
Heist
41,462 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 43 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 4,369 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 848 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 4,369 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 848 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (54 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Nori |
69.0% | 19635 | 100 | 5.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Wendy |
75.0% | 776 | 55 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | ▲ 1 | Kaze |
62.7% | 6927 | 87 | 1.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▲ 1 | Mico |
62.0% | 6884 | 87 | 1.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▲ 4 | Lumi |
63.9% | 1543 | 65 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Starr Nova |
63.7% | 1692 | 66 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▼ 4 | Gigi |
64.4% | 1073 | 60 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▲ 2 | Bolt |
61.8% | 1745 | 67 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▲ 2 | Pierce |
61.6% | 1346 | 63 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▼ 2 | Chuck |
58.7% | 9964 | 93 | 2.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▲ 7 | Sirius |
60.2% | 1182 | 61 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 8 | Shade |
59.6% | 1270 | 62 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▼ 6 | 8-Bit |
56.3% | 14341 | 98 | 5.3% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▼ 1 | R-T |
60.9% | 640 | 52 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 1 | Lola |
57.4% | 820 | 56 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 3 | Doug |
58.6% | 514 | 49 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 11 | Draco |
58.4% | 490 | 48 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▼ 3 | Nita |
53.2% | 8629 | 91 | 3.9% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▼ 7 | Griff |
53.4% | 6027 | 85 | 2.0% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▲ 9 | Juju |
57.1% | 525 | 49 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 21 | ▲ 9 | Bo |
54.2% | 1857 | 68 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 22 | ▲ 31 | Trunk |
57.5% | 459 | 47 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 23 | ▲ 16 | Chester |
55.9% | 656 | 52 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 24 | ▼ 2 | Amber |
53.8% | 1568 | 65 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 25 | – | Stu |
56.0% | 527 | 49 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 26 | ▲ 10 | Sam |
58.0% | 305 | 41 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▼ 5 | Ruffs |
57.1% | 366 | 43 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▼ 13 | Melodie |
52.0% | 4933 | 82 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▲ 8 | Glowy |
54.9% | 525 | 49 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▲ 13 | Gray |
56.5% | 313 | 41 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▲ 1 | Moe |
55.0% | 416 | 45 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▲ 1 | Mandy |
51.4% | 2656 | 73 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▲ 17 | Sprout |
53.4% | 552 | 50 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▲ 13 | Nani |
52.1% | 951 | 58 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▼ 1 | Angelo |
51.6% | 1008 | 59 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▼ 19 | Jessie |
49.3% | 11962 | 96 | 4.6% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▼ 10 | Carl |
49.9% | 3083 | 75 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▲ 3 | Edgar |
48.8% | 10540 | 94 | 4.2% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▲ 6 | Mina |
53.4% | 320 | 41 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 9 | Penny |
48.8% | 5202 | 83 | 2.4% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 11 | Finx |
53.9% | 245 | 37 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 16 | Najia |
51.3% | 452 | 47 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▲ 21 | Hank |
52.1% | 317 | 41 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▲ 7 | Ziggy |
52.0% | 306 | 41 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▲ 4 | Damian |
52.3% | 262 | 38 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 22 | Bull |
47.8% | 4409 | 81 | 1.8% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 9 | Janet |
52.4% | 189 | 34 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 1 | Colt |
46.8% | 11881 | 96 | 4.7% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 28 | Eve |
48.2% | 1365 | 63 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▲ 12 | Meeple |
50.5% | 283 | 40 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▼ 10 | Colette |
46.8% | 5760 | 85 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▲ 7 | Alli |
48.3% | 569 | 50 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▲ 1 | Emz |
45.9% | 4371 | 81 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 16 | Meg |
45.8% | 4413 | 81 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 20 | Berry |
45.8% | 3632 | 78 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▼ 1 | Darryl |
45.9% | 1919 | 68 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▼ 14 | Brock |
45.0% | 8195 | 90 | 3.1% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▲ 2 | Willow |
47.7% | 321 | 42 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 3 | Bibi |
45.1% | 2682 | 73 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▲ 7 | Gus |
46.2% | 372 | 44 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 7 | Kit |
45.6% | 562 | 50 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 13 | Jae-Yong |
45.6% | 206 | 35 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 19 | Cordelius |
43.9% | 1521 | 65 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 9 | Buzz |
43.7% | 1492 | 65 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 7 | Pearl |
43.8% | 912 | 57 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 8 | Mortis |
43.2% | 720 | 54 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 6 | Kenji |
42.5% | 1389 | 63 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 10 | Lily |
42.2% | 1049 | 59 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▲ 7 | Barley |
40.4% | 2638 | 73 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 4 | Fang |
40.4% | 1162 | 61 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 1 | Otis |
40.3% | 1386 | 63 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 5 | Ash |
39.8% | 783 | 55 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 15 | Frank |
39.4% | 2234 | 71 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 3 | Pam |
39.4% | 741 | 54 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 14 | Rico |
38.9% | 4732 | 82 | 2.6% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▲ 4 | Crow |
38.8% | 4271 | 80 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 7 | Squeak |
38.9% | 1565 | 65 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 19 | Larry & Lawrie |
38.8% | 1113 | 60 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 31 | Clancy |
38.6% | 1180 | 61 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 5 | Dynamike |
38.3% | 3628 | 78 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 2 | Spike |
38.4% | 2312 | 71 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 13 | Gale |
38.2% | 762 | 54 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 18 | Surge |
38.1% | 1567 | 65 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | El Primo |
37.9% | 2134 | 70 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 6 | Piper |
36.6% | 2346 | 71 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 4 | Tara |
36.4% | 1016 | 59 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 7 | Max |
36.4% | 1263 | 62 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 1 | Byron |
36.3% | 1630 | 66 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 13 | Jacky |
35.8% | 674 | 53 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 4 | Belle |
35.3% | 988 | 58 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 12 | Charlie |
34.7% | 749 | 54 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 19 | Lou |
34.1% | 917 | 57 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 11 | Rosa |
33.6% | 937 | 58 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 6 | Shelly |
33.7% | 1950 | 69 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 3 | Poco |
33.4% | 1191 | 61 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Bonnie |
32.6% | 863 | 56 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 16 | Maisie |
32.4% | 766 | 55 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 16 | Ollie |
28.2% | 238 | 37 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 4 | Bea |
31.7% | 871 | 56 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 1 | Leon |
31.1% | 1172 | 61 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 8 | Grom |
30.4% | 909 | 57 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 10 | Mr. P |
30.0% | 801 | 55 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▲ 3 | Tick |
29.1% | 1785 | 67 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 9 | Buster |
24.5% | 392 | 45 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▼ 4 | Sandy |
24.7% | 632 | 52 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | ▼ 1 | Gene |
20.7% | 458 | 47 | 0.3% | Rather not |