
Bounty
189,703 battles collected on this map — ranked only.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 42 of 105 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 7,416 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 763 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 7,416 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 763 real line-ups from a different rank tier, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (886 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here. The numbers also come from the solo queue: the battles behind them were fought by three strangers, not a practised team.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Bolt |
68.8% | 14875 | 99 | 1.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Piper |
56.3% | 48446 | 100 | 4.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Tick |
55.9% | 31034 | 100 | 3.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Gray |
55.8% | 8009 | 90 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Grom |
55.6% | 9225 | 92 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▲ 1 | Brock |
54.9% | 66687 | 100 | 6.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▼ 1 | Nani |
55.5% | 9898 | 93 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Belle |
55.4% | 8235 | 90 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Mina |
55.7% | 4495 | 81 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Pearl |
55.9% | 3012 | 75 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | R-T |
57.0% | 1276 | 62 | 0.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | – | Carl |
54.5% | 5304 | 83 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | – | Mr. P |
55.2% | 2383 | 72 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | – | Bo |
53.7% | 13973 | 98 | 1.4% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | – | Byron |
53.3% | 29187 | 100 | 3.0% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | – | Mico |
53.7% | 3706 | 78 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | – | Mortis |
52.6% | 25333 | 100 | 2.6% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Leon |
52.8% | 15213 | 99 | 1.6% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | – | Fang |
52.7% | 12902 | 97 | 1.3% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | – | Stu |
52.8% | 9612 | 92 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | – | Max |
52.7% | 10180 | 93 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | – | Gus |
52.5% | 8147 | 90 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | – | Najia |
52.4% | 10469 | 94 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | – | Mandy |
52.2% | 15151 | 99 | 1.5% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | – | Angelo |
53.2% | 2932 | 75 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | – | Pierce |
51.9% | 18885 | 100 | 1.9% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | – | Edgar |
51.0% | 99840 | 100 | 10.2% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | – | Otis |
51.6% | 5396 | 84 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 29 | – | Doug |
52.6% | 1782 | 67 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 30 | – | 8-Bit |
50.7% | 15995 | 100 | 1.6% | Solid | ||
| 31 | – | Meeple |
51.0% | 6410 | 86 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 32 | – | Colt |
50.2% | 29797 | 100 | 3.0% | Solid | ||
| 33 | – | Griff |
50.0% | 21682 | 100 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 34 | – | Glowy |
52.3% | 1078 | 60 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 35 | – | Buster |
57.4% | 216 | 36 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 36 | – | Penny |
50.5% | 5957 | 85 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 37 | – | Jae-Yong |
54.1% | 444 | 46 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 38 | – | Gigi |
51.7% | 1228 | 62 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 39 | – | Starr Nova |
49.8% | 10757 | 94 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 40 | – | Kit |
50.0% | 5504 | 84 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 41 | – | Surge |
49.5% | 11337 | 95 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 42 | – | Spike |
49.0% | 13093 | 97 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 1 | Bea |
49.1% | 7494 | 89 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▲ 1 | Sprout |
49.8% | 2621 | 73 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▲ 1 | Sam |
52.3% | 327 | 42 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 46 | – | Janet |
50.2% | 863 | 56 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 47 | – | Chester |
48.5% | 3800 | 78 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 48 | – | Maisie |
49.3% | 1541 | 65 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 49 | – | Ollie |
54.7% | 161 | 31 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 50 | – | Lily |
48.2% | 5416 | 84 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▼ 1 | Chuck |
50.4% | 617 | 51 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 52 | – | Ruffs |
49.0% | 1128 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | – | Dynamike |
47.0% | 13929 | 98 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | – | Gene |
47.7% | 2772 | 74 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | – | Finx |
49.0% | 776 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | – | Moe |
49.8% | 434 | 46 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | – | Nori |
46.0% | 96921 | 100 | 9.9% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | – | Willow |
46.0% | 28512 | 100 | 2.9% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | – | Crow |
46.1% | 15583 | 100 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | – | Squeak |
46.2% | 8404 | 90 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Alli |
47.8% | 983 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 1 | Darryl |
47.0% | 2092 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Bonnie |
47.5% | 1202 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▲ 1 | Lola |
47.9% | 758 | 54 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 2 | Poco |
46.9% | 2132 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | – | Rico |
45.5% | 20473 | 100 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | – | Gale |
46.7% | 1541 | 65 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | – | Sirius |
45.6% | 4557 | 81 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – | Emz |
44.8% | 20547 | 100 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | – | Eve |
46.6% | 940 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – | Ziggy |
45.9% | 1115 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – | Bibi |
44.9% | 3452 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – | Juju |
46.2% | 452 | 47 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – | Ash |
45.1% | 991 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Charlie |
44.8% | 1360 | 63 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Bull |
44.3% | 2826 | 74 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Colette |
43.6% | 7311 | 88 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Jessie |
43.9% | 3664 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – | Rosa |
44.3% | 1148 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | – | Damian |
44.3% | 939 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – | Hank |
44.5% | 636 | 52 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 1 | Trunk |
42.9% | 11236 | 95 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | Cordelius |
43.2% | 2178 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | Amber |
43.2% | 1483 | 64 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – | Buzz |
42.9% | 2577 | 73 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
42.7% | 1892 | 68 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Lumi |
42.6% | 1538 | 65 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Kenji |
41.9% | 4268 | 80 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | – | Draco |
42.4% | 302 | 41 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | Kaze |
40.9% | 35335 | 100 | 3.6% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 1 | Meg |
41.7% | 2547 | 73 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | El Primo |
41.3% | 2322 | 71 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – | Clancy |
41.2% | 667 | 52 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – | Pam |
40.8% | 686 | 53 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Shade |
40.1% | 3345 | 77 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Melodie |
40.4% | 930 | 57 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Lou |
40.3% | 1371 | 63 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Tara |
39.2% | 1973 | 69 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Sandy |
38.8% | 722 | 54 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Barley |
38.0% | 1506 | 65 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Frank |
37.8% | 4233 | 80 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Nita |
37.0% | 2852 | 74 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Shelly |
36.4% | 4433 | 81 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Berry |
36.0% | 1086 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Jacky |
34.3% | 629 | 52 | 0.1% | Rather not |