Gem Grab

Double Swoosh

255,900 battles collected on this map.

TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 30 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 10390 games

Trust

Strong pick

58.6%Win rate

Controller 49808 games

Damage Dealer 29669 games

Controller 73265 games

Controller 80475 games

Damage Dealer 22992 games

Damage Dealer 51265 games

Damage Dealer 3612 games

Assassin 120168 games

Damage Dealer 7923 games

Damage Dealer 4086 games

Damage Dealer 18509 games

Controller 10737 games

Damage Dealer 2192 games

Controller 9916 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickHow the brawler stands on this map compared to the whole mode (Gem Grab): Strong pick is the top tenth of all map/brawler rows, Good pick the top quarter, Solid the upper half, Rather not the rest. What is measured is the cautiously computed win rate (Wilson lower bound), the same number the cards are sorted by — not the percentage shown beside it. The thresholds come from the field rather than from fixed percentages: the modes sit at different levels, and in Showdown the number counts trophy gains rather than wins. Not to be confused with the tier list — that ranks a brawler by how many maps of the rotation he is usable on, across all maps together. A Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “played badly”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Moe 54.3%Winrate 3,612 games

Janet 52.3%Winrate 3,956 games

Trunk 52.0%Winrate 4,460 games

Draco 51.9%Winrate 3,212 games

Overrated

Shelly 44.3%Winrate 24,624 games

Spike 46.6%Winrate 23,059 games

Rico 42.3%Winrate 22,024 games

Brock 39.7%Winrate 20,083 games

If you queue as three

three-brawler line-ups that actually exist — counted across the whole mode.

This is for Gem Grab as a whole, not for this map. There are not enough numbers here yet for a map-specific calculation — the calibration needs line-ups actually played on this map. As soon as enough accumulate, the calculation for Double Swoosh appears in this spot; until then the mode-wide list is the best available answer.

Out of 128 line-ups with 120+ games.

Bolt

Wendy

75.9% 225 games

8-Bit

Bolt

Wendy

75.1% 141 games

Bolt

Nori

Wendy

74.8% 374 games

Bolt

Emz

Wendy

71.5% 209 games

Bolt

Mortis

Wendy

71.2% 141 games

Bolt

Surge

Wendy

70.7% 169 games

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. three-brawler line-ups that actually exist, counted across the whole mode — not for this map. There is no basis for a map-specific calculation yet: the calibration needs line-ups played on this map. The measured number is therefore not a prediction for Double Swoosh, but the answer to what generally wins in Gem Grab.

