
Hot Zone
286,733 battles collected on this map.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 8,295 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 1,045 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 8,295 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 1,045 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (3 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
72.7% | 3872 | 79 | 1.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Starr Nova |
68.0% | 1562 | 65 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Damian |
69.5% | 876 | 57 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Draco |
65.1% | 4996 | 83 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▲ 1 | Doug |
64.3% | 8083 | 90 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▲ 2 | Amber |
64.0% | 4790 | 82 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Nori |
64.3% | 3772 | 78 | 1.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Sirius |
62.7% | 16467 | 100 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▲ 2 | Finx |
63.4% | 5818 | 85 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▼ 1 | Trunk |
63.6% | 4246 | 80 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▼ 1 | Bo |
63.0% | 4418 | 81 | 2.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▼ 1 | Mina |
61.8% | 8677 | 91 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | ▼ 1 | Chuck |
62.4% | 4112 | 80 | 1.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 14 | – | Glowy |
61.6% | 5867 | 85 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 1 | Pierce |
60.7% | 19947 | 100 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 16 | – | Bolt |
64.5% | 1005 | 59 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 1 | R-T |
62.2% | 2603 | 73 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 18 | ▼ 2 | Sprout |
61.0% | 4750 | 82 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 19 | ▲ 10 | Gus |
60.3% | 9428 | 92 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 20 | – | Kaze |
60.6% | 5231 | 83 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 3 | Chester |
60.1% | 7800 | 89 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 22 | ▼ 3 | Moe |
60.7% | 3789 | 78 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 3 | Gigi |
60.7% | 3701 | 78 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 24 | ▼ 3 | Gray |
59.5% | 12351 | 96 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 25 | ▼ 6 | Juju |
59.9% | 3247 | 76 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 26 | ▲ 4 | Shade |
60.5% | 1574 | 65 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▼ 2 | Stu |
58.4% | 7478 | 89 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | ▼ 1 | Nani |
57.8% | 6286 | 86 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | – | Sam |
58.0% | 3555 | 77 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | ▼ 1 | Tick |
55.7% | 126594 | 100 | 7.6% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | ▲ 3 | Janetpre-patch |
57.1% | 3642 | 78 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 32 | ▲ 1 | Najia |
56.6% | 3858 | 79 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 33 | ▼ 2 | Kenji |
55.2% | 44583 | 100 | 2.7% | Good pick | ||
| 34 | ▼ 2 | Meeple |
56.4% | 3981 | 79 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 35 | – | Meg |
56.7% | 2644 | 73 | 1.4% | Good pick | ||
| 36 | ▼ 2 | Lumi |
58.5% | 967 | 58 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 37 | – | Alli |
56.9% | 2184 | 70 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 38 | ▲ 1 | Poco |
55.3% | 9135 | 92 | 2.2% | Good pick | ||
| 39 | – | Angelo |
55.6% | 2579 | 73 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 40 | ▲ 1 | Emz |
53.8% | 64516 | 100 | 3.8% | Good pick | ||
| 41 | ▲ 1 | Kit |
54.4% | 11077 | 94 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 42 | ▼ 2 | Mico |
55.5% | 2791 | 74 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 43 | – | Hank |
58.9% | 576 | 50 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 44 | – | Mortis |
53.8% | 28992 | 100 | 1.7% | Good pick | ||
| 45 | ▲ 1 | Lola |
57.8% | 536 | 49 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▲ 1 | Ruffs |
58.4% | 452 | 47 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 47 | – | Bibi |
52.7% | 37013 | 100 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 48 | – | Griff |
53.7% | 4449 | 81 | 2.6% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 1 | Jae-Yong |
57.8% | 431 | 46 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▲ 7 | El Primo |
52.6% | 4180 | 80 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 51 | – | Jessie |
52.7% | 3862 | 79 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 52 | – | Berry |
51.6% | 31330 | 100 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 53 | – | Penny |
51.3% | 41052 | 100 | 2.4% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▲ 1 | Willow |
52.6% | 2938 | 75 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 55 | ▼ 1 | Mandy |
51.6% | 12066 | 96 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 56 | – | Lou |
50.8% | 20609 | 100 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 57 | – | Squeak |
49.4% | 39341 | 100 | 2.4% | Solid | ||
| 58 | ▼ 4 | Ziggy |
52.0% | 686 | 53 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 59 | – | Pam |
48.6% | 10269 | 93 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 60 | ▲ 4 | 8-Bit |
48.9% | 4248 | 80 | 1.6% | Solid | ||
| 61 | ▲ 2 | Colette |
47.9% | 2179 | 70 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 1 | Fang |
45.4% | 17422 | 100 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 1 | Tara |
46.5% | 1363 | 63 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | Nita |
46.0% | 2247 | 71 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | – | Ash |
46.6% | 1030 | 59 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 2 | Spike |
44.4% | 25802 | 100 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 2 | Barley |
43.9% | 23658 | 100 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | – | Gale |
44.0% | 13161 | 97 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 1 | Frank |
43.2% | 27097 | 100 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 1 | Edgar |
42.9% | 49733 | 100 | 2.9% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – | Eve |
44.6% | 811 | 55 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 2 | Clancy |
44.3% | 1403 | 64 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 1 | Larry & Lawrie |
42.7% | 9414 | 92 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – | Surge |
42.7% | 2281 | 71 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Carl |
41.4% | 14548 | 99 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▲ 1 | Sandy |
41.2% | 13681 | 98 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Bull |
40.2% | 16609 | 100 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 3 | Piper |
40.2% | 12296 | 96 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 1 | Maisie |
41.0% | 952 | 58 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 2 | Crow |
40.4% | 2387 | 72 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 1 | Pearl |
39.2% | 9136 | 92 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Rosa |
38.5% | 11492 | 95 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 1 | Brock |
38.9% | 2835 | 74 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | Rico |
38.8% | 2005 | 69 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 1 | Belle |
37.6% | 6278 | 86 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 2 | Melodie |
36.4% | 767 | 55 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 1 | Shelly |
36.2% | 16859 | 100 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Buster |
36.1% | 869 | 56 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 2 | Buzz |
35.8% | 6943 | 88 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | Leon |
35.6% | 1005 | 59 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 1 | Grom |
35.5% | 9854 | 93 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Bea |
35.6% | 1063 | 59 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 2 | Max |
35.4% | 1048 | 59 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – | Jacky |
35.2% | 1133 | 60 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 1 | Colt |
34.8% | 20896 | 100 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 1 | Byron |
34.6% | 14966 | 99 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 3 | Dynamike |
33.8% | 2570 | 73 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Mr. P |
33.0% | 6815 | 87 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Otis |
30.0% | 6295 | 86 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Ollie |
29.3% | 3973 | 79 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 1 | Cordelius |
29.2% | 6567 | 87 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 1 | Lily |
29.1% | 7193 | 88 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Bonnie |
28.3% | 5698 | 85 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Darryl |
28.0% | 11895 | 96 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Charlie |
27.3% | 5848 | 85 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
24.1% | 6271 | 86 | 0.4% | Rather not |