Hot Zone

Golden Bay

219,107 battles collected on this map.

OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 56 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Controller 34929 games

Damage Dealer 14052 games

Damage Dealer 1846 games

Controller 7463 games

Damage Dealer 2835 games

Damage Dealer 5604 games

Damage Dealer 5537 games

Damage Dealer 2878 games

Artillery 104753 games

Controller 34264 games

Controller 50409 games

Controller 28919 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Hot Zone): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Draco 65.1%Winrate 3,575 games

Damian 64.4%Winrate 4,460 games

Doug 63.6%Winrate 5,674 games

Trunk 63.9%Winrate 2,957 games

Overrated

Edgar 42.4%Winrate 38,361 games

Dynamike 42.8%Winrate 27,615 games

Poco 46.6%Winrate 22,468 games

Frank 42.6%Winrate 20,891 games

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 6,783 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 886 real line-ups.

58.3% expected

57.2% expected

57.0% expected

56.2% expected

56.2% expected

56.1% expected

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 6,783 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 886 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (3 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Wendy	73.3%	21502	100	1.5%	Strong pick
2	–	Hank	71.0%	13222	97	1.1%	Strong pick
3	–	Bolt	68.9%	9167	92	0.6%	Strong pick
4	–	Nori	67.2%	24060	100	1.7%	Strong pick
5	–	Starr Nova	65.2%	13151	97	1.0%	Strong pick
6	▲ 1	Draco	65.1%	3575	78	0.2%	Strong pick
7	▼ 1	Bo	63.1%	34929	100	2.6%	Strong pick
8	–	Damian	64.4%	4460	81	0.3%	Strong pick
9	▲ 3	Doug	63.6%	5674	84	0.4%	Strong pick
10	–	Sirius	62.9%	13230	97	1.1%	Strong pick
11	–	Chuck	62.6%	14052	98	1.1%	Strong pick
12	▼ 3	Trunk	63.9%	2957	75	0.2%	Strong pick
13	–	Mina	62.6%	6805	87	0.5%	Strong pick
14	▲ 1	Jae-Yong	64.2%	1995	69	0.1%	Strong pick
15	▼ 1	Finx	62.8%	4198	80	0.3%	Strong pick
16	–	Sprout	62.8%	3520	77	0.3%	Strong pick
17	▲ 2	Pierce	60.8%	15712	100	1.2%	Strong pick
18	▼ 1	R-T	62.9%	1846	68	0.1%	Strong pick
19	▼ 1	Glowy	61.6%	4044	79	0.3%	Strong pick
20	–	Kaze	61.6%	3755	78	0.3%	Strong pick
21	–	Amber	60.9%	7463	89	0.6%	Strong pick
22	–	Juju	61.8%	2262	71	0.2%	Strong pick
23	▲ 1	Moe	61.3%	2835	74	0.2%	Strong pick
24	▼ 1	Lumi	60.3%	5604	84	0.4%	Strong pick
25	–	Gray	59.8%	10281	93	0.8%	Strong pick
26	–	Ziggy	60.1%	4915	82	0.4%	Strong pick
27	–	Chester	59.7%	5537	84	0.4%	Strong pick
28	▲ 1	Lola	60.4%	2878	74	0.2%	Strong pick
29	▲ 1	Stu	59.3%	5916	85	0.4%	Strong pick
30	▼ 2	Nani	59.3%	5015	83	0.4%	Good pick
31	▲ 1	Gigi	59.9%	2529	72	0.2%	Good pick
32	▼ 1	Shade	58.9%	4095	80	0.3%	Good pick
33	–	Sam	59.2%	2770	74	0.2%	Good pick
34	▲ 2	Gus	58.4%	4212	80	0.3%	Good pick
35	▼ 1	Tick	56.6%	104753	100	8.4%	Good pick
36	▼ 1	Ruffs	58.5%	2497	72	0.2%	Good pick
37	▲ 1	Janet	57.5%	2730	74	0.2%	Good pick
