My roster

Enter your player tag and the site hides everything you cannot play anyway: brawlers you are missing, and those below power 9 — below 11 from Mythic upwards. The tag goes to the official API once and then stays in your browser. It is neither stored nor logged here, and there is no account.

You can find your tag in the game, under your name in your profile.

← Overview

Knockout

Healthy Middle Ground

2,296 battles collected on this map.

MEDIUM — an average amount of choice: 19 of 43 brawlers above 50%.

Trophy Road Healthy Middle GroundKnockout

Recommendation

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean
Good pick SolidHow the brawler stands on this map compared to the whole mode (Knockout): Strong pick is the top tenth of all map/brawler rows, Good pick the top quarter, Solid the upper half, Rather not the rest. What is measured is the cautiously computed win rate (Wilson lower bound), the same number the cards are sorted by — not the percentage shown beside it. The thresholds come from the field rather than from fixed percentages: the modes sit at different levels, and in Showdown the number counts trophy gains rather than wins. Not to be confused with the tier list — that ranks a brawler by how many maps of the rotation he is usable on, across all maps together. A Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “played badly”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.
TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.
Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.
Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 9,328 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 472 real line-ups.

1
67.5% expected
2
67.5% expected
3
67.5% expected
4
67.4% expected
5
67.3% expected
6
67.3% expected
How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 9,328 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 472 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (245 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#BrawlerWin rateGamesTrustPick rateRating
1 Starr Nova 73.8%
183 33
1.3% Good pick
2 Meg 63.7%
322 42
2.3% Good pick
3 Nori 62.1%
414 45
3.0% Good pick
4 Mortis 58.9%
538 49
3.9% Solid
5 Kenji 61.3%
310 41
2.3% Solid
6 Kaze 65.0%
137 29
1.0% Solid
7▲ 1 Wendy 81.6%
49 13
0.4% Solid
8▼ 1 Lumi 70.7%
75 20
0.5% Solid
9 Sirius 65.1%
106 25
0.8% Solid
10 Mandy 56.5%
285 40
2.1% Solid
11▲ 1 Edgar 52.4%
1091 60
7.9% Solid
12▲ 1 Bolt 62.5%
112 26
0.8% Rather not
13▼ 2 Piper 54.2%
441 46
3.2% Rather not
14 Mr. P 68.7%
67 18
0.5% Rather not
15▲ 1 Surge 55.0%
222 36
1.6% Rather not
16▼ 1 Damian 63.9%
72 19
0.5% Rather not
17 Moe 67.9%
53 15
0.4% Rather not
18 Tick 55.8%
163 31
1.2% Rather not
19▲ 2 Byron 56.4%
133 28
1.0% Rather not
20▲ 4 Otis 67.4%
46 12
0.3% Rather not
21▲ 1 Lily 57.1%
112 26
0.8% Rather not
22▲ 1 Cordelius 59.5%
79 21
0.6% Rather not
23▼ 3 Buzz 60.6%
71 19
0.5% Rather not
24▼ 5 Buster 65.3%
49 13
0.4% Rather not
25 Spike 53.5%
157 31
1.1% Rather not
26 Colt 49.9%
469 47
3.4% Rather not
27▲ 3 Leon 51.9%
210 35
1.5% Rather not
28▼ 1 Janet 58.2%
