Knockout

Flaring Phoenix

2,245 battles collected on this map.

OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 16 of 30 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pick Good pick SolidHow the brawler stands on this map compared to the whole mode (Knockout): Strong pick is the top tenth of all map/brawler rows, Good pick the top quarter, Solid the upper half, Rather not the rest. What is measured is the cautiously computed win rate (Wilson lower bound), the same number the cards are sorted by — not the percentage shown beside it. The thresholds come from the field rather than from fixed percentages: the modes sit at different levels, and in Showdown the number counts trophy gains rather than wins. Not to be confused with the tier list — that ranks a brawler by how many maps of the rotation he is usable on, across all maps together. A Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “played badly”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Nothing noticeably underrated.

Overrated

Emz 45.3%Winrate 806 games

Piper 47.1%Winrate 747 games

Nori 47.6%Winrate 676 games

Dynamike 46.8%Winrate 539 games

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 5,752 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 323 real line-ups.

71.0% expected

71.0% expected

71.0% expected

71.0% expected

70.9% expected

70.9% expected

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 5,752 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 323 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (140 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Kit	80.0%	629	52	2.9%	Strong pick
2	–	Mortis	77.8%	180	33	0.8%	Strong pick
3	–	Crow	65.9%	293	40	1.4%	Good pick
4	–	Frank	59.8%	910	57	4.2%	Good pick
5	–	Brock	58.5%	1508	65	7.0%	Good pick
6	–	Bolt	66.3%	181	33	0.8%	Solid
7	–	Tick	54.6%	2416	72	11.2%	Solid
8	–	Sirius	54.4%	1425	64	6.6%	Solid
9	–	Bibi	55.2%	451	47	2.1%	Solid
10	–	Edgar	50.6%	3595	78	16.7%	Rather not
11	–	Bull	75.0%	48	13	0.2%	Rather not
12	–	Squeak	54.9%	293	40	1.4%	Rather not
13	–	Pierce	56.6%	166	32	0.8%	Rather not
14	–	Mandy	50.3%	1144	61	5.3%	Rather not
15	–	Fang	65.4%	52	14	0.2%	Rather not
16	–	Hank	59.1%	88	22	0.4%	Rather not
17	–	Mico	67.6%	37	9	0.2%	Rather not
18	▲ 2	Rosa	59.1%	66	18	0.3%	Rather not
19	▼ 1	Lola	65.0%	40	10	0.2%	Rather not
20	▼ 1	Nani	51.0%	257	38	1.2%	Rather not
21	–	Leon	56.2%	73	19	0.3%	Rather not
22	–	Belle	77.8%	18	0	0.1%	Rather not
23	–	Kenji	51.4%	177	33	0.8%	Rather not
24	–	Nita	51.8%	114	26	0.5%	Rather not
25	–	Chuck	60.0%	35	8	0.2%	Rather not
26	–	Lily	49.8%	207	35	1.0%	Rather not
27	–	Damian	61.3%	31	7	0.1%	Rather not
28	–	Ziggy	55.2%	58	16	0.3%	Rather not
29	–	Melodie	55.6%	54	15	0.3%	Rather not
