Heist

Hot Tubs

20,779 battles collected on this map.

TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 32 of 103 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 7918 games

Damage Dealer 6334 games

Damage Dealer 776 games

Controller 3142 games

Damage Dealer 462 games

Damage Dealer 4311 games

Controller 6508 games

Damage Dealer 735 games

Damage Dealer 1455 games

Damage Dealer 259 games

Damage Dealer 342 games

Damage Dealer 3199 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Heist): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Wendy 92.7%Winrate 41 games

Lola 55.8%Winrate 462 games

Overrated

Colt 45.1%Winrate 5,891 games

Edgar 46.6%Winrate 4,955 games

Brock 46.7%Winrate 4,115 games

Meg 47.4%Winrate 3,283 games

If you queue as three

three-brawler line-ups that actually exist — counted across the whole mode.

This is for Heist as a whole, not for this map. There are not enough numbers here yet for a map-specific calculation — the calibration needs line-ups actually played on this map. As soon as enough accumulate, the calculation for Hot Tubs appears in this spot; until then the mode-wide list is the best available answer.

Out of 111 line-ups with 120+ games.

Bull

Emz

Nori

77.9% 269 games

Bull

Nita

Nori

76.9% 131 games

Emz

Jessie

Nori

76.4% 166 games

Griff

Mico

Nori

75.6% 132 games

Melodie

Nita

Nori

75.0% 125 games

8-Bit

Mico

Nori

74.7% 206 games

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. three-brawler line-ups that actually exist, counted across the whole mode — not for this map. There is no basis for a map-specific calculation yet: the calibration needs line-ups played on this map. The measured number is therefore not a prediction for Hot Tubs, but the answer to what generally wins in Heist.