67 18
0.5% Rather not
29 Crow 51.8%
197 34
1.4% Rather not
30▲ 1 Ruffs 62.8%
43 11
0.3% Rather not
31▼ 3 Pierce 57.8%
64 17
0.5% Rather not
32▲ 3 Squeak 54.7%
95 23
0.7% Rather not
33 Meeple 55.8%
77 20
0.6% Rather not
34▲ 8 Angelo 56.3%
64 17
0.5% Rather not
35▼ 3 Gigi 58.3%
48 13
0.3% Rather not
36 Willow 60.0%
40 10
0.3% Rather not
37▼ 3 Sprout 55.2%
67 18
0.5% Rather not
38▼ 1 Clancy 66.7%
24 3
0.2% Rather not
39▼ 1 Juju 70.0%
20 0
0.1% Rather not
40▲ 1 Kit 50.6%
156 31
1.1% Rather not
41▼ 2 Rico 48.9%
276 39
2.0% Rather not
42▼ 2 8-Bit 49.3%
207 35
1.5% Rather not
43 Pearl 54.2%
59 16
0.4% Rather not
44▲ 1 Alli 54.4%
57 16
0.4% Rather not
45▼ 1 Chester 51.6%
95 23
0.7% Rather not
46 Draco 61.5%
26 4
0.2% Rather not
47 Mina 51.1%
92 23
0.7% Rather not
48 Eve 58.6%
29 6
0.2% Rather not
49 Gray 52.5%
61 17
0.4% Rather not
50 Sam 54.8%
42 11
0.3% Rather not
51 Shelly 47.0%
479 48
3.5% Rather not
52 Penny 50.7%
73 19
0.5% Rather not
53 Doug 49.4%
81 21
0.6% Rather not
54▲ 3 Bibi 47.8%
159 31
1.2% Rather not
55▲ 4 Fang 48.5%
103 25
0.7% Rather not
56 Max 48.5%
99 24
0.7% Rather not
57▲ 6 Najia 51.2%
43 11
0.3% Rather not
58▼ 4 Jae-Yong 51.4%
35 8
0.3% Rather not
59▲ 1 Ash 50.0%
44 12
0.3% Rather not
60▲ 1 Lou 50.0%
44 12
0.3% Rather not
61▼ 3 Belle 49.1%
53 15
0.4% Rather not
62▲ 3 Griff 46.9%
147 30
1.1% Rather not
63▲ 3 Bull 46.7%
180 33
1.3% Rather not
64▲ 3 R-T 52.6%
19 0
0.1% Rather not
65▼ 10 Melodie 48.9%
45 12
0.3% Rather not
66▲ 2 Trunk 48.2%
56 15
0.4% Rather not
67▼ 5 Mico 48.8%
43 11
0.3% Rather not
68▼ 4 Maisie 48.1%
54 15
0.4% Rather not
69 Ollie 47.8%
23 2
0.2% Rather not
70 Finx 47.1%
34 8
0.2% Rather not
71 Glowy 46.9%
32 7
0.2% Rather not
72▲ 3 Larry & Lawrie 46.2%
52 14
0.4% Rather not
73▼ 1 Colette 45.4%
108 25
0.8% Rather not
74▲ 2 Tara 44.9%
78 20
0.6% Rather not
75▼ 1 Bonnie 44.2%
52 14
0.4% Rather not
76▼ 3 Berry 43.9%
66 18
0.5% Rather not
77▲ 1 Frank 44.1%
238 37
1.7% Rather not
78▲ 6 Carl 43.6%
94 23
0.7% Rather not
79▲ 1 Bea 43.8%
160 31
1.2% Rather not
80▲ 5 Gene 42.3%
52 14
0.4% Rather not
81 Nani 43.0%
93 23
0.7% Rather not
82 Shade 42.4%
66 18
0.5% Rather not
83▼ 6 Charlie 39.5%
38 10
0.3% Rather not
84▼ 5 Brock 43.0%
356 43
2.6% Rather not
85▼ 2 Darryl 41.7%
103 25
0.7% Rather not
86 Stu 42.3%
149 30
1.1% Rather not
87▲ 4 Emz 41.8%
285 40
2.1% Rather not
88▼ 1 Ziggy 26.3%
19 0
0.1% Rather not
89▲ 1 Sandy 35.6%
45 12
0.3% Rather not
90▼ 2 Grom 34.9%
43 11
0.3% Rather not
91▲ 1 Lola 35.8%
53 15
0.4% Rather not
92▼ 3 Bo 40.4%
193 34
1.4% Rather not
93 Dynamike 40.1%
172 32
1.2% Rather not
94 Nita 40.0%
255 38
1.9% Rather not
95▲ 1 Pam 32.3%
62 17
0.5% Rather not
96▼ 1 Chuck 20.0%
30 6
0.2% Rather not
97 Gale 29.0%
62 17
0.5% Rather not
98 Hank 22.0%
41 11
0.3% Rather not
99 Amber 27.6%
76 20
0.6% Rather not
100 Rosa 31.0%
113 26
0.8% Rather not
101 Gus 28.1%
96 23
0.7% Rather not
102▲ 1 Poco 30.5%
174 32
1.3% Rather not
103▼ 1 El Primo 31.8%
255 38
1.9% Rather not
104▲ 1 Barley 27.2%
158 31
1.1% Rather not
105▼ 1 Jacky 22.6%
106 25
0.8% Rather not
106 Jessie 20.0%
115 26
0.8% Rather not