Gem Grab

Double Swoosh

299,227 battles collected on this map.

TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 35 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Controller 54949 games

Damage Dealer 12547 games

Damage Dealer 33530 games

Damage Dealer 4517 games

Controller 80478 games

Damage Dealer 25363 games

Damage Dealer 2797 games

Controller 89995 games

Damage Dealer 5206 games

Damage Dealer 56662 games

Assassin 131545 games

Controller 13381 games

Controller 7589 games

Damage Dealer 10889 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pick Good pickThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Gem Grab): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Damian 57.2%Winrate 14,064 games

Moe 56.9%Winrate 4,517 games

Trunk 55.3%Winrate 5,634 games

Draco 55.2%Winrate 4,027 games

Overrated

8-Bit 45.6%Winrate 21,826 games

Rico 42.4%Winrate 27,079 games

Brock 39.5%Winrate 24,672 games

Colt 36.9%Winrate 22,294 games

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 9,769 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 918 real line-ups.

66.2% expected

66.2% expected

66.2% expected

66.2% expected

66.2% expected

66.2% expected

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 9,769 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 918 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (1,138 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Bolt	67.3%	43324	100	3.4%	Strong pick
2	–	Ash	59.0%	12443	96	1.3%	Strong pick
3	–	Bo	58.1%	54949	100	2.1%	Strong pick
4	–	Wendy	57.2%	121302	100	3.8%	Strong pick
5	–	Starr Nova	57.4%	25688	100	1.5%	Strong pick
6	–	Clancy	57.5%	12547	96	0.7%	Good pick
7	–	Damian	57.2%	14064	98	0.5%	Good pick
8	–	Doug	56.8%	15646	100	0.7%	Good pick
9	–	Tara	56.5%	33530	100	1.5%	Good pick
10	▲ 1	Moe	56.9%	4517	81	0.3%	Good pick
11	▼ 1	Griff	55.6%	80478	100	2.8%	Good pick
12	–	Trunk	55.3%	5634	84	0.5%	Good pick
13	–	Chester	54.3%	25363	100	0.9%	Good pick
14	–	Draco	55.2%	4027	79	0.3%	Good pick
15	–	R-T	55.1%	2797	74	0.2%	Good pick
16	–	Emz	53.2%	89995	100	3.9%	Good pick
17	–	Rosa	53.6%	19610	100	1.0%	Good pick
18	–	Janet	54.4%	4697	82	0.3%	Good pick
19	–	Lumi	54.0%	5206	83	0.4%	Good pick
20	–	Bibi	52.9%	51186	100	2.0%	Good pick
21	–	Surge	52.7%	56662	100	2.2%	Good pick
22	–	Nori	52.4%	44458	100	2.5%	Solid
23	–	Mina	52.9%	6816	87	0.5%	Solid
24	–	Alli	52.7%	8416	90	0.5%	Solid
25	–	Mortis	51.9%	48173	100	2.7%	Solid
26	–	Jae-Yong	53.3%	1846	68	0.2%	Solid
27	–	Crow	50.9%	52508	100	2.2%	Solid
28	–	Bull	51.0%	39532	100	1.5%	Solid
29	–	Glowy	52.1%	2896	74	0.2%	Solid
30	–	Gigi	51.4%	3694	78	0.2%	Solid
31	–	Edgar	49.9%	131545	100	5.8%	Solid
32	–	Stu	50.4%	11594	95	0.8%	Solid
33	–	Sandy	50.1%	13381	97	0.9%	Solid
34	–	Ruffs	50.8%	3231	76	0.2%	Solid
35	▼ 1	Amber	50.1%	7589	89	0.4%	Solid
36	▲ 1	Pearl	49.9%	10889	94	1.0%	Solid