30	–	Nori	47.6%	676	53	3.1%	Rather not
31	▲ 1	Barley	54.9%	51	14	0.2%	Rather not
32	▲ 1	Janet	55.6%	45	12	0.2%	Rather not
33	–	Piper	47.1%	747	54	3.5%	Rather not
34	▲ 1	Glowy	51.0%	96	23	0.4%	Rather not
35	▲ 1	Grom	51.2%	80	21	0.4%	Rather not
36	▼ 5	Buster	69.2%	13	0	0.1%	Rather not
37	▲ 3	Byron	51.5%	68	18	0.3%	Rather not
38	▼ 1	Gene	58.3%	24	3	0.1%	Rather not
39	▼ 1	Dynamike	46.8%	539	49	2.5%	Rather not
40	–	Gus	64.3%	14	0	0.1%	Rather not
41	–	Bonnie	54.8%	31	7	0.1%	Rather not
42	–	Starr Nova	55.6%	27	4	0.1%	Rather not
43	–	Larry & Lawrie	57.9%	19	0	0.1%	Rather not
44	–	Ash	51.0%	51	14	0.2%	Rather not
45	–	Trunk	51.1%	45	12	0.2%	Rather not
46	–	Charlie	63.6%	11	0	0.1%	Rather not
47	–	Emz	45.3%	806	55	3.7%	Rather not
48	▲ 1	Mr. P	53.3%	15	0	0.1%	Rather not
49	▲ 1	Otis	50.0%	18	0	0.1%	Rather not
50	▲ 1	Penny	48.4%	31	7	0.1%	Rather not
51	▲ 1	Sprout	47.6%	42	11	0.2%	Rather not
52	▲ 1	Colt	45.7%	234	37	1.1%	Rather not
53	▼ 5	Griff	46.3%	82	21	0.4%	Rather not
54	–	Willow	46.3%	54	15	0.3%	Rather not
55	–	Moe	45.8%	24	3	0.1%	Rather not
56	–	Stu	45.8%	24	3	0.1%	Rather not
57	–	Sam	45.7%	35	8	0.2%	Rather not
58	–	Mina	45.0%	20	0	0.1%	Rather not
59	–	Surge	45.3%	106	25	0.5%	Rather not
60	▲ 2	Pearl	44.4%	18	0	0.1%	Rather not
61	▼ 1	Gray	43.8%	16	0	0.1%	Rather not
62	▼ 1	Carl	42.9%	14	0	0.1%	Rather not
63	–	Darryl	42.9%	21	1	0.1%	Rather not
64	–	Maisie	44.6%	83	21	0.4%	Rather not
65	–	Jacky	42.9%	42	11	0.2%	Rather not
66	–	Poco	42.6%	54	15	0.3%	Rather not
67	–	Jessie	43.8%	192	34	0.9%	Rather not
68	–	Eve	39.3%	28	5	0.1%	Rather not
69	–	Cordelius	30.8%	13	0	0.1%	Rather not
70	–	8-Bit	40.0%	40	10	0.2%	Rather not
71	–	Doug	35.0%	20	0	0.1%	Rather not
72	–	Meeple	31.6%	19	0	0.1%	Rather not
73	▲ 1	Buzz	38.9%	54	15	0.3%	Rather not
74	▲ 1	Gale	40.0%	75	20	0.3%	Rather not
75	▲ 1	El Primo	41.0%	122	27	0.6%	Rather not
76	▼ 3	Max	28.6%	21	1	0.1%	Rather not
77	–	Pam	36.7%	49	13	0.2%	Rather not
78	–	Sandy	38.6%	70	19	0.3%	Rather not
79	–	Chester	36.5%	52	14	0.2%	Rather not
80	–	Gigi	31.3%	32	7	0.1%	Rather not
81	▲ 3	Jae-Yong	26.9%	26	4	0.1%	Rather not
82	▼ 1	Bo	31.7%	41	11	0.2%	Rather not
83	▼ 1	Bea	39.1%	151	30	0.7%	Rather not
84	▼ 1	Clancy	31.9%	47	13	0.2%	Rather not
85	–	Lou	32.7%	55	15	0.3%	Rather not
86	–	Finx	34.3%	67	18	0.3%	Rather not
87	–	Colette	30.4%	56	15	0.3%	Rather not
88	–	Shade	34.1%	91	23	0.4%	Rather not
89	–	Draco	22.5%	40	10	0.2%	Rather not
90	–	Alli	25.5%	51	14	0.2%	Rather not
91	–	Angelo	14.6%	41	11	0.2%	Rather not
92	–	Lumi	8.8%	34	8	0.2%	Rather not
93	–	Shelly	32.5%	255	38	1.2%	Rather not
94	–	Amber	30.9%	204	35	0.9%	Rather not
95	–	Spike	32.3%	372	44	1.7%	Rather not
96	–	Kaze	6.6%	61	17	0.3%	Rather not
97	–	Rico	20.5%	268	39	1.2%	Rather not