
Heist
61,286 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 46 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 3,085 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 859 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 3,085 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 859 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (23 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Nori |
68.6% | 30328 | 100 | 7.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | ▲ 2 | Gigi |
67.7% | 1667 | 66 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Mico |
63.6% | 10883 | 94 | 2.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▼ 2 | Kaze |
63.2% | 9126 | 92 | 2.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Wendy |
67.3% | 908 | 57 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Lumi |
63.9% | 2079 | 69 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Starr Nova |
62.2% | 2613 | 73 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Chuck |
60.4% | 10894 | 94 | 2.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Sirius |
61.6% | 2360 | 71 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | R-T |
62.3% | 942 | 58 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▲ 2 | Amber |
59.8% | 2749 | 74 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 3 | Shade |
59.9% | 2430 | 72 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 4 | Doug |
61.7% | 1031 | 59 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | – | Bolt |
59.5% | 2194 | 70 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▼ 4 | Lola |
60.8% | 1144 | 61 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 3 | Pierce |
59.5% | 1374 | 63 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 5 | Trunk |
60.4% | 944 | 58 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▼ 6 | 8-Bit |
55.4% | 17632 | 100 | 4.8% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▲ 6 | Bo |
55.9% | 2683 | 73 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▲ 3 | Chester |
57.0% | 1329 | 63 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▼ 3 | Nita |
54.4% | 14396 | 98 | 3.9% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▲ 6 | Draco |
57.8% | 888 | 57 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 3 | Ziggy |
58.7% | 630 | 52 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▼ 8 | Griff |
54.0% | 9470 | 92 | 2.5% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▼ 5 | Ruffs |
57.8% | 666 | 52 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▲ 23 | Stu |
56.8% | 825 | 56 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▲ 19 | Hank |
57.1% | 550 | 50 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▲ 9 | Sprout |
54.8% | 1004 | 59 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▲ 3 | Mandy |
53.0% | 3222 | 76 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▼ 9 | Melodie |
52.3% | 7629 | 89 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▼ 1 | Glowy |
55.1% | 750 | 54 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▲ 6 | Alli |
56.3% | 474 | 47 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 33 | – | Sam |
55.7% | 553 | 50 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▲ 1 | Nani |
53.7% | 1285 | 62 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▼ 6 | Juju |
56.1% | 478 | 47 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▼ 5 | Finx |
56.4% | 388 | 44 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▲ 4 | Kit |
53.7% | 974 | 58 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▲ 1 | Gray |
55.3% | 479 | 48 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▲ 1 | Willow |
54.2% | 685 | 53 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▲ 13 | Jae-Yong |
56.1% | 330 | 42 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 4 | Damian |
55.1% | 403 | 45 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 6 | Moe |
53.5% | 607 | 51 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 19 | Carl |
50.4% | 4392 | 81 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▼ 10 | Jessie |
48.9% | 16833 | 100 | 4.4% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▼ 3 | Edgar |
48.5% | 15852 | 100 | 4.6% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 19 | Bull |
48.7% | 7608 | 89 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 19 | Mortis |
49.8% | 1202 | 61 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 5 | Berry |
48.1% | 5762 | 85 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 1 | Penny |
47.8% | 7963 | 90 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▲ 1 | Janet |
51.7% | 327 | 42 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▲ 21 | Gus |
50.1% | 611 | 51 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▲ 5 | Meeple |
50.1% | 491 | 48 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▼ 1 | Najia |
49.7% | 585 | 51 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▼ 10 | Colt |
46.8% | 17238 | 100 | 4.1% | Solid | ||
| 55 | ▼ 1 | Bibi |
47.0% | 4874 | 82 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 56 | ▼ 1 | Mina |
49.5% | 434 | 46 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 57 | ▼ 10 | Cordelius |
46.5% | 2741 | 74 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 8 | Buzz |
44.9% | 2305 | 71 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▼ 3 | Brock |
44.1% | 10596 | 94 | 3.2% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▲ 5 | Angelo |
46.4% | 384 | 44 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 1 | Rico |
44.0% | 8660 | 91 | 2.7% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 2 | Emz |
43.8% | 6643 | 87 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 4 | Colette |
43.3% | 7959 | 90 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 4 | Meg |
43.4% | 3048 | 75 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 2 | Darryl |
43.4% | 2673 | 73 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 5 | Pearl |
43.3% | 1539 | 65 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 2 | Frank |
42.1% | 3642 | 78 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 7 | Barley |
41.6% | 4544 | 81 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 2 | Squeak |
41.0% | 2455 | 72 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | – | Kenji |
40.7% | 2208 | 70 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 13 | Clancy |
40.6% | 2041 | 69 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 4 | Dynamike |
40.2% | 6057 | 85 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 2 | Spike |
40.3% | 3631 | 78 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 8 | Crow |
40.1% | 6264 | 86 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 2 | El Primo |
40.1% | 3791 | 78 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Surge |
39.8% | 2697 | 73 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▲ 4 | Pam |
39.3% | 1261 | 62 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 1 | Otis |
38.7% | 2103 | 70 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 1 | Ash |
38.6% | 1426 | 64 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 6 | Tara |
38.5% | 1714 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 7 | Larry & Lawrie |
38.1% | 2050 | 69 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 7 | Lily |
37.6% | 1798 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 4 | Rosa |
36.0% | 1553 | 65 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▲ 6 | Leon |
35.9% | 2155 | 70 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 12 | Fang |
35.7% | 1897 | 68 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 6 | Maisie |
35.6% | 1314 | 63 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 5 | Jacky |
35.6% | 1303 | 62 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 8 | Piper |
35.5% | 2484 | 72 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 5 | Charlie |
34.3% | 1190 | 61 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 3 | Shelly |
34.3% | 3226 | 76 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Gale |
33.5% | 1336 | 63 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▲ 8 | Max |
33.6% | 2040 | 69 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 7 | Buster |
31.9% | 680 | 53 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 3 | Grom |
32.8% | 1635 | 66 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 4 | Byron |
32.4% | 2003 | 69 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 12 | Eve |
31.4% | 942 | 58 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 1 | Lou |
31.8% | 1445 | 64 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 15 | Ollie |
27.5% | 335 | 42 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▼ 1 | Poco |
31.1% | 1882 | 68 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▲ 6 | Tick |
30.5% | 2896 | 74 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 3 | Bea |
30.0% | 1339 | 63 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Mr. P |
29.8% | 1196 | 61 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 9 | Belle |
29.9% | 1287 | 62 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 3 | Sandy |
28.6% | 1104 | 60 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▼ 2 | Bonnie |
28.2% | 1270 | 62 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | ▼ 1 | Gene |
24.9% | 806 | 55 | 0.3% | Rather not |