37	–	Finx	50.6%	3017	75	0.2%	Solid
38	–	Kit	49.7%	11840	95	0.6%	Solid
39	–	Meg	49.4%	23242	100	1.5%	Solid
40	–	Sirius	49.6%	11420	95	0.5%	Solid
41	–	Lily	49.0%	19111	100	1.1%	Solid
42	–	Nita	48.9%	22891	100	1.8%	Solid
43	–	Kenji	48.6%	22655	100	1.4%	Solid
44	–	Fang	48.6%	22765	100	1.2%	Solid
45	–	Pierce	49.1%	5249	83	0.4%	Solid
46	–	Otis	48.3%	11673	95	0.7%	Solid
47	–	Carl	47.9%	10751	94	0.8%	Solid
48	▲ 1	Meeple	48.3%	5178	83	0.3%	Solid
49	▼ 1	Kaze	48.1%	6975	88	0.4%	Solid
50	–	Mico	48.1%	4212	80	0.2%	Rather not
51	–	Jessie	47.1%	18196	100	1.2%	Rather not
52	–	Hank	47.9%	2916	75	0.1%	Rather not
53	–	Lola	47.5%	3291	76	0.2%	Rather not
54	–	Spike	46.4%	26232	100	1.3%	Rather not
55	–	Cordelius	46.4%	15930	100	0.9%	Rather not
56	–	Ziggy	47.8%	1523	65	0.1%	Rather not
57	–	Sam	47.2%	2871	74	0.2%	Rather not
58	–	Juju	47.2%	1457	64	0.1%	Rather not
59	–	8-Bit	45.6%	21826	100	1.9%	Rather not
60	–	Shade	46.1%	6016	85	0.4%	Rather not
61	▲ 1	Buzz	45.6%	15008	99	0.9%	Rather not
62	▼ 1	Charlie	46.0%	5665	84	0.5%	Rather not
63	–	Buster	45.8%	4489	81	0.3%	Rather not
64	–	Frank	45.2%	19612	100	1.2%	Rather not
65	–	Gray	45.9%	3608	78	0.3%	Rather not
66	–	Najia	46.0%	2965	75	0.2%	Rather not
67	–	Jacky	45.3%	9266	92	0.6%	Rather not
68	–	Sprout	45.5%	2449	72	0.2%	Rather not
69	–	Max	44.6%	11210	95	1.0%	Rather not
70	–	Leon	44.3%	22006	100	1.2%	Rather not
71	–	Shelly	44.2%	28776	100	1.6%	Rather not
72	–	Tick	44.0%	21429	100	1.6%	Rather not
73	–	Gale	43.6%	10337	93	0.7%	Rather not
74	–	Chuck	43.9%	2637	73	0.2%	Rather not
75	–	Poco	43.0%	17403	100	1.2%	Rather not
76	–	Rico	42.4%	27079	100	1.9%	Rather not
77	–	Pam	42.6%	6204	86	0.7%	Rather not
78	–	Lou	42.5%	6639	87	0.5%	Rather not
79	–	Darryl	42.0%	11863	96	0.7%	Rather not
80	–	Ollie	42.4%	2239	71	0.3%	Rather not
81	–	Mandy	41.7%	5746	85	0.3%	Rather not
82	–	Mr. P	41.6%	4726	82	0.5%	Rather not
83	–	Penny	41.0%	11066	94	0.9%	Rather not
84	–	Nani	41.1%	3974	79	0.2%	Rather not
85	–	Gus	40.9%	4182	80	0.3%	Rather not
86	–	Colette	39.8%	15766	100	0.9%	Rather not
87	–	Brock	39.5%	24672	100	1.8%	Rather not
88	–	Maisie	39.5%	5238	83	0.4%	Rather not
89	–	Larry & Lawrie	39.2%	4122	80	0.5%	Rather not
90	–	Squeak	38.9%	12784	97	1.0%	Rather not
91	–	Dynamike	38.6%	19206	100	1.3%	Rather not
92	–	Gene	38.0%	6325	86	0.5%	Rather not
93	–	Willow	38.1%	2456	72	0.1%	Rather not
94	–	Colt	36.9%	22294	100	1.7%	Rather not
95	–	Angelo	37.4%	1527	65	0.1%	Rather not
96	–	Eve	37.2%	3208	76	0.4%	Rather not
97	–	El Primo	36.7%	13156	97	1.1%	Rather not
98	–	Byron	36.2%	8906	91	0.8%	Rather not
99	–	Melodie	36.2%	3785	78	0.4%	Rather not
100	–	Berry	34.1%	5888	85	0.5%	Rather not
101	–	Bea	33.8%	6166	86	0.6%	Rather not
102	–	Belle	32.4%	4328	80	0.4%	Rather not
103	–	Piper	32.0%	7610	89	0.7%	Rather not
104	–	Bonnie	31.2%	3270	76	0.4%	Rather not
105	–	Barley	30.1%	7138	88	0.7%	Rather not
106	–	Grom	29.7%	5469	84	0.5%	Rather not