
Knockout
39,474 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 45 of 105 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 6,716 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 316 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 6,716 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 316 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (825 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Spike |
62.8% | 2875 | 74 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Eve |
61.8% | 1992 | 69 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Piper |
59.7% | 7234 | 88 | 3.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Juju |
60.2% | 1518 | 65 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 5 | – | Nani |
58.5% | 4031 | 79 | 1.7% | Good pick | ||
| 6 | – | Squeak |
59.1% | 1916 | 68 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 1 | Brock |
56.1% | 7170 | 88 | 3.0% | Good pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 1 | Belle |
56.9% | 2936 | 75 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 9 | ▲ 1 | Edgar |
56.0% | 7182 | 88 | 3.0% | Good pick | ||
| 10 | ▲ 2 | Mandy |
55.9% | 6194 | 86 | 2.6% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | ▼ 2 | Byron |
56.1% | 4645 | 81 | 2.0% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | ▼ 1 | Pierce |
56.2% | 3063 | 75 | 1.3% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 2 | Bonnie |
56.3% | 2088 | 70 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 14 | ▼ 1 | Jae-Yong |
57.4% | 1125 | 60 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 15 | ▲ 1 | Angelo |
55.3% | 4116 | 80 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 16 | ▼ 2 | Janet |
56.3% | 1372 | 63 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 17 | ▲ 1 | Najia |
55.0% | 2571 | 73 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 18 | ▲ 1 | Sirius |
54.9% | 2285 | 71 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 19 | ▼ 2 | Tick |
54.9% | 2004 | 69 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 20 | ▲ 2 | Sprout |
55.4% | 1331 | 63 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 21 | ▼ 1 | Bea |
53.7% | 3686 | 78 | 1.6% | Solid | ||
| 22 | ▲ 1 | Mr. P |
54.3% | 1626 | 66 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 23 | ▲ 2 | Mico |
53.2% | 2678 | 73 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 24 | – | 8-Bit |
53.0% | 3193 | 76 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 25 | ▼ 4 | Alli |
53.2% | 2293 | 71 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 26 | – | Grom |
53.3% | 1794 | 67 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 27 | – | Leon |
51.5% | 4657 | 82 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▲ 7 | Charlie |
52.4% | 1302 | 62 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 29 | – | Pearl |
52.2% | 1440 | 64 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 30 | – | Colette |
51.1% | 3574 | 78 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 31 | ▲ 1 | Otis |
51.6% | 1851 | 68 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 32 | – | R-T |
51.8% | 1568 | 65 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 33 | ▼ 1 | Crow |
50.8% | 4162 | 80 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 34 | ▲ 4 | Moe |
52.6% | 890 | 57 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 35 | ▲ 2 | Gus |
50.3% | 3898 | 79 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 36 | – | Rico |
50.2% | 4757 | 82 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 37 | ▼ 3 | Fang |
50.5% | 2565 | 73 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 38 | ▼ 10 | Emz |
50.7% | 1753 | 67 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 39 | ▲ 2 | Bo |
50.4% | 1835 | 68 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 40 | ▼ 1 | Carl |
50.1% | 2278 | 71 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 41 | ▼ 1 | Kit |
49.6% | 3972 | 79 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 42 | ▲ 9 | Ruffs |
50.6% | 1314 | 63 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 43 | ▲ 4 | Gray |
49.7% | 2335 | 71 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 44 | ▲ 5 | Lola |
50.1% | 1564 | 65 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 45 | ▲ 3 | Finx |
50.4% | 1254 | 62 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 46 | ▼ 3 | Buster |
50.7% | 882 | 57 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 47 | ▼ 1 | Colt |
48.6% | 7103 | 88 | 3.0% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | ▼ 5 | Larry & Lawrie |
50.1% | 1255 | 62 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | ▼ 7 | Griff |
49.4% | 2116 | 70 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▲ 3 | Jessie |
49.2% | 2149 | 70 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▼ 1 | Maisie |
49.1% | 2009 | 69 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▲ 5 | Lumi |
49.7% | 994 | 58 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▲ 2 | Meeple |
49.0% | 1709 | 67 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 8 | Glowy |
49.1% | 1157 | 61 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 2 | Amber |
48.9% | 1333 | 63 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▼ 3 | Lily |
48.2% | 2673 | 73 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▼ 1 | Ziggy |
49.4% | 759 | 54 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | – | Bibi |
47.5% | 1950 | 69 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 3 | Darryl |
47.1% | 2458 | 72 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 1 | Tara |
47.5% | 1560 | 65 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 4 | Nori |
47.2% | 1867 | 68 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 1 | Kenji |
46.9% | 1631 | 66 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▲ 3 | Gigi |
47.5% | 793 | 55 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▲ 5 | Berry |
47.2% | 1051 | 59 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▲ 3 | Pam |
46.8% | 1452 | 64 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 2 | Gale |
46.7% | 1404 | 64 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 3 | Penny |
46.5% | 1784 | 67 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 8 | Buzz |
46.4% | 2010 | 69 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 10 | Lou |
46.8% | 1124 | 60 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 2 | Surge |
46.2% | 2185 | 70 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 3 | Cordelius |
46.2% | 2093 | 70 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 12 | Willow |
46.6% | 1211 | 61 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – | Gene |
45.9% | 2320 | 71 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – | Starr Nova |
46.2% | 1713 | 67 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 2 | Mina |
46.3% | 1152 | 61 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 1 | Chester |
45.6% | 2400 | 72 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 5 | Max |
45.6% | 2152 | 70 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 3 | Frank |
45.6% | 1859 | 68 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 1 | Mortis |
45.1% | 3120 | 76 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 3 | Meg |
45.5% | 1334 | 63 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 2 | Dynamike |
44.6% | 2275 | 71 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 5 | Melodie |
44.9% | 1259 | 62 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 3 | Clancy |
45.1% | 887 | 57 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 2 | Shade |
44.2% | 2187 | 70 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 1 | Ollie |
44.9% | 769 | 55 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – | Stu |
44.0% | 2754 | 74 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 4 | Draco |
44.1% | 803 | 55 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Sam |
43.8% | 1144 | 61 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 1 | Shelly |
42.7% | 4519 | 81 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 5 | Bolt |
43.6% | 872 | 56 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 2 | Hank |
43.5% | 1001 | 59 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Sandy |
42.0% | 884 | 57 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – | Doug |
41.5% | 1252 | 62 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – | Ash |
41.3% | 989 | 58 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Kaze |
40.7% | 1745 | 67 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Damian |
40.9% | 771 | 55 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Chuck |
40.4% | 902 | 57 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Nita |
39.5% | 2718 | 73 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 2 | Trunk |
38.5% | 847 | 56 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 1 | Poco |
38.1% | 2737 | 74 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 1 | Bull |
37.1% | 3252 | 76 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 2 | Jacky |
36.3% | 1280 | 62 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | El Primo |
35.4% | 2653 | 73 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Barley |
34.4% | 1965 | 69 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Rosa |
28.3% | 1730 | 67 | 0.7% | Rather not |