▼ 6 | Emz |
46.1% | 384 | 44 | 2.7% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▲ 14 | Brock |
46.1% | 336 | 42 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▲ 10 | Gray |
48.9% | 45 | 12 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▼ 5 | Buzz |
46.7% | 150 | 30 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 2 | Leon |
46.0% | 285 | 40 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 1 | Byron |
46.2% | 158 | 31 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 6 | Hank |
47.1% | 17 | 0 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▲ 3 | Griff |
45.3% | 258 | 38 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▲ 8 | Bea |
45.5% | 145 | 30 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▲ 6 | Barley |
45.3% | 106 | 25 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 8 | Pam |
45.2% | 84 | 21 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 1 | Fang |
45.1% | 182 | 33 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 2 | Sandy |
45.1% | 102 | 24 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▲ 9 | Rico |
44.6% | 316 | 41 | 2.3% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 4 | Willow |
42.9% | 21 | 1 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – | Jessie |
44.6% | 101 | 24 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 2 | Juju |
41.2% | 17 | 0 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 1 | Cordelius |
44.4% | 160 | 31 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 5 | Tara |
44.3% | 167 | 32 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 2 | Sam |
36.4% | 11 | 0 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 2 | Surge |
44.0% | 339 | 42 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 4 | Jacky |
42.9% | 70 | 19 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 3 | Kenji |
43.6% | 165 | 32 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 6 | Nita |
43.4% | 198 | 34 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 2 | Draco |
36.4% | 22 | 1 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 3 | Colette |
42.7% | 178 | 33 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 1 | Tick |
41.8% | 98 | 24 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 5 | Grom |
40.3% | 67 | 18 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | Berry |
40.0% | 70 | 19 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 2 | Spike |
42.4% | 262 | 38 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 4 | Shelly |
42.4% | 403 | 45 | 2.9% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 14 | Bonnie |
37.5% | 48 | 13 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 5 | Dynamike |
41.6% | 161 | 31 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 5 | El Primo |
41.5% | 159 | 31 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 1 | Otis |
40.2% | 117 | 26 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 3 | Darryl |
39.7% | 116 | 26 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 9 | Maisie |
38.5% | 96 | 23 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 1 | Lou |
37.2% | 78 | 20 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – | Crow |
40.8% | 326 | 42 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 2 | Mr. P |
36.5% | 74 | 20 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 3 | 8-Bit |
40.1% | 212 | 35 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 7 | Clancy |
32.7% | 49 | 13 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 1 | Rosa |
35.2% | 71 | 19 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▼ 1 | Ollie |
28.9% | 45 | 12 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 1 | Gene |
28.3% | 53 | 15 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 12 | Lily |
35.3% | 119 | 27 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 4 | Bull |
35.6% | 149 | 30 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
31.4% | 86 | 22 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 1 | Charlie |
24.4% | 82 | 21 | 0.6% | Rather not |