
Trio Showdown
5,454 battles collected on this map.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 59 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
Showdown has no win or loss — the API only reports the placement. The percentage here says how often the battle ended with a trophy gain (place 1–2 of 4 teams; from the next place down it costs trophies). It cannot be compared with a win rate — the brawlers can be compared with each other.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 7,310 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 544 real line-ups. In Showdown this counts a trophy gain, not a win.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 7,310 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 544 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (92 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
73.8% | 1186 | 61 | 1.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | ▼ 1 | Nori |
63.9% | 2547 | 73 | 3.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | ▼ 1 | Starr Nova |
63.1% | 642 | 52 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▼ 5 | Mortis |
61.8% | 820 | 56 | 1.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▲ 13 | Bolt |
65.8% | 357 | 43 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▲ 8 | Ziggy |
71.6% | 155 | 31 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 7 | ▼ 13 | Kit |
60.7% | 608 | 51 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 6 | Angelo |
66.8% | 190 | 34 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 9 | ▲ 15 | Pierce |
61.3% | 395 | 45 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 10 | ▲ 13 | Kaze |
63.7% | 256 | 38 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | ▲ 14 | Mico |
64.2% | 232 | 37 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 33 | Damian |
73.0% | 111 | 26 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▼ 13 | Gus |
62.3% | 297 | 40 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▼ 4 | Lumi |
64.2% | 218 | 36 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 3 | Chester |
60.3% | 350 | 43 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 18 | Gray |
62.4% | 245 | 37 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▼ 27 | Bo |
58.1% | 492 | 48 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▼ 1 | Meg |
55.8% | 1074 | 60 | 1.6% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▲ 41 | R-T |
69.6% | 112 | 26 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▲ 78 | Jae-Yong |
62.6% | 190 | 34 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 9 | Mina |
62.4% | 189 | 34 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | – | Mandy |
56.4% | 541 | 49 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 22 | Alli |
63.6% | 151 | 30 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▲ 41 | Nani |
58.6% | 297 | 40 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▲ 5 | Doug |
58.7% | 286 | 40 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▼ 21 | Shade |
57.9% | 302 | 41 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▼ 2 | Stu |
56.3% | 416 | 45 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | ▲ 15 | Meeple |
58.1% | 258 | 38 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | ▲ 1 | Amber |
58.4% | 238 | 37 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▲ 19 | Glowy |
59.2% | 196 | 34 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▲ 31 | Sirius |
56.2% | 338 | 42 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▲ 5 | Finx |
64.5% | 107 | 25 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▲ 2 | Penny |
53.5% | 694 | 53 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▲ 29 | Najia |
59.4% | 165 | 32 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 8 | Tick |
52.6% | 865 | 56 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▲ 39 | Sprout |
56.6% | 226 | 36 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▲ 10 | Byron |
52.4% | 759 | 54 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▲ 30 | Trunk |
58.6% | 145 | 30 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▼ 16 | Brock |
50.6% | 1860 | 68 | 2.8% | Solid | ||
| 40 | NEW | Juju |
61.4% | 101 | 24 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▼ 16 | Piper |
51.1% | 1189 | 61 | 1.8% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▲ 40 | Gigi |
60.2% | 113 | 26 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▲ 37 | Draco |
60.4% | 101 | 24 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▲ 13 | Squeak |
51.4% | 690 | 53 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▲ 23 | Moe |
58.9% | 107 | 25 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 19 | Ruffs |
55.1% | 158 | 31 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 48 | Lola |
54.2% | 179 | 33 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 19 | Chuck |
60.3% | 73 | 19 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▲ 15 | Janet |
54.1% | 159 | 31 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▲ 11 | Emz |
48.8% | 1614 | 66 | 2.5% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▼ 15 | Griff |
49.0% | 1252 | 62 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▲ 17 | Sam |
55.7% | 115 | 26 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▼ 42 | Edgar |
47.9% | 3731 | 78 | 5.7% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▼ 19 | Carl |
49.6% | 740 | 54 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 55 | ▼ 8 | Jessie |
49.2% | 669 | 53 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 56 | ▼ 18 | Bibi |
48.6% | 1023 | 59 | 1.6% | Solid | ||
| 57 | ▼ 24 | Ash |
49.5% | 420 | 46 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 29 | 8-Bit |
47.7% | 1329 | 63 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▼ 22 | Poco |
48.3% | 693 | 53 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 33 | Pearl |
48.7% | 536 | 49 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▼ 2 | Colt |
47.3% | 1744 | 67 | 2.7% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 6 | Fang |
48.3% | 698 | 53 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 5 | Otis |
48.5% | 546 | 49 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▲ 5 | Maisie |
49.0% | 402 | 45 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 16 | Hank |
52.1% | 117 | 26 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 3 | Spike |
47.3% | 1259 | 62 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 5 | Bonnie |
48.9% | 362 | 43 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 24 | Rosa |
48.3% | 472 | 47 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – | Willow |
50.7% | 140 | 29 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 32 | Surge |
46.6% | 1512 | 65 | 2.3% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 22 | Pam |
47.7% | 459 | 47 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 20 | Leon |
46.5% | 1141 | 60 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 1 | Belle |
47.0% | 489 | 48 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 8 | Lou |
46.6% | 459 | 47 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 24 | Frank |
45.8% | 990 | 58 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 11 | Kenji |
45.8% | 939 | 58 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 8 | Nita |
45.6% | 1111 | 60 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 7 | Gale |
46.1% | 544 | 49 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 11 | Colette |
45.5% | 802 | 55 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 10 | Rico |
44.8% | 1468 | 64 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 3 | Sandy |
45.3% | 424 | 46 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 12 | Dynamike |
44.4% | 1012 | 59 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 1 | Crow |
44.1% | 1389 | 63 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 7 | Bea |
44.5% | 650 | 52 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 47 | Shelly |
43.6% | 1895 | 68 | 2.9% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 35 | Lily |
44.3% | 573 | 50 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 23 | Cordelius |
44.2% | 626 | 52 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 3 | Berry |
44.4% | 455 | 47 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 32 | Darryl |
43.9% | 663 | 52 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 8 | Max |
43.7% | 893 | 57 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 9 | Gene |
43.7% | 391 | 44 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 1 | Barley |
43.4% | 519 | 49 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 3 | Tara |
43.1% | 801 | 55 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 42 | Melodie |
43.0% | 377 | 44 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 31 | Charlie |
42.7% | 384 | 44 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 10 | Clancy |
41.3% | 351 | 43 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Eve |
41.0% | 344 | 43 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▲ 7 | Buster |
40.5% | 299 | 40 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▼ 10 | Mr. P |
40.7% | 427 | 46 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 10 | Bull |
40.5% | 818 | 56 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 9 | Jacky |
39.8% | 377 | 44 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▲ 2 | Larry & Lawrie |
39.4% | 416 | 45 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 2 | Buzz |
38.9% | 581 | 50 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 5 | El Primo |
38.7% | 977 | 58 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▼ 3 | Grom |
37.6% | 386 | 44 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | ▼ 8 | Ollie |
36.4% | 264 | 39 | 0.4% | Rather not |