Gem Grab

Deep Diner

54,901 battles collected on this map.

MEDIUM — an average amount of choice: 51 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Emz

Controller 7230 games

Controller 6388 games

Damage Dealer 6075 games

Controller 5233 games

Damage Dealer 4668 games

Damage Dealer 1922 games

Controller 4116 games

Controller 3032 games

Controller 4365 games

Controller 2124 games

Damage Dealer 1909 games

Damage Dealer 4586 games

Damage Dealer 1959 games

Damage Dealer 5120 games

Damage Dealer 2539 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickHow the brawler stands on this map compared to the whole mode (Gem Grab): Strong pick is the top tenth of all map/brawler rows, Good pick the top quarter, Solid the upper half, Rather not the rest. What is measured is the cautiously computed win rate (Wilson lower bound), the same number the cards are sorted by — not the percentage shown beside it. The thresholds come from the field rather than from fixed percentages: the modes sit at different levels, and in Showdown the number counts trophy gains rather than wins. Not to be confused with the tier list — that ranks a brawler by how many maps of the rotation he is usable on, across all maps together. A Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “played badly”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Janet 57.3%Winrate 2,121 games

Moe 57.2%Winrate 1,922 games

Charlie 55.4%Winrate 2,124 games

Clancy 55.3%Winrate 1,909 games

Overrated

Colt 39.5%Winrate 6,247 games

Brock 40.0%Winrate 5,815 games

Nita 46.2%Winrate 5,102 games

Shelly 36.7%Winrate 4,809 games

If you queue as three

three-brawler line-ups that actually exist — counted across the whole mode.

This is for Gem Grab as a whole, not for this map. There are not enough numbers here yet for a map-specific calculation — the calibration needs line-ups actually played on this map. As soon as enough accumulate, the calculation for Deep Diner appears in this spot; until then the mode-wide list is the best available answer.

Out of 118 line-ups with 120+ games.

Bolt

Wendy

76.2% 216 games

Bolt

Nori

Wendy

74.2% 330 games

Bolt

Emz

Wendy

71.1% 199 games

Bolt

Surge

Wendy

70.8% 156 games

Bolt

Mortis

Wendy

70.8% 125 games

Starr Nova

Wendy

70.8% 142 games

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. three-brawler line-ups that actually exist, counted across the whole mode — not for this map. There is no basis for a map-specific calculation yet: the calibration needs line-ups played on this map. The measured number is therefore not a prediction for Deep Diner, but the answer to what generally wins in Gem Grab.

