Heist

Eating Good!

31,002 battles collected on this map.

TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 41 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 1121 games

Damage Dealer 5945 games

Damage Dealer 484 games

Damage Dealer 8957 games

Controller 4895 games

Controller 1480 games

Damage Dealer 577 games

Damage Dealer 7311 games

Damage Dealer 657 games

Damage Dealer 2302 games

Trust

Good pick

51.6%Win rate

Controller 1310 games

Controller 8815 games

Damage Dealer 384 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickHow the brawler stands on this map compared to the whole mode (Heist): Strong pick is the top tenth of all map/brawler rows, Good pick the top quarter, Solid the upper half, Rather not the rest. What is measured is the cautiously computed win rate (Wilson lower bound), the same number the cards are sorted by — not the percentage shown beside it. The thresholds come from the field rather than from fixed percentages: the modes sit at different levels, and in Showdown the number counts trophy gains rather than wins. Not to be confused with the tier list — that ranks a brawler by how many maps of the rotation he is usable on, across all maps together. A Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “played badly”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Wendy 69.5%Winrate 535 games

R-T 64.0%Winrate 484 games

Lola 59.3%Winrate 577 games

Pierce 58.4%Winrate 651 games

Overrated

Colt 47.3%Winrate 9,823 games

Edgar 47.9%Winrate 7,534 games

Brock 43.7%Winrate 4,884 games

Colette 43.4%Winrate 4,334 games

If you queue as three

three-brawler line-ups that actually exist — counted across the whole mode.

This is for Heist as a whole, not for this map. There are not enough numbers here yet for a map-specific calculation — the calibration needs line-ups actually played on this map. As soon as enough accumulate, the calculation for Eating Good! appears in this spot; until then the mode-wide list is the best available answer.

Out of 93 line-ups with 120+ games.

Bull

Emz

Nori

78.0% 261 games

Bull

Nita

Nori

78.0% 124 games

Emz

Jessie

Nori

76.7% 160 games

Griff

Mico

Nori

76.6% 125 games

Emz

Mico

Nori

76.1% 189 games

Edgar

Emz

Melodie

75.2% 146 games

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. three-brawler line-ups that actually exist, counted across the whole mode — not for this map. There is no basis for a map-specific calculation yet: the calibration needs line-ups played on this map. The measured number is therefore not a prediction for Eating Good!, but the answer to what generally wins in Heist.

