My roster

Enter your player tag and the site hides everything you cannot play anyway: brawlers you are missing, and those below power 9 — below 11 from Mythic upwards. The tag goes to the official API once and then stays in your browser. It is neither stored nor logged here, and there is no account.

You can find your tag in the game, under your name in your profile.

← Overview

Knockout

Healthy Middle Ground

2,977 battles collected on this map.

MEDIUM — an average amount of choice: 26 of 53 brawlers above 50%.

Trophy Road Healthy Middle GroundKnockout

Recommendation

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean
Strong pick Good pick SolidHow the brawler stands on this map compared to the whole mode (Knockout): Strong pick is the top tenth of all map/brawler rows, Good pick the top quarter, Solid the upper half, Rather not the rest. What is measured is the cautiously computed win rate (Wilson lower bound), the same number the cards are sorted by — not the percentage shown beside it. The thresholds come from the field rather than from fixed percentages: the modes sit at different levels, and in Showdown the number counts trophy gains rather than wins. Not to be confused with the tier list — that ranks a brawler by how many maps of the rotation he is usable on, across all maps together. A Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “played badly”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.
TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.
Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.
Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 6,147 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 316 real line-ups.

1
69.3% expected
2
69.3% expected
3
69.3% expected
4
69.2% expected
5
69.2% expected
6
69.2% expected
How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 6,147 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 316 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (137 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#BrawlerWin rateGamesTrustPick rateRating
1 Starr Nova 72.6%
223 36
1.2% Strong pick
2 Nori 61.6%
575 50
3.2% Good pick
3 Meg 63.2%
367 44
2.1% Good pick
4 Kenji 61.6%
359 43
2.0% Solid
5 Mortis 57.3%
640 52
3.6% Solid
6 Wendy 74.4%
82 21
0.5% Solid
7▲ 1 Sirius 65.4%
127 28
0.7% Solid
8▼ 1 Kaze 63.2%
155 31
0.9% Solid
9 Bolt 63.8%
138 29
0.8% Solid
10 Mandy 56.6%
341 42
1.9% Solid
11 Lumi 68.7%
83 21
0.5% Solid
12 Piper 54.6%
542 49
3.0% Solid
13▲ 2 Pierce 66.7%
90 23
0.5% Solid
14▼ 2 Surge 56.6%
256 38
1.4% Rather not
15 Edgar 51.9%
1432 64
8.0% Rather not
16▲ 23 Angelo 64.8%
91 23
0.5% Rather not
17▼ 1 Damian 65.1%
83 21
0.5% Rather not
18 Mina 58.7%
143 29
0.8% Rather not
19▼ 2 Mr. P 64.9%
77 20
0.4% Rather not
20▼ 1 Moe 65.6%
61 17
0.3% Rather not
21▲ 2 Tick 54.7%
212 35
1.2% Rather not
22▲ 3 Buzz 59.6%
99 24
0.6% Rather not
23▼ 2 Cordelius 59.6%
99 24
0.6% Rather not
24▼ 5 Buster 66.1%
56 15
0.3% Rather not
25▼ 2 Colt 51.1%
650 52
3.6% Rather not
26▲ 5 Lily 55.6%
142 29
0.8% Rather not
27▲ 15 Griff 53.5%
213 35
1.2% Rather not
28▼ 4 Janet 59.3%
81 21