Measured · in the mode. The strongest three-brawler line-ups in this mode, out of 118 with at least 120 games. The number is deliberately cautious: unchecked, the luckiest outlier would sit on top. Per mode, not per map — on a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a number of its own.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Emz	59.3%	7230	88	2.2%	Strong pick
2	–	Edgar	59.0%	9800	93	3.0%	Strong pick
3	–	Bolt	59.7%	2726	74	0.8%	Strong pick
4	–	Bo	58.8%	6388	86	1.9%	Strong pick
5	–	Crow	57.2%	7332	88	2.2%	Strong pick
6	–	Spike	56.7%	6075	86	1.8%	Strong pick
7	▲ 2	Griff	56.6%	5233	83	1.6%	Strong pick
8	▼ 1	Kenji	56.8%	3811	79	1.2%	Strong pick
9	▼ 2	Janet	57.3%	2121	70	0.6%	Strong pick
10	▲ 1	Tara	56.4%	4668	82	1.4%	Strong pick
11	▲ 1	Moe	57.2%	1922	68	0.6%	Strong pick
12	▼ 1	Squeak	55.9%	4116	80	1.2%	Good pick
13	–	Mortis	55.2%	8679	91	2.6%	Good pick
14	▲ 1	Sirius	55.8%	3748	78	1.1%	Good pick
15	▼ 1	Tick	55.5%	4872	82	1.5%	Good pick
16	▲ 2	Sandy	55.4%	3032	75	0.9%	Good pick
17	–	Jessie	54.9%	4365	81	1.3%	Good pick
18	▼ 2	Bibi	54.8%	4509	81	1.4%	Good pick
19	▲ 2	Charlie	55.4%	2124	70	0.6%	Good pick
20	▼ 1	Clancy	55.3%	1909	68	0.6%	Good pick
21	▼ 1	Fang	54.1%	4117	80	1.2%	Good pick
22	▲ 5	Ziggy	55.5%	1346	63	0.4%	Good pick
23	▼ 1	Starr Nova	54.2%	3268	76	1.0%	Good pick
24	▼ 1	Larry & Lawrie	54.4%	2529	72	0.8%	Good pick
25	▼ 1	Carl	53.2%	4586	81	1.4%	Good pick
26	–	Mico	53.7%	2568	73	0.8%	Good pick
27	▲ 2	Sprout	54.0%	2059	69	0.6%	Good pick
28	▼ 3	Lumi	54.0%	1959	69	0.6%	Good pick
29	▼ 1	Surge	52.7%	5120	83	1.6%	Good pick
30	–	Lily	53.0%	3611	78	1.1%	Good pick
31	▲ 1	Jae-Yong	54.1%	1250	62	0.4%	Good pick
32	▲ 1	Nori	52.8%	2944	75	0.9%	Good pick
33	▲ 2	Finx	53.4%	1616	66	0.5%	Good pick
34	–	Juju	53.6%	1394	63	0.4%	Good pick
35	▼ 4	Damian	52.8%	2230	71	0.7%	Good pick
36	▲ 1	Mina	52.9%	1899	68	0.6%	Good pick
37	▲ 1	Max	52.3%	3109	75	0.9%	Good pick
38	▼ 2	Leon	51.9%	5324	84	1.6%	Good pick
39	▲ 1	Pearl	52.1%	2539	72	0.8%	Solid
40	▲ 1	Penny	51.2%	3966	79	1.2%	Solid
41	▼ 2	Gale	51.4%	3107	75	0.9%	Solid
42	▲ 5	Ash	51.5%	2215	70	0.7%	Solid
43	▼ 1	Otis	51.3%	2122	70	0.6%	Solid
44	▲ 2	Kit	50.5%	3633	78	1.1%	Solid
45	▼ 1	Melodie	51.2%	1614	66	0.5%	Solid
46	▼ 1	Dynamike	49.9%	5587	84	1.7%	Solid
47	▼ 4	Amber	50.3%	2482	72	0.8%	Solid
48	▲ 1	Wendy	60.2%	113	26	0.0%	Solid
49	▲ 4	Gigi	50.9%	1362	63	0.4%	Solid
50	▲ 6	Eve	50.7%	1514	65	0.5%	Solid
51	▲ 3	Hank	50.2%	2074	69	0.6%	Solid
52	▼ 3	Colette	49.7%	3574	78	1.1%	Solid
53	▼ 5	Stu	49.4%	4289	80	1.3%	Solid
54	▼ 1	Draco	50.6%	1261	62	0.4%	Solid
55	▼ 5	Lou	49.7%	2052	69	0.6%	Solid
56	▲ 3	Sam	49.6%	1789	67	0.5%	Solid
57	▲ 4	Ruffs	49.5%	1949	69	0.6%	Solid
58	▲ 4	Cordelius	49.0%	3048	75	0.9%	Solid
59	▼ 1	Grom	49.0%	2564	73	0.8%	Solid
60	▲ 5	Ollie	49.8%	1200	61	0.4%	Solid
61	▼ 3	Pierce	49.3%	1711	67	0.5%	Solid
62	▲ 2	Frank	48.7%	3051	75	0.9%	Solid
63	▲ 4	Rico	48.2%	6104	86	1.9%	Solid
64	▼ 8	Meg	48.5%	2910	75	0.9%	Solid
65	–	Berry	48.8%	1865	68	0.6%	Solid
66	▼ 3	8-Bit	48.2%	3802	79	1.2%	Solid
67	▲ 4	Mr. P	48.3%	2777	74	0.8%	Solid
68	▼ 8	Shade	48.2%	2899	74	0.9%	Solid
69	▼ 1	Trunk	48.5%	1822	67	0.6%	Solid
70	▲ 3	Glowy	48.4%	1379	63	0.4%	Solid
71	▲ 1	Meeple	47.5%	2464	72	0.7%	Solid
72	▲ 5	Chester	47.3%	3379	77	1.0%	Solid
73	▼ 4	Buzz	47.2%	3229	76	1.0%	Rather not
74	▲ 1	Najia	47.6%	1768	67	0.5%	Rather not
75	▼ 5	Maisie	47.3%	2315	71	0.7%	Rather not
76	▲ 4	R-T	47.9%	1100	60	0.3%	Rather not
77	▼ 1	Darryl	46.7%	3741	78	1.1%	Rather not
78	▼ 4	Lola	47.1%	2027	69	0.6%	Rather not
79	–	Kaze	47.0%	2216	70	0.7%	Rather not
80	▲ 2	Nita	46.2%	5102	83	1.5%	Rather not
81	▼ 3	Buster	47.0%	1439	64	0.4%	Rather not
82	▼ 1	Pam	46.4%	2878	74	0.9%	Rather not
83	▲ 1	Bonnie	46.0%	1978	69	0.6%	Rather not
84	▲ 1	Byron	45.5%	2611	73	0.8%	Rather not
85	▼ 2	Alli	45.7%	1448	64	0.4%	Rather not
86	–	Gray	43.8%	2008	69	0.6%	Rather not
87	▲ 4	Doug	43.0%	1583	65	0.5%	Rather not
88	▼ 1	Nani	42.6%	2498	72	0.8%	Rather not
89	▼ 1	Belle	42.7%	1844	68	0.6%	Rather not
90	▼ 1	Gene	42.5%	2446	72	0.7%	Rather not
91	▼ 1	Bea	42.3%	2694	73	0.8%	Rather not
92	–	Willow	42.4%	1898	68	0.6%	Rather not
93	–	Mandy	40.7%	2104	70	0.6%	Rather not
94	–	Poco	40.3%	4540	81	1.4%	Rather not
95	–	Piper	40.4%	2176	70	0.7%	Rather not
96	▲ 1	Brock	40.0%	5815	85	1.8%	Rather not
97	▲ 1	Chuck	40.4%	1427	64	0.4%	Rather not
98	▲ 1	Colt	39.5%	6247	86	1.9%	Rather not
99	▼ 3	Gus	39.6%	2567	73	0.8%	Rather not
100	–	Barley	38.6%	4101	80	1.2%	Rather not
101	▲ 1	Jacky	38.2%	2207	70	0.7%	Rather not
102	▼ 1	Bull	37.9%	4204	80	1.3%	Rather not
103	–	Angelo	37.3%	1237	62	0.4%	Rather not
104	–	Shelly	36.7%	4809	82	1.5%	Rather not
105	▲ 1	Rosa	35.8%	3362	77	1.0%	Rather not
106	▼ 1	El Primo	35.5%	3981	79	1.2%	Rather not