
Heist
60,774 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 44 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 3,100 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 853 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 3,100 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 853 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (23 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Nori |
68.6% | 30087 | 100 | 7.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | ▲ 2 | Gigi |
67.9% | 1659 | 66 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Mico |
63.6% | 10811 | 94 | 2.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▼ 2 | Kaze |
63.2% | 9071 | 92 | 2.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Wendy |
67.4% | 897 | 57 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Lumi |
63.9% | 2066 | 69 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Starr Nova |
62.4% | 2587 | 73 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Chuck |
60.4% | 10831 | 94 | 2.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Sirius |
61.6% | 2345 | 71 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | R-T |
62.4% | 933 | 57 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▲ 2 | Amber |
59.9% | 2735 | 74 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 3 | Shade |
60.0% | 2409 | 72 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 4 | Doug |
61.6% | 1025 | 59 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▼ 3 | Lola |
61.0% | 1131 | 60 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▼ 1 | Bolt |
59.5% | 2180 | 70 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 3 | Pierce |
59.4% | 1355 | 63 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 5 | Trunk |
60.3% | 930 | 57 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▼ 6 | 8-Bit |
55.5% | 17504 | 100 | 4.8% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▲ 6 | Bo |
56.1% | 2647 | 73 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▲ 7 | Draco |
57.9% | 872 | 56 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▼ 2 | Nita |
54.5% | 14270 | 98 | 3.9% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▲ 1 | Chester |
56.9% | 1317 | 63 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 3 | Ziggy |
58.5% | 624 | 51 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▼ 8 | Griff |
54.0% | 9414 | 92 | 2.5% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▼ 5 | Ruffs |
57.7% | 652 | 52 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▲ 23 | Stu |
56.5% | 817 | 55 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▲ 19 | Hank |
56.9% | 540 | 49 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▼ 7 | Melodie |
52.3% | 7572 | 89 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▲ 3 | Mandy |
53.0% | 3199 | 76 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▲ 7 | Sprout |
54.6% | 990 | 58 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▼ 1 | Glowy |
55.0% | 740 | 54 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▲ 6 | Alli |
56.3% | 471 | 47 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▼ 4 | Juju |
56.2% | 477 | 47 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▲ 1 | Nani |
53.7% | 1269 | 62 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▼ 1 | Sam |
55.6% | 549 | 50 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▲ 3 | Kit |
53.8% | 964 | 58 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▼ 6 | Finx |
56.3% | 387 | 44 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▲ 2 | Willow |
54.2% | 679 | 53 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▲ 2 | Gray |
55.1% | 474 | 47 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▲ 5 | Damian |
55.0% | 400 | 45 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▼ 5 | Moe |
53.3% | 604 | 51 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 18 | Carl |
50.4% | 4367 | 81 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▲ 9 | Jae-Yong |
55.2% | 317 | 41 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▼ 11 | Jessie |
48.9% | 16717 | 100 | 4.4% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▼ 18 | Bull |
48.8% | 7540 | 89 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 4 | Edgar |
48.5% | 15742 | 100 | 4.6% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 19 | Mortis |
49.7% | 1190 | 61 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 5 | Berry |
48.0% | 5694 | 85 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 1 | Penny |
47.7% | 7902 | 89 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▲ 1 | Janet |
51.7% | 325 | 42 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▲ 21 | Gus |
49.7% | 599 | 51 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▲ 2 | Najia |
49.7% | 577 | 50 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▲ 3 | Meeple |
49.9% | 489 | 48 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▼ 9 | Colt |
46.8% | 17110 | 100 | 4.1% | Solid | ||
| 55 | ▼ 1 | Mina |
49.7% | 431 | 46 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 56 | ▼ 2 | Bibi |
47.0% | 4830 | 82 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 57 | ▼ 10 | Cordelius |
46.7% | 2722 | 74 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▲ 6 | Angelo |
46.5% | 383 | 44 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▼ 2 | Brock |
44.1% | 10501 | 94 | 3.2% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 10 | Buzz |
44.8% | 2279 | 71 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 1 | Rico |
44.0% | 8594 | 91 | 2.7% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 2 | Emz |
43.6% | 6546 | 87 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 4 | Colette |
43.3% | 7895 | 89 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 1 | Darryl |
43.5% | 2657 | 73 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 5 | Meg |
43.2% | 3000 | 75 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 5 | Pearl |
43.3% | 1522 | 65 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 2 | Frank |
42.1% | 3602 | 78 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 7 | Barley |
41.5% | 4501 | 81 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 2 | Squeak |
41.1% | 2432 | 72 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 2 | Dynamike |
40.2% | 6014 | 85 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – | Kenji |
40.6% | 2182 | 70 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 2 | Spike |
40.3% | 3599 | 78 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 9 | Crow |
40.0% | 6227 | 86 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 3 | El Primo |
40.1% | 3755 | 78 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 17 | Clancy |
40.3% | 2025 | 69 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Surge |
39.9% | 2669 | 73 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▲ 4 | Pam |
39.2% | 1252 | 62 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Ash |
38.8% | 1414 | 64 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – | Otis |
38.6% | 2076 | 69 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 6 | Tara |
38.6% | 1699 | 66 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 7 | Larry & Lawrie |
38.1% | 2036 | 69 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 7 | Lily |
37.4% | 1782 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 4 | Rosa |
35.9% | 1540 | 65 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▲ 6 | Leon |
35.7% | 2132 | 70 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 5 | Maisie |
35.7% | 1304 | 62 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 13 | Fang |
35.7% | 1870 | 68 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 5 | Jacky |
35.5% | 1294 | 62 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 9 | Piper |
35.4% | 2468 | 72 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 6 | Charlie |
34.2% | 1184 | 61 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 4 | Shelly |
34.4% | 3197 | 76 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 9 | Max |
33.7% | 2011 | 69 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 1 | Gale |
33.4% | 1329 | 63 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 2 | Grom |
33.1% | 1614 | 66 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 8 | Buster |
31.7% | 672 | 53 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 4 | Byron |
32.3% | 1987 | 69 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 11 | Eve |
31.6% | 935 | 58 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 3 | Lou |
31.9% | 1428 | 64 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 15 | Ollie |
27.6% | 326 | 42 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▼ 1 | Poco |
31.1% | 1862 | 68 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▲ 3 | Bea |
30.1% | 1332 | 63 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 1 | Mr. P |
30.0% | 1188 | 61 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▲ 4 | Tick |
30.4% | 2872 | 74 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 7 | Belle |
29.9% | 1269 | 62 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 3 | Sandy |
28.5% | 1095 | 60 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▼ 1 | Bonnie |
28.2% | 1259 | 62 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | ▼ 1 | Gene |
24.9% | 798 | 55 | 0.3% | Rather not |