38	▼ 1	Kenji	55.7%	37355	100	3.0%	Good pick
39	–	Alli	58.1%	1486	64	0.1%	Good pick
40	–	Meeple	56.9%	3036	75	0.2%	Good pick
41	▲ 2	Najia	56.9%	2585	73	0.2%	Good pick
42	▼ 1	Angelo	57.3%	1917	68	0.1%	Good pick
43	▼ 1	Griff	55.0%	34264	100	2.6%	Good pick
44	–	Mico	56.2%	2162	70	0.2%	Good pick
45	–	Emz	53.8%	50409	100	3.8%	Good pick
46	–	Kit	54.1%	9427	92	0.8%	Good pick
47	–	Mortis	53.5%	24046	100	1.9%	Good pick
48	–	Bibi	53.4%	30290	100	2.4%	Good pick
49	–	Jessie	53.3%	28919	100	2.2%	Good pick
50	▲ 1	Berry	52.4%	24452	100	1.9%	Solid
51	▼ 1	Meg	52.1%	22935	100	1.4%	Solid
52	–	Penny	51.9%	32646	100	2.5%	Solid
53	–	Mandy	51.6%	9701	93	0.8%	Solid
54	–	Lou	50.9%	15874	100	1.1%	Solid
55	–	Nita	50.6%	19248	100	1.5%	Solid
56	▲ 1	Willow	51.7%	2070	69	0.2%	Solid
57	▼ 1	Squeak	49.8%	31821	100	2.6%	Solid
58	–	Tara	49.3%	9262	92	0.7%	Solid
59	–	Pam	47.4%	7268	88	0.5%	Rather not
60	–	Poco	46.6%	22468	100	1.6%	Rather not
61	–	Eve	46.9%	6736	87	0.5%	Rather not
62	–	Ash	46.0%	9163	92	0.7%	Rather not
63	–	Fang	44.5%	13018	97	0.9%	Rather not
64	–	Spike	44.2%	19688	100	1.5%	Rather not
65	–	Barley	44.1%	17787	100	1.4%	Rather not
66	▲ 1	Melodie	44.3%	8382	90	0.7%	Rather not
67	▼ 1	Colette	43.9%	12440	96	0.9%	Rather not
68	–	Gale	43.5%	10022	93	0.8%	Rather not
69	–	Dynamike	42.8%	27615	100	2.2%	Rather not
70	–	Crow	42.7%	19216	100	1.5%	Rather not
71	▲ 1	Frank	42.6%	20891	100	1.6%	Rather not
72	▼ 1	Edgar	42.4%	38361	100	2.9%	Rather not
73	▲ 1	El Primo	42.1%	17621	100	1.4%	Rather not
74	▼ 1	Larry & Lawrie	42.4%	7087	88	0.5%	Rather not
75	–	Carl	41.6%	11152	95	0.8%	Rather not
76	–	Piper	40.6%	9673	92	0.8%	Rather not
77	–	Bull	40.1%	12722	97	1.0%	Rather not
78	▲ 1	Brock	39.3%	20279	100	1.6%	Rather not
79	▲ 1	Max	39.3%	9953	93	0.8%	Rather not
80	▼ 2	Sandy	39.2%	10040	93	0.7%	Rather not
81	▲ 2	Rosa	39.0%	8717	91	0.7%	Rather not
82	–	8-Bit	38.6%	21452	100	1.5%	Rather not
83	▼ 2	Pearl	38.8%	6843	87	0.5%	Rather not
84	–	Surge	37.9%	16082	100	1.2%	Rather not
85	–	Rico	37.1%	14491	99	1.1%	Rather not
86	–	Belle	36.8%	4706	82	0.4%	Rather not
87	–	Shelly	36.6%	12673	97	1.0%	Rather not
88	–	Clancy	36.1%	7703	89	0.6%	Rather not
89	–	Leon	35.9%	7376	88	0.6%	Rather not
90	▲ 1	Grom	35.2%	7532	89	0.6%	Rather not
91	▼ 1	Colt	34.8%	15862	100	1.2%	Rather not
92	–	Byron	34.3%	11495	95	0.9%	Rather not
93	–	Buzz	34.4%	5079	83	0.4%	Rather not
94	–	Maisie	34.0%	5424	84	0.4%	Rather not
95	–	Mr. P	32.2%	5095	83	0.4%	Rather not
96	–	Jacky	31.9%	7206	88	0.5%	Rather not
97	–	Buster	31.8%	6087	86	0.5%	Rather not
98	–	Ollie	28.7%	2870	74	0.2%	Rather not
99	–	Bea	28.7%	6881	87	0.5%	Rather not
100	▲ 1	Lily	28.6%	5483	84	0.4%	Rather not
101	▲ 1	Bonnie	28.3%	4260	80	0.3%	Rather not
102	▲ 1	Otis	28.0%	4547	81	0.3%	Rather not
103	▼ 3	Cordelius	28.0%	4995	83	0.4%	Rather not
104	▲ 1	Darryl	27.1%	8922	91	0.7%	Rather not
105	▼ 1	Charlie	27.0%	4432	81	0.3%	Rather not
106	–	Gene	23.6%	4796	82	0.4%	Rather not