Measured · in the mode. The strongest three-brawler line-ups in this mode, out of 111 with at least 120 games. The number is deliberately cautious: unchecked, the luckiest outlier would sit on top. Per mode, not per map — on a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a number of its own.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Nori	69.4%	8803	91	7.1%	Strong pick
2	▲ 1	Mico	61.9%	3983	79	3.2%	Strong pick
3	▼ 1	Kaze	61.7%	4134	80	3.3%	Strong pick
4	–	Gigi	64.6%	681	53	0.5%	Strong pick
5	–	Starr Nova	63.3%	885	57	0.7%	Strong pick
6	–	8-Bit	58.0%	7918	89	6.4%	Strong pick
7	–	Chuck	57.3%	6334	86	5.1%	Strong pick
8	–	Bolt	60.1%	930	57	0.7%	Strong pick
9	–	Pierce	60.4%	738	54	0.6%	Strong pick
10	–	Lumi	59.0%	776	55	0.6%	Good pick
11	–	Griff	54.8%	3142	76	2.5%	Good pick
12	NEW	Wendy	92.7%	41	11	0.0%	Good pick
13	▼ 1	Melodie	52.6%	2685	73	2.2%	Good pick
14	▼ 1	Lola	55.8%	462	47	0.4%	Good pick
15	–	Nita	51.6%	4311	80	3.5%	Good pick
16	▼ 2	Jessie	51.2%	6508	87	5.2%	Good pick
17	▼ 1	Doug	58.2%	225	36	0.2%	Good pick
18	▼ 1	Sirius	52.9%	601	51	0.5%	Solid
19	▼ 1	Shade	53.2%	536	49	0.4%	Solid
20	▼ 1	Eve	52.4%	735	54	0.6%	Solid
21	▲ 3	Najia	55.4%	240	37	0.2%	Solid
22	▼ 1	Bull	50.3%	2093	70	1.7%	Solid
23	▼ 4	Stu	55.7%	210	35	0.2%	Solid
24	▲ 2	Carl	50.6%	1455	64	1.2%	Solid
25	▼ 3	Ruffs	55.1%	214	35	0.2%	Solid
26	▼ 3	Amber	51.0%	908	57	0.7%	Solid
27	▲ 1	Juju	53.6%	308	41	0.2%	Solid
28	▼ 2	R-T	54.1%	259	38	0.2%	Solid
29	▼ 2	Draco	53.8%	234	37	0.2%	Solid
30	▼ 1	Berry	48.8%	1870	68	1.5%	Solid
31	▼ 1	Angelo	49.9%	611	51	0.5%	Solid
32	▲ 1	Bo	49.3%	875	57	0.7%	Solid
33	▼ 2	Penny	48.0%	2607	73	2.1%	Solid
34	▼ 2	Mandy	48.3%	1573	65	1.3%	Solid
35	▼ 2	Glowy	50.7%	292	40	0.2%	Solid
36	▲ 1	Chester	50.3%	342	42	0.3%	Solid
37	▼ 1	Meg	47.4%	3283	76	2.6%	Solid
38	▼ 2	Colette	47.1%	3199	76	2.6%	Solid
39	▼ 1	Sam	52.0%	152	30	0.1%	Solid
40	–	Brock	46.7%	4115	80	3.3%	Solid
41	▼ 1	Moe	50.4%	234	37	0.2%	Solid
42	▼ 2	Edgar	46.6%	4955	82	4.0%	Solid
43	▼ 1	Nani	47.6%	557	50	0.4%	Solid
44	▼ 1	Ziggy	49.6%	135	29	0.1%	Solid
45	▲ 7	Mina	48.8%	166	32	0.1%	Solid
46	▼ 1	Colt	45.1%	5891	85	4.7%	Solid
47	▼ 2	Clancy	46.9%	544	49	0.4%	Solid
48	▼ 2	Cordelius	46.6%	599	51	0.5%	Rather not
49	▼ 2	Gray	48.8%	127	28	0.1%	Rather not
50	–	Sprout	47.3%	258	38	0.2%	Rather not
51	▼ 2	Damian	47.8%	134	28	0.1%	Rather not
52	▼ 4	Trunk	47.0%	185	33	0.1%	Rather not
53	▼ 2	Finx	47.0%	117	26	0.1%	Rather not
54	▼ 2	Emz	44.5%	1935	68	1.6%	Rather not
55	▼ 1	Alli	45.5%	347	43	0.3%	Rather not
56	▼ 1	Buzz	45.0%	664	52	0.5%	Rather not
57	▼ 2	Janet	44.7%	103	25	0.1%	Rather not
58	–	Pearl	44.4%	374	44	0.3%	Rather not
59	▼ 1	Darryl	43.2%	833	56	0.7%	Rather not
60	▼ 2	Meeple	42.4%	125	27	0.1%	Rather not
61	–	Kenji	42.9%	697	53	0.6%	Rather not
62	▼ 1	Bibi	42.5%	1403	64	1.1%	Rather not
63	–	Willow	42.3%	175	32	0.1%	Rather not
64	–	Hank	41.2%	131	28	0.1%	Rather not
65	▼ 2	Surge	42.1%	736	54	0.6%	Rather not
66	–	Squeak	41.8%	716	54	0.6%	Rather not
67	▼ 3	Fang	41.7%	482	48	0.4%	Rather not
68	▼ 1	Kit	40.7%	297	40	0.2%	Rather not
69	▼ 1	Lou	40.8%	404	45	0.3%	Rather not
70	▼ 1	Gale	39.7%	287	40	0.2%	Rather not
71	–	Gus	37.7%	151	30	0.1%	Rather not
72	▼ 2	Jae-Yong	35.4%	96	23	0.1%	Rather not
73	▼ 1	Otis	39.7%	605	51	0.5%	Rather not
74	▼ 1	Lily	38.9%	455	47	0.4%	Rather not
75	▼ 1	Mortis	37.8%	304	41	0.2%	Rather not
76	▲ 3	Ash	37.4%	278	39	0.2%	Rather not
77	▲ 2	Pam	37.5%	317	41	0.3%	Rather not
78	▼ 1	Crow	38.5%	2278	71	1.8%	Rather not
79	▼ 1	Barley	38.5%	1219	61	1.0%	Rather not
80	▼ 5	Maisie	37.5%	355	43	0.3%	Rather not
81	▼ 5	Charlie	36.6%	292	40	0.2%	Rather not
82	–	Spike	38.0%	989	58	0.8%	Rather not
83	–	Ollie	27.0%	74	20	0.1%	Rather not
84	▼ 2	Byron	37.4%	896	57	0.7%	Rather not
85	▼ 1	Belle	36.1%	352	43	0.3%	Rather not
86	▼ 1	Dynamike	36.9%	1660	66	1.3%	Rather not
87	▼ 1	El Primo	36.8%	925	57	0.7%	Rather not
88	▼ 1	Mr. P	35.1%	348	43	0.3%	Rather not
89	–	Frank	36.2%	825	56	0.7%	Rather not
90	▲ 1	Tara	34.9%	393	45	0.3%	Rather not
91	▼ 2	Buster	28.3%	120	27	0.1%	Rather not
92	▼ 3	Rico	36.0%	1923	68	1.5%	Rather not
93	▼ 1	Grom	33.8%	396	45	0.3%	Rather not
94	▼ 1	Bonnie	33.0%	379	44	0.3%	Rather not
95	▼ 1	Piper	34.7%	1301	62	1.0%	Rather not
96	–	Poco	33.4%	545	49	0.4%	Rather not
97	▼ 3	Larry & Lawrie	32.7%	440	46	0.4%	Rather not
98	–	Max	33.3%	576	50	0.5%	Rather not
99	▼ 1	Leon	31.8%	462	47	0.4%	Rather not
100	▼ 1	Jacky	28.2%	245	37	0.2%	Rather not
101	▼ 1	Sandy	27.8%	252	38	0.2%	Rather not
102	▼ 1	Bea	28.0%	353	43	0.3%	Rather not
103	▼ 1	Shelly	30.2%	686	53	0.6%	Rather not
104	▼ 1	Rosa	27.5%	363	43	0.3%	Rather not
105	▼ 1	Gene	21.5%	172	32	0.1%	Rather not
106	▼ 1	Tick	27.8%	770	55	0.6%	Rather not