
Duo Showdown
46,471 battles collected on this map.
Showdown has no win or loss — the API only reports the placement. The percentage here says how often the battle ended with a trophy gain (place 1–2 of 5 teams; from the next place down it costs trophies). It cannot be compared with a win rate — the brawlers can be compared with each other.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest two-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the two brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 490 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 601 real line-ups. In Showdown this counts a trophy gain, not a win.
What you see here. The best two-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 490 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 601 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Top-2 rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ▲ 1 | Nori |
66.9% | 166 | 32 | 6.5% | Solid | ||
| 2 | ▲ 3 | Griff |
71.6% | 67 | 18 | 2.6% | Solid | ||
| 3 | ▲ 26 | Bo |
78.4% | 37 | 9 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 4 | ▼ 3 | Pierce |
70.9% | 55 | 15 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 5 | ▼ 1 | Meg |
68.9% | 61 | 17 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 6 | ▼ 6 | 8-Bit |
73.7% | 38 | 10 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 7 | ▼ 3 | Brock |
67.7% | 62 | 17 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 8 | ▲ 1 | Starr Nova |
65.9% | 82 | 21 | 3.2% | Rather not | ||
| 9 | ▲ 4 | Max |
74.2% | 31 | 7 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 10 | ▲ 2 | Pearl |
83.3% | 18 | 0 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 11 | ▼ 3 | Bolt |
86.7% | 15 | 0 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 12 | ▲ 7 | Stu |
71.0% | 31 | 7 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 13 | ▲ 9 | Glowy |
76.2% | 21 | 1 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 14 | ▼ 6 | Penny |
73.9% | 23 | 2 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 15 | ▼ 9 | Fang |
66.7% | 42 | 11 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 16 | ▼ 1 | Edgar |
62.8% | 86 | 22 | 3.4% | Rather not | ||
| 17 | ▼ 7 | Otis |
72.7% | 22 | 1 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 18 | ▼ 4 | Amber |
66.7% | 36 | 9 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 19 | ▼ 12 | Spike |
66.7% | 36 | 9 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 20 | ▼ 9 | Gray |
67.7% | 31 | 7 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 21 | ▲ 12 | Piper |
67.7% | 31 | 7 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 22 | ▲ 3 | Lou |
81.8% | 11 | 0 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 23 | ▲ 32 | Lumi |
72.2% | 18 | 0 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 24 | ▼ 9 | Tick |
66.7% | 30 | 6 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 25 | ▲ 5 | Emz |
63.0% | 54 | 15 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 26 | ▼ 5 | Angelo |
66.7% | 27 | 4 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 27 | ▲ 8 | Najia |
68.2% | 22 | 1 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 28 | ▼ 2 | Lily |
64.1% | 39 | 10 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 29 | ▲ 13 | Carl |
75.0% | 12 | 0 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 30 | ▼ 8 | Kenji |
66.7% | 24 | 3 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 31 | ▲ 8 | Cordelius |
63.6% | 33 | 7 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 32 | ▲ 8 | Sirius |
68.8% | 16 | 0 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 33 | ▲ 46 | Kit |
61.7% | 47 | 13 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 34 | ▼ 11 | Juju |
69.2% | 13 | 0 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 35 | ▼ 10 | Pam |
69.2% | 13 | 0 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 36 | ▼ 16 | Ruffs |
65.0% | 20 | 0 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 37 | ▼ 3 | Chester |
64.7% | 17 | 0 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 38 | ▼ 11 | Charlie |
66.7% | 12 | 0 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 39 | ▲ 7 | Gale |
62.5% | 24 | 3 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 40 | ▲ 12 | Kaze |
60.0% | 55 | 15 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 41 | ▼ 4 | Bibi |
60.5% | 43 | 11 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 42 | ▼ 11 | Frank |
64.3% | 14 | 0 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 43 | ▼ 4 | Meeple |
60.7% | 28 | 5 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 44 | ▼ 4 | R-T |
62.5% | 16 | 0 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 45 | ▲ 4 | Squeak |
58.9% | 56 | 15 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 46 | ▲ 21 | Leon |
60.0% | 25 | 3 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 47 | ▼ 3 | Belle |
61.5% | 13 | 0 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | ▼ 21 | Jessie |
59.1% | 22 | 1 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | ▼ 7 | Mico |
59.1% | 22 | 1 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▼ 17 | Buzz |
56.3% | 16 | 0 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▲ 8 | Shade |
54.5% | 11 | 0 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▼ 8 | Lola |
55.6% | 18 | 0 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 11 | Maisie |
53.8% | 13 | 0 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▲ 5 | Crow |
55.9% | 59 | 16 | 2.3% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▲ 1 | Mina |
55.3% | 47 | 13 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▼ 5 | Colette |
54.3% | 35 | 8 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▲ 2 | Mortis |
55.2% | 67 | 18 | 2.6% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▲ 1 | Dynamike |
52.2% | 23 | 2 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▼ 7 | Surge |
55.1% | 78 | 20 | 3.0% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 1 | Tara |
45.5% | 11 | 0 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 10 | Alli |
50.0% | 20 | 0 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▼ 13 | Bea |
50.0% | 22 | 1 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▲ 5 | Chuck |
40.0% | 10 | 0 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 16 | Poco |
40.0% | 10 | 0 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 9 | Bull |
41.7% | 12 | 0 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 5 | Mandy |
50.0% | 30 | 6 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 6 | Gene |
30.0% | 10 | 0 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 4 | Rico |
47.7% | 44 | 12 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 2 | Finx |
25.0% | 12 | 0 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 12 | Byron |
46.3% | 41 | 11 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 1 | Shelly |
31.0% | 29 | 6 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 1 | Colt |
43.3% | 90 | 23 | 3.5% | Rather not |