Measured · in the mode. The strongest three-brawler line-ups in this mode, out of 93 with at least 120 games. The number is deliberately cautious: unchecked, the luckiest outlier would sit on top. Per mode, not per map — on a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a number of its own.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Nori	68.4%	16054	100	8.6%	Strong pick
2	–	Kaze	63.4%	5192	83	2.8%	Strong pick
3	▲ 5	Wendy	69.5%	535	49	0.3%	Strong pick
4	▼ 1	Mico	62.6%	5986	85	3.2%	Strong pick
5	–	Gigi	66.0%	1008	59	0.5%	Strong pick
6	▼ 2	Lumi	63.0%	1121	60	0.6%	Strong pick
7	–	Starr Nova	61.9%	1390	63	0.7%	Strong pick
8	▼ 2	Chuck	58.9%	5945	85	3.2%	Strong pick
9	▲ 3	Sirius	60.7%	1266	62	0.7%	Strong pick
10	▲ 9	R-T	64.0%	484	48	0.3%	Strong pick
11	▼ 2	8-Bit	56.3%	8957	91	4.8%	Strong pick
12	▼ 2	Bolt	58.3%	1226	62	0.7%	Good pick
13	▼ 2	Griff	55.9%	4895	82	2.6%	Good pick
14	▲ 1	Amber	57.0%	1480	64	0.8%	Good pick
15	▲ 3	Lola	59.3%	577	50	0.3%	Good pick
16	–	Pierce	58.4%	651	52	0.3%	Good pick
17	▲ 7	Shade	56.8%	1011	59	0.5%	Good pick
18	▼ 3	Nita	54.2%	7311	88	3.9%	Good pick
19	▼ 6	Doug	58.8%	507	48	0.3%	Good pick
20	▲ 3	Ruffs	58.4%	397	45	0.2%	Good pick
21	▼ 4	Melodie	52.9%	3962	79	2.1%	Good pick
22	▼ 3	Glowy	55.5%	416	45	0.2%	Good pick
23	▲ 6	Bull	51.5%	3641	78	2.0%	Good pick
24	▲ 9	Chester	54.0%	657	52	0.4%	Good pick
25	▲ 5	Trunk	54.7%	470	47	0.3%	Good pick
26	▼ 4	Carl	51.6%	2302	71	1.2%	Good pick
27	▲ 15	Bo	51.5%	1310	63	0.7%	Solid
28	▼ 7	Mandy	50.9%	1800	67	1.0%	Solid
29	–	Sam	55.3%	275	39	0.1%	Solid
30	▲ 19	Ziggy	54.5%	334	42	0.2%	Solid
31	▼ 3	Jessie	49.6%	8815	91	4.7%	Solid
32	▼ 3	Moe	53.9%	384	44	0.2%	Solid
33	▲ 6	Draco	53.2%	459	47	0.2%	Solid
34	–	Nani	52.2%	673	53	0.4%	Solid
35	▲ 2	Juju	54.2%	253	38	0.1%	Solid
36	▲ 10	Willow	52.4%	391	44	0.2%	Solid
37	▲ 1	Finx	54.3%	219	36	0.1%	Solid
38	▼ 14	Berry	48.9%	3021	75	1.6%	Solid
39	▼ 4	Sprout	51.2%	545	49	0.3%	Solid
40	▲ 4	Alli	52.8%	269	39	0.1%	Solid
41	▲ 1	Gray	53.4%	221	36	0.1%	Solid
42	▼ 14	Edgar	47.9%	7534	89	4.1%	Solid
43	▼ 2	Kit	50.7%	511	48	0.3%	Solid
44	▼ 4	Hank	52.6%	234	37	0.1%	Solid
45	▼ 13	Colt	47.3%	9823	93	5.3%	Solid
46	▲ 23	Cordelius	48.5%	1184	61	0.6%	Solid
47	▼ 11	Penny	46.5%	4115	80	2.2%	Solid
48	▲ 23	Buzz	47.6%	1066	59	0.6%	Solid
49	▲ 19	Stu	47.9%	363	43	0.2%	Solid
50	▲ 8	Damian	48.8%	203	35	0.1%	Solid
51	▼ 4	Jae-Yong	49.1%	159	31	0.1%	Solid
52	▼ 6	Bibi	45.7%	2569	73	1.4%	Solid
53	▲ 11	Janet	48.6%	179	33	0.1%	Solid
54	▲ 2	Mina	47.8%	228	36	0.1%	Solid
55	▼ 4	Najia	47.1%	333	42	0.2%	Rather not
56	▲ 10	Clancy	45.1%	1079	60	0.6%	Rather not
57	–	Brock	43.7%	4884	82	2.6%	Rather not
58	▼ 11	Colette	43.4%	4334	80	2.3%	Rather not
59	▲ 2	Meeple	44.8%	252	38	0.1%	Rather not
60	▼ 9	Meg	43.9%	1318	63	0.7%	Rather not
61	▲ 4	Pearl	43.6%	777	55	0.4%	Rather not
62	▼ 8	Emz	42.1%	3133	76	1.7%	Rather not
63	▼ 11	Angelo	42.4%	198	34	0.1%	Rather not
64	▲ 9	Rico	41.5%	3834	79	2.1%	Rather not
65	▼ 12	Darryl	41.9%	1254	62	0.7%	Rather not
66	▼ 7	Squeak	41.9%	1099	60	0.6%	Rather not
67	▲ 8	Ollie	38.6%	114	26	0.1%	Rather not
68	▲ 6	Dynamike	40.1%	2999	75	1.6%	Rather not
69	▲ 1	Frank	40.3%	1557	65	0.8%	Rather not
70	▲ 13	Fang	40.2%	856	56	0.5%	Rather not
71	▼ 16	Mortis	39.7%	491	48	0.3%	Rather not
72	▲ 9	Kenji	39.8%	1041	59	0.6%	Rather not
73	▼ 13	Surge	39.6%	1345	63	0.7%	Rather not
74	▼ 13	Tara	39.5%	721	54	0.4%	Rather not
75	▲ 11	Maisie	39.3%	608	51	0.3%	Rather not
76	▲ 1	Gus	38.4%	271	39	0.1%	Rather not
77	▲ 8	El Primo	39.2%	1634	66	0.9%	Rather not
78	▼ 15	Spike	39.2%	1653	66	0.9%	Rather not
79	▲ 14	Otis	39.0%	1008	59	0.5%	Rather not
80	▼ 4	Buster	37.7%	302	41	0.2%	Rather not
81	▼ 1	Ash	38.3%	666	52	0.4%	Rather not
82	▼ 3	Barley	38.3%	2477	72	1.3%	Rather not
83	▼ 16	Eve	37.5%	389	44	0.2%	Rather not
84	▲ 6	Crow	38.0%	3342	77	1.8%	Rather not
85	▲ 6	Charlie	37.7%	576	50	0.3%	Rather not
86	▼ 4	Pam	37.4%	577	50	0.3%	Rather not
87	▼ 15	Larry & Lawrie	37.1%	1043	59	0.6%	Rather not
88	▼ 1	Lily	36.0%	867	56	0.5%	Rather not
89	▲ 3	Rosa	35.8%	712	53	0.4%	Rather not
90	▼ 12	Gale	35.5%	595	51	0.3%	Rather not
91	▼ 3	Leon	35.2%	916	57	0.5%	Rather not
92	▲ 7	Grom	33.6%	753	54	0.4%	Rather not
93	▼ 9	Lou	33.2%	693	53	0.4%	Rather not
94	▲ 1	Belle	32.4%	521	49	0.3%	Rather not
95	–	Jacky	32.8%	619	51	0.3%	Rather not
96	▲ 5	Piper	32.5%	1216	61	0.7%	Rather not
97	–	Poco	31.7%	917	57	0.5%	Rather not
98	▲ 5	Shelly	32.0%	1334	63	0.7%	Rather not
99	▼ 1	Mr. P	30.0%	631	52	0.3%	Rather not
100	▼ 5	Bonnie	28.4%	609	51	0.3%	Rather not
101	▲ 1	Byron	29.2%	993	58	0.5%	Rather not
102	▼ 2	Sandy	27.3%	512	49	0.3%	Rather not
103	▼ 14	Gene	25.2%	345	43	0.2%	Rather not
104	▲ 1	Max	28.2%	968	58	0.5%	Rather not
105	▼ 1	Bea	26.5%	616	51	0.3%	Rather not
106	–	Tick	26.0%	1452	64	0.8%	Rather not