
Hot Zone
284,870 battles collected on this map.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 7,937 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 1,041 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 7,937 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 1,041 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (3 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
72.5% | 3689 | 78 | 1.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Starr Nova |
68.1% | 1495 | 65 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Damian |
69.5% | 834 | 56 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Draco |
65.0% | 4946 | 82 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▲ 1 | Doug |
64.3% | 8018 | 90 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Nori |
64.3% | 3612 | 78 | 1.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 2 | Amber |
64.0% | 4562 | 81 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▲ 3 | Finx |
63.4% | 5772 | 85 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▼ 1 | Sirius |
62.6% | 16390 | 100 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▼ 1 | Trunk |
63.5% | 4205 | 80 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▼ 1 | Bo |
62.8% | 4213 | 80 | 2.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▼ 1 | Mina |
61.8% | 8631 | 91 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | ▼ 1 | Chuck |
62.2% | 3896 | 79 | 1.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 14 | ▲ 1 | Glowy |
61.6% | 5816 | 85 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 15 | ▼ 2 | Jae-Yongpre-patch |
62.5% | 2788 | 74 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 1 | Pierce |
60.7% | 19828 | 100 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 1 | R-T |
62.2% | 2583 | 73 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 18 | – | Bolt |
64.3% | 957 | 58 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 19 | ▼ 2 | Sprout |
61.0% | 4712 | 82 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 20 | ▲ 12 | Gus |
60.2% | 9247 | 92 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 21 | – | Kaze |
60.5% | 5185 | 83 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 22 | ▲ 3 | Chester |
60.1% | 7744 | 89 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 4 | Gigi |
60.7% | 3658 | 78 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 24 | ▼ 4 | Moe |
60.7% | 3764 | 78 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 25 | ▼ 3 | Gray |
59.6% | 12307 | 96 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 26 | ▼ 4 | Juju |
59.9% | 3228 | 76 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 27 | ▼ 2 | Stu |
58.4% | 7420 | 89 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | ▲ 2 | Shade |
60.3% | 1508 | 65 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | ▼ 2 | Nani |
57.8% | 6264 | 86 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | ▼ 1 | Sam |
57.9% | 3529 | 77 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | ▼ 1 | Tick |
55.7% | 126104 | 100 | 7.6% | Good pick | ||
| 32 | ▲ 1 | Janetpre-patch |
57.1% | 3616 | 78 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 33 | ▲ 2 | Najia |
56.6% | 3801 | 78 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 34 | ▼ 2 | Kenji |
55.2% | 44443 | 100 | 2.7% | Good pick | ||
| 35 | ▼ 1 | Meeple |
56.5% | 3962 | 79 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 36 | – | Meg |
56.7% | 2504 | 72 | 1.4% | Good pick | ||
| 37 | – | Alli |
56.9% | 2166 | 70 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 38 | ▲ 1 | Poco |
55.4% | 8686 | 91 | 2.2% | Good pick | ||
| 39 | ▼ 3 | Lumi |
58.3% | 928 | 57 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 40 | – | Angelo |
55.8% | 2566 | 73 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 41 | ▲ 1 | Emz |
53.8% | 64122 | 100 | 3.8% | Good pick | ||
| 42 | ▲ 1 | Kit |
54.4% | 11037 | 94 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 43 | ▼ 2 | Mico |
55.4% | 2774 | 74 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 44 | – | Mortis |
53.8% | 28875 | 100 | 1.7% | Good pick | ||
| 45 | – | Hank |
58.6% | 548 | 50 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 46 | ▲ 2 | Ruffs |
59.0% | 442 | 46 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 1 | Lola |
58.1% | 511 | 48 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 48 | – | Bibi |
52.7% | 36858 | 100 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 49 | – | Griff |
53.7% | 4255 | 80 | 2.6% | Solid | ||
| 50 | – | Berry |
51.6% | 31109 | 100 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▲ 7 | El Primo |
52.6% | 3945 | 79 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 52 | – | Jessie |
52.6% | 3670 | 78 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 53 | – | Penny |
51.4% | 40812 | 100 | 2.4% | Solid | ||
| 54 | – | Mandy |
51.5% | 12016 | 96 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 55 | – | Willow |
52.5% | 2919 | 75 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 56 | – | Lou |
50.8% | 20494 | 100 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 57 | – | Squeak |
49.4% | 39163 | 100 | 2.4% | Solid | ||
| 58 | ▼ 4 | Ziggy |
52.0% | 652 | 52 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 59 | – | Pam |
48.6% | 10181 | 93 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 60 | ▲ 4 | 8-Bit |
48.8% | 4043 | 79 | 1.6% | Solid | ||
| 61 | ▲ 2 | Colette |
48.1% | 2087 | 70 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 1 | Fang |
45.3% | 17275 | 100 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Ash |
47.1% | 962 | 58 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | Nita |
46.0% | 2109 | 70 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 1 | Tara |
46.2% | 1301 | 62 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 2 | Spike |
44.5% | 25630 | 100 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 2 | Barley |
43.9% | 23497 | 100 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | – | Gale |
43.9% | 13096 | 97 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▲ 1 | Frank |
43.1% | 26935 | 100 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | – | Eve |
44.7% | 780 | 55 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 1 | Edgar |
42.8% | 49429 | 100 | 2.9% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 1 | Clancy |
44.2% | 1329 | 63 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 1 | Larry & Lawrie |
42.7% | 9357 | 92 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – | Surge |
42.9% | 2178 | 70 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Carl |
41.3% | 14447 | 98 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▲ 1 | Sandy |
41.2% | 13584 | 98 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 3 | Crow |
40.9% | 2259 | 71 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Bull |
40.2% | 16489 | 100 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 1 | Maisie |
41.1% | 907 | 57 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 3 | Piper |
40.2% | 12230 | 96 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – | Pearl |
39.1% | 9063 | 91 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Rosa |
38.5% | 11418 | 95 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | Rico |
38.8% | 1922 | 68 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 1 | Brock |
38.7% | 2691 | 73 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – | Belle |
37.6% | 6226 | 86 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 2 | Melodie |
36.6% | 735 | 54 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 1 | Shelly |
36.2% | 16754 | 100 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Buster |
35.8% | 824 | 56 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 1 | Max |
35.9% | 987 | 58 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | Leon |
35.8% | 960 | 58 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Jacky |
35.7% | 1077 | 60 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▲ 2 | Buzz |
35.7% | 6890 | 87 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – | Bea |
35.7% | 1015 | 59 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 1 | Grom |
35.4% | 9795 | 93 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 1 | Colt |
34.8% | 20767 | 100 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 1 | Byron |
34.6% | 14867 | 99 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 4 | Dynamike |
34.0% | 2464 | 72 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Mr. P |
33.0% | 6769 | 87 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Otis |
29.9% | 6242 | 86 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Ollie |
29.3% | 3933 | 79 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 1 | Cordelius |
29.3% | 6510 | 87 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 1 | Lily |
29.1% | 7139 | 88 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Bonnie |
28.4% | 5644 | 84 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Darryl |
28.0% | 11797 | 95 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Charlie |
27.2% | 5812 | 85 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
24.1% | 6229 | 86 | 0.4% | Rather not |