
Heist
59,050 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 45 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 3,100 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 838 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 3,100 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 838 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (24 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Nori |
68.6% | 29208 | 100 | 7.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | ▲ 1 | Gigi |
67.7% | 1631 | 66 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | ▲ 1 | Mico |
63.5% | 10524 | 94 | 2.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▼ 2 | Kaze |
63.0% | 8849 | 91 | 2.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Wendy |
67.4% | 871 | 56 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Lumi |
63.4% | 2001 | 69 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Starr Nova |
62.4% | 2515 | 72 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Chuck |
60.2% | 10582 | 94 | 2.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Sirius |
61.9% | 2290 | 71 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▲ 5 | Shade |
60.1% | 2326 | 71 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▼ 1 | R-T |
62.2% | 896 | 57 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 1 | Amber |
59.6% | 2671 | 73 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 1 | Bolt |
60.0% | 2123 | 70 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▲ 3 | Doug |
61.3% | 1002 | 59 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▼ 3 | Lola |
61.0% | 1109 | 60 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 6 | Trunk |
60.2% | 903 | 57 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 2 | Pierce |
58.7% | 1302 | 62 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▼ 7 | 8-Bit |
55.5% | 17002 | 100 | 4.8% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▲ 6 | Bo |
55.9% | 2552 | 73 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▼ 2 | Nita |
54.5% | 13890 | 98 | 3.9% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 5 | Ziggy |
58.7% | 608 | 51 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▲ 1 | Chester |
56.6% | 1287 | 62 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 6 | Draco |
57.5% | 848 | 56 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▼ 8 | Griff |
54.1% | 9148 | 92 | 2.5% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▼ 5 | Ruffs |
57.6% | 637 | 52 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▲ 23 | Stu |
56.5% | 788 | 55 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▼ 6 | Melodie |
52.4% | 7371 | 88 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▲ 8 | Sprout |
54.8% | 957 | 58 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▲ 18 | Hank |
56.4% | 518 | 49 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▲ 9 | Alli |
56.8% | 456 | 47 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▼ 3 | Juju |
56.3% | 467 | 47 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 32 | – | Mandy |
52.5% | 3116 | 76 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▲ 2 | Nani |
53.5% | 1232 | 62 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 34 | – | Sam |
55.4% | 523 | 49 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▼ 5 | Glowy |
54.6% | 713 | 53 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▲ 2 | Willow |
54.7% | 666 | 52 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▼ 6 | Finx |
56.1% | 380 | 44 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▲ 2 | Kit |
53.2% | 936 | 58 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▲ 2 | Gray |
54.9% | 466 | 47 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▲ 4 | Damian |
54.8% | 383 | 44 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▼ 16 | Carl |
50.7% | 4245 | 80 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 5 | Moe |
53.1% | 591 | 51 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▲ 11 | Jae-Yong |
54.9% | 308 | 41 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▼ 11 | Jessie |
48.8% | 16234 | 100 | 4.4% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▼ 18 | Bull |
49.0% | 7331 | 88 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 4 | Edgar |
48.6% | 15288 | 99 | 4.6% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 4 | Janet |
52.0% | 319 | 41 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 5 | Berry |
48.0% | 5536 | 84 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▲ 17 | Mortis |
49.3% | 1145 | 61 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▼ 2 | Penny |
47.6% | 7676 | 89 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▲ 6 | Meeple |
50.5% | 475 | 47 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▼ 8 | Colt |
46.9% | 16736 | 100 | 4.1% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▲ 2 | Najia |
49.6% | 564 | 50 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▲ 18 | Gus |
49.4% | 583 | 50 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 55 | ▼ 3 | Bibi |
46.9% | 4707 | 82 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 56 | ▼ 3 | Mina |
49.0% | 402 | 45 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▼ 11 | Cordelius |
46.8% | 2637 | 73 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▲ 5 | Angelo |
46.3% | 374 | 44 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▼ 2 | Brock |
44.0% | 10182 | 93 | 3.2% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▲ 3 | Rico |
44.1% | 8366 | 90 | 2.7% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▼ 11 | Buzz |
44.5% | 2206 | 70 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 2 | Emz |
43.8% | 6373 | 86 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 4 | Colette |
43.4% | 7695 | 89 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 1 | Darryl |
43.7% | 2584 | 73 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 4 | Meg |
43.2% | 2901 | 74 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 6 | Pearl |
43.2% | 1481 | 64 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 2 | Frank |
42.0% | 3468 | 77 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 7 | Barley |
41.4% | 4374 | 81 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 2 | Squeak |
41.1% | 2358 | 71 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 3 | Kenji |
40.8% | 2108 | 70 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 1 | Spike |
40.4% | 3484 | 77 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 4 | Dynamike |
40.1% | 5808 | 85 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 16 | Clancy |
40.5% | 1967 | 69 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 9 | Crow |
40.1% | 6052 | 85 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 1 | El Primo |
39.8% | 3640 | 78 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▲ 1 | Surge |
39.8% | 2580 | 73 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▲ 1 | Ash |
38.9% | 1375 | 63 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 3 | Pam |
38.9% | 1214 | 61 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 5 | Tara |
38.8% | 1642 | 66 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 1 | Otis |
38.4% | 2003 | 69 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 6 | Larry & Lawrie |
38.2% | 1991 | 69 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 7 | Lily |
37.5% | 1730 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 5 | Rosa |
36.1% | 1483 | 64 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 4 | Maisie |
36.0% | 1260 | 62 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 5 | Leon |
35.9% | 2068 | 69 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 15 | Fang |
35.9% | 1806 | 67 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 10 | Piper |
35.5% | 2398 | 72 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 4 | Jacky |
34.7% | 1249 | 62 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 5 | Charlie |
34.5% | 1147 | 61 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 3 | Shelly |
34.3% | 3078 | 75 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Gale |
33.5% | 1298 | 62 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▲ 8 | Max |
33.6% | 1958 | 69 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 8 | Buster |
32.3% | 659 | 52 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 2 | Grom |
33.0% | 1561 | 65 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 9 | Eve |
32.2% | 904 | 57 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▲ 3 | Byron |
32.6% | 1934 | 68 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 15 | Ollie |
28.5% | 316 | 41 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 2 | Lou |
32.0% | 1377 | 63 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▼ 1 | Poco |
31.2% | 1814 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▲ 3 | Bea |
30.1% | 1294 | 62 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 7 | Belle |
30.0% | 1220 | 61 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 1 | Mr. P |
29.8% | 1158 | 61 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▲ 3 | Tick |
30.3% | 2785 | 74 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 2 | Sandy |
28.4% | 1062 | 59 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▼ 1 | Bonnie |
27.9% | 1221 | 62 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | ▼ 1 | Gene |
24.9% | 770 | 55 | 0.2% | Rather not |