0.5% Rather not
29▼ 3 Gigi 60.6%
71 19
0.4% Rather not
30▼ 2 Spike 53.0%
198 34
1.1% Rather not
31 Otis 60.3%
63 17
0.4% Rather not
32▲ 2 Bull 51.8%
255 38
1.4% Rather not
33▼ 3 Kit 52.6%
196 34
1.1% Rather not
34▼ 5 Pearl 57.0%
86 22
0.5% Rather not
35▼ 8 Ruffs 60.7%
56 15
0.3% Rather not
36 Willow 60.8%
51 14
0.3% Rather not
37▲ 6 Squeak 53.6%
125 27
0.7% Rather not
38▼ 4 Sprout 56.1%
82 21
0.5% Rather not
39▲ 1 Crow 50.8%
250 38
1.4% Rather not
40▲ 1 Byron 52.1%
165 32
0.9% Rather not
41 Clancy 64.7%
34 8
0.2% Rather not
42▼ 5 Doug 53.7%
108 25
0.6% Rather not
43▼ 5 Leon 50.4%
262 38
1.5% Rather not
44▼ 6 Rico 49.7%
348 43
1.9% Rather not
45▲ 1 Meeple 52.7%
93 23
0.5% Rather not
46▼ 2 Lou 54.1%
61 17
0.3% Rather not
47▲ 5 Chester 50.8%
122 27
0.7% Rather not
48▼ 1 Melodie 53.3%
60 16
0.3% Rather not
49▼ 1 Eve 56.8%
37 9
0.2% Rather not
50▲ 9 Max 49.6%
121 27
0.7% Rather not
51▼ 2 Ash 51.8%
56 15
0.3% Rather not
52▲ 6 Sam 52.1%
48 13
0.3% Rather not
53▼ 3 Bibi 47.7%
214 35
1.2% Rather not
54 Fang 48.4%
126 28
0.7% Rather not
55▲ 10 Nani 48.4%
124 27
0.7% Rather not
56▼ 4 Juju 53.3%
30 6
0.2% Rather not
57▼ 5 Alli 49.3%
75 20
0.4% Rather not
58▼ 1 Mico 50.0%
60 16
0.3% Rather not
59 8-Bit 46.9%
288 40
1.6% Rather not
60▲ 2 Gray 48.8%
80 21
0.4% Rather not
61▼ 3 R-T 51.6%
31 7
0.2% Rather not
62▼ 9 Trunk 48.6%
74 20
0.4% Rather not
63▲ 10 Carl 47.6%
126 28
0.7% Rather not
64▲ 2 Maisie 48.5%
66 18
0.4% Rather not
65▼ 3 Glowy 49.0%
49 13
0.3% Rather not
66▼ 4 Penny 47.4%
114 26
0.6% Rather not
67▲ 8 Ziggy 50.0%
30 6
0.2% Rather not
68▼ 1 Finx 48.8%
43 11
0.2% Rather not
69▼ 3 Shelly 45.5%
596 51
3.3% Rather not
70▲ 2 Ollie 48.6%
37 9
0.2% Rather not
71▲ 2 Jae-Yong 46.7%
45 12
0.3% Rather not
72▼ 2 Draco 46.2%
39 10
0.2% Rather not
73▲ 4 Larry & Lawrie 45.6%
68 18
0.4% Rather not
74 Berry 45.5%
77 20
0.4% Rather not
75▼ 8 Najia 45.5%
55 15
0.3% Rather not
76▼ 7 Belle 45.3%
75 20
0.4% Rather not
77▲ 2 Frank 44.4%
306 41
1.7% Rather not
78 Bo 44.2%
249 38
1.4% Rather not
79▲ 1 Darryl 44.1%
136 29
0.8% Rather not
80▲ 4 Charlie 42.9%
49 13
0.3% Rather not
81▼ 6 Grom 42.9%
77 20
0.4% Rather not
82▲ 5 Shade 43.0%
93 23
0.5% Rather not
83▲ 2 Bonnie 42.7%
75 20
0.4% Rather not
84▼ 2 Bea 43.4%
198 34
1.1% Rather not
85▲ 1 Brock 43.3%
460 47
2.6% Rather not
86▼ 5 Colette 42.9%
140 29
0.8% Rather not
87▼ 4 Gene 41.2%
68 18
0.4% Rather not
88 Sandy 39.6%
53 15
0.3% Rather not
89 Stu 42.2%
180 33
1.0% Rather not
90 Dynamike 42.4%
229 36
1.3% Rather not
91 Emz 41.1%
367 44
2.1% Rather not
92 Lola 34.8%
66 18
0.4% Rather not
93 Tara 37.5%
104 25
0.6% Rather not
94▲ 1 Gale 35.3%
85 22
0.5% Rather not
95▼ 1 Nita 39.1%
350 43
2.0% Rather not
96 Chuck 22.0%
41 11
0.2% Rather not
97▲ 1 Amber 31.9%
91 23
0.5% Rather not
98▼ 1 Pam 31.9%
91 23
0.5% Rather not
99▲ 3 Rosa 34.4%
160 31
0.9% Rather not
100▼ 1 Hank 24.6%
57 16
0.3% Rather not
101▼ 1 Gus 31.4%
118 27
0.7% Rather not
102▼ 1 Poco 33.2%
250 38
1.4% Rather not
103 El Primo 33.0%
351 43
2.0% Rather not
104 Jacky 26.5%
162 31
0.9% Rather not
105▲ 1 Jessie 24.7%
162 31
0.9% Rather not
106▼ 1 Barley 26.6%
207 35
1.2% Rather not