Measured · in the mode. The strongest three-brawler line-ups in this mode, out of 128 with at least 120 games. The number is deliberately cautious: unchecked, the luckiest outlier would sit on top. Per mode, not per map — on a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a number of its own.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Bolt	66.0%	32719	100	2.1%	Strong pick
2	–	Ash	58.8%	8560	91	0.6%	Strong pick
3	▼ 1	Clancy	58.6%	10390	94	0.7%	Strong pick
4	▲ 1	Bo	58.0%	49808	100	3.2%	Strong pick
5	–	Tara	57.0%	29669	100	1.9%	Strong pick
6	–	Wendy	56.3%	113350	100	7.4%	Strong pick
7	–	Griff	56.0%	73265	100	4.8%	Strong pick
8	–	Starr Nova	56.1%	21806	100	1.4%	Strong pick
9	–	Doug	55.9%	13775	98	0.9%	Strong pick
10	–	Damian	55.8%	12608	96	0.8%	Strong pick
11	–	Rosa	54.6%	16741	100	1.1%	Good pick
12	–	Emz	53.8%	80475	100	5.2%	Good pick
13	–	Bibi	53.6%	46704	100	3.0%	Good pick
14	–	Chester	53.6%	22992	100	1.5%	Good pick
15	–	Surge	53.1%	51265	100	3.3%	Good pick
16	–	Moe	54.3%	3612	78	0.2%	Good pick
17	–	Mortis	51.4%	41175	100	2.7%	Good pick
18	▲ 1	Bull	51.5%	36026	100	2.3%	Good pick
19	▼ 1	Crow	51.3%	46677	100	3.0%	Good pick
20	–	Janet	52.3%	3956	79	0.3%	Good pick
21	–	Trunk	52.0%	4460	81	0.3%	Good pick
22	▲ 2	Draco	51.9%	3212	76	0.2%	Solid
23	–	Alli	51.2%	7097	88	0.5%	Solid
24	▼ 2	Edgar	50.3%	120168	100	7.8%	Solid
25	–	Pearl	51.1%	7923	89	0.5%	Solid
26	▲ 1	Lumi	51.4%	4086	80	0.3%	Solid
27	▼ 1	Nita	50.5%	18509	100	1.2%	Solid
28	–	Sandy	50.5%	10737	94	0.7%	Solid
29	▲ 2	R-T	51.6%	2192	70	0.1%	Solid
30	–	Mina	50.7%	5364	84	0.3%	Solid
31	▼ 2	Nori	49.8%	37456	100	2.4%	Solid
32	–	Meg	49.6%	18870	100	1.2%	Solid
33	–	Lily	49.3%	16292	100	1.1%	Solid
34	–	Fang	48.9%	19518	100	1.3%	Solid
35	–	Buster	49.7%	3439	77	0.2%	Solid
36	▲ 1	Kenji	48.6%	19043	100	1.2%	Solid
37	▼ 1	Otis	48.8%	9916	93	0.6%	Solid
38	–	Gigi	49.2%	3088	75	0.2%	Solid
39	▲ 2	Kit	48.1%	10400	94	0.7%	Solid
40	▼ 1	Sirius	48.1%	10205	93	0.7%	Solid
41	▲ 1	Amber	48.2%	6461	86	0.4%	Solid
42	▼ 2	Carl	48.1%	8838	91	0.6%	Solid
43	▲ 2	Stu	47.9%	9292	92	0.6%	Solid
44	–	Cordelius	47.7%	13717	98	0.9%	Solid
45	▼ 2	Jae-Yong	49.2%	1423	64	0.1%	Solid
46	–	Jessie	47.1%	15288	99	1.0%	Solid
47	–	Spike	46.6%	23059	100	1.5%	Solid
48	▲ 1	Finx	47.7%	2412	72	0.2%	Solid
49	▼ 1	Buzz	46.6%	12864	97	0.8%	Solid
50	–	Mico	47.0%	3784	78	0.2%	Rather not
51	–	Charlie	46.7%	4448	81	0.3%	Rather not
52	▲ 1	Jacky	46.2%	7652	89	0.5%	Rather not
53	▲ 1	Ruffs	46.9%	2593	73	0.2%	Rather not
54	▼ 2	Glowy	47.0%	2152	70	0.1%	Rather not
55	–	Tick	45.5%	16913	100	1.1%	Rather not
56	–	Frank	45.3%	16733	100	1.1%	Rather not
57	–	Ollie	46.5%	1555	65	0.1%	Rather not
58	▲ 1	8-Bit	45.1%	16447	100	1.1%	Rather not
59	▼ 1	Leon	45.0%	19069	100	1.2%	Rather not
60	–	Kaze	45.3%	5766	85	0.4%	Rather not
61	–	Pierce	45.1%	4066	80	0.3%	Rather not
62	▲ 1	Shelly	44.3%	24624	100	1.6%	Rather not
63	▼ 1	Max	44.6%	8404	90	0.5%	Rather not
64	▲ 1	Meeple	44.9%	4073	80	0.3%	Rather not
65	▼ 1	Lola	45.0%	2737	74	0.2%	Rather not
66	–	Hank	45.0%	2473	72	0.2%	Rather not
67	–	Gale	44.2%	8421	90	0.5%	Rather not
68	–	Sam	44.6%	2428	72	0.2%	Rather not
69	–	Pam	43.5%	4493	81	0.3%	Rather not
70	–	Poco	43.0%	14095	98	0.9%	Rather not
71	▲ 1	Shade	43.2%	5048	83	0.3%	Rather not
72	▼ 1	Juju	43.9%	1236	62	0.1%	Rather not
73	–	Rico	42.3%	22024	100	1.4%	Rather not
74	–	Ziggy	43.5%	1199	61	0.1%	Rather not
75	▲ 1	Mr. P	42.7%	3457	77	0.2%	Rather not
76	▼ 1	Darryl	42.2%	9890	93	0.6%	Rather not
77	–	Lou	41.7%	5314	84	0.3%	Rather not
78	–	Larry & Lawrie	41.2%	2951	75	0.2%	Rather not
79	–	Eve	41.2%	2129	70	0.1%	Rather not
80	▲ 1	Najia	41.2%	2319	71	0.2%	Rather not
81	▼ 1	Maisie	40.9%	3974	79	0.3%	Rather not
82	▲ 1	Colette	40.3%	13128	97	0.9%	Rather not
83	▲ 1	Penny	40.3%	8663	91	0.6%	Rather not
84	▲ 1	Sprout	40.7%	1900	68	0.1%	Rather not
85	▼ 3	Melodie	40.5%	2670	73	0.2%	Rather not
86	–	Brock	39.7%	20083	100	1.3%	Rather not
87	–	Squeak	39.5%	10167	93	0.7%	Rather not
88	–	Dynamike	39.3%	15826	100	1.0%	Rather not
89	–	Gray	39.8%	2744	74	0.2%	Rather not
90	–	Chuck	39.2%	1981	69	0.1%	Rather not
91	–	Mandy	38.6%	4843	82	0.3%	Rather not
92	–	Nani	38.3%	3408	77	0.2%	Rather not
93	–	Gene	37.5%	4949	82	0.3%	Rather not
94	–	Colt	36.6%	18028	100	1.2%	Rather not
95	–	El Primo	36.2%	10537	94	0.7%	Rather not
96	–	Gus	35.6%	3284	76	0.2%	Rather not
97	–	Willow	35.1%	2171	70	0.1%	Rather not
98	–	Byron	34.7%	6531	87	0.4%	Rather not
99	▲ 1	Bonnie	33.2%	2323	71	0.2%	Rather not
100	▲ 1	Bea	33.1%	4510	81	0.3%	Rather not
101	▼ 2	Berry	32.9%	4595	81	0.3%	Rather not
102	–	Angelo	32.0%	1190	61	0.1%	Rather not
103	–	Belle	30.8%	3051	75	0.2%	Rather not
104	–	Grom	30.4%	4364	81	0.3%	Rather not
105	–	Piper	29.5%	5696	85	0.4%	Rather not
106	–	Barley	27.7%	5433	84	0.4%	Rather not