
Bounty
190,776 battles collected on this map — ranked only.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 43 of 105 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 7,416 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 782 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 7,416 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 782 real line-ups from a different rank tier, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (918 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here. The numbers also come from the solo queue: the battles behind them were fought by three strangers, not a practised team.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Bolt |
68.8% | 14949 | 99 | 1.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Piper |
56.3% | 48701 | 100 | 4.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Tick |
55.9% | 31275 | 100 | 3.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Gray |
55.8% | 8048 | 90 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Grom |
55.6% | 9297 | 92 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Brock |
54.9% | 67049 | 100 | 6.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Nani |
55.4% | 9955 | 93 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Belle |
55.4% | 8286 | 90 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Mina |
55.7% | 4523 | 81 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Pearl |
55.9% | 3027 | 75 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | R-T |
57.0% | 1285 | 62 | 0.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 1 | Carl |
54.6% | 5340 | 84 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▼ 1 | Mr. P |
55.1% | 2410 | 72 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | – | Bo |
53.7% | 14078 | 98 | 1.4% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | – | Byron |
53.3% | 29331 | 100 | 3.0% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | – | Mico |
53.7% | 3728 | 78 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | – | Mortis |
52.6% | 25456 | 100 | 2.6% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Leon |
52.8% | 15296 | 99 | 1.6% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | – | Fang |
52.7% | 12971 | 97 | 1.3% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | – | Stu |
52.8% | 9659 | 92 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | – | Max |
52.7% | 10223 | 93 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | – | Najia |
52.5% | 10535 | 94 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 1 | Gus |
52.6% | 8181 | 90 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▼ 1 | Mandy |
52.2% | 15240 | 99 | 1.5% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | – | Pierce |
51.9% | 18982 | 100 | 1.9% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | – | Angelo |
53.1% | 2946 | 75 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | – | Edgar |
51.0% | 100410 | 100 | 10.2% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | – | Otis |
51.6% | 5418 | 84 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 29 | – | Doug |
52.5% | 1796 | 67 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 30 | – | 8-Bit |
50.7% | 16083 | 100 | 1.6% | Solid | ||
| 31 | – | Colt |
50.2% | 29953 | 100 | 3.0% | Solid | ||
| 32 | – | Meeple |
50.9% | 6442 | 86 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▲ 1 | Buster |
57.8% | 218 | 36 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 34 | – | Griff |
50.0% | 21807 | 100 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 35 | – | Glowy |
52.3% | 1084 | 60 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▼ 1 | Penny |
50.5% | 5994 | 85 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 37 | – | Jae-Yong |
53.9% | 447 | 46 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 38 | – | Gigi |
51.7% | 1234 | 62 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▼ 1 | Starr Nova |
49.7% | 10812 | 94 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▲ 1 | Kit |
50.0% | 5528 | 84 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 41 | – | Surge |
49.6% | 11397 | 95 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 42 | – | Spike |
49.0% | 13169 | 97 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▲ 1 | Sprout |
49.9% | 2635 | 73 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▼ 1 | Bea |
49.1% | 7536 | 89 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▲ 1 | Sam |
52.6% | 329 | 42 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 1 | Chester |
48.5% | 3827 | 79 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 47 | – | Maisie |
49.3% | 1548 | 65 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 48 | – | Lily |
48.2% | 5444 | 84 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 49 | – | Ollie |
54.7% | 161 | 31 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 50 | – | Janet |
49.9% | 869 | 56 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 51 | – | Chuck |
50.5% | 618 | 51 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 52 | – | Dynamike |
47.1% | 14011 | 98 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | – | Ruffs |
48.9% | 1136 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | – | Gene |
47.6% | 2787 | 74 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | – | Finx |
48.9% | 781 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▲ 1 | Nori |
45.9% | 97549 | 100 | 9.9% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▼ 3 | Moe |
49.4% | 439 | 46 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▲ 1 | Willow |
46.1% | 28638 | 100 | 2.9% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 1 | Alli |
48.0% | 988 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | – | Crow |
46.1% | 15688 | 100 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Squeak |
46.2% | 8461 | 90 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 1 | Poco |
47.0% | 2143 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▲ 1 | Bonnie |
47.6% | 1205 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | Darryl |
47.0% | 2100 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 2 | Lola |
48.0% | 765 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | – | Rico |
45.5% | 20579 | 100 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | – | Gale |
46.7% | 1549 | 65 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | – | Sirius |
45.6% | 4593 | 81 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – | Emz |
44.8% | 20704 | 100 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 1 | Eve |
46.6% | 943 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 1 | Ziggy |
46.0% | 1121 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 1 | Bibi |
44.9% | 3482 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 1 | Juju |
46.2% | 457 | 47 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – | Ash |
45.2% | 995 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Charlie |
44.8% | 1365 | 63 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 1 | Bull |
44.2% | 2845 | 74 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Colette |
43.6% | 7342 | 88 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 1 | Jessie |
43.8% | 3689 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 1 | Rosa |
44.4% | 1155 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 1 | Damian |
44.3% | 944 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – | Hank |
44.4% | 637 | 52 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Trunk |
42.9% | 11295 | 95 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | Cordelius |
43.3% | 2194 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | Amber |
43.2% | 1496 | 65 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – | Buzz |
42.9% | 2595 | 73 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
42.8% | 1908 | 68 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Lumi |
42.6% | 1546 | 65 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Kenji |
42.0% | 4303 | 80 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | – | Kaze |
40.9% | 35491 | 100 | 3.6% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | Draco |
42.1% | 304 | 41 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Meg |
41.7% | 2561 | 73 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 1 | El Primo |
41.3% | 2337 | 71 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 1 | Clancy |
41.3% | 673 | 53 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – | Pam |
40.9% | 690 | 53 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Shade |
40.2% | 3369 | 77 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Melodie |
40.4% | 933 | 57 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Lou |
40.2% | 1379 | 63 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Tara |
39.5% | 1990 | 69 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Sandy |
38.8% | 729 | 54 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▲ 1 | Frank |
38.0% | 4274 | 80 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 1 | Barley |
37.9% | 1518 | 65 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Nita |
37.1% | 2876 | 74 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Shelly |
36.4% | 4457 | 81 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Berry |
36.2% | 1091 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Jacky |
34.3% | 636 | 52 | 0.1% | Rather not |