
Knockout
114,351 battles collected on this map.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 59 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 6,581 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 446 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 6,581 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 446 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
81.0% | 10596 | 94 | 1.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | ▲ 1 | Nori |
61.7% | 20712 | 100 | 3.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | ▼ 1 | Bolt |
62.0% | 5987 | 85 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Pierce |
60.5% | 11136 | 95 | 1.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Sirius |
60.5% | 4159 | 80 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Pearl |
59.8% | 4019 | 79 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Starr Nova |
58.4% | 6901 | 87 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 8 | ▲ 1 | Najia |
58.4% | 5796 | 85 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 9 | ▼ 1 | Meeple |
58.1% | 6281 | 86 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 10 | – | Meg |
57.7% | 5704 | 85 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | ▲ 1 | Eve |
58.2% | 3061 | 75 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | ▼ 1 | Mina |
57.4% | 4461 | 81 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 5 | Belle |
56.9% | 7300 | 88 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▲ 3 | Sprout |
56.9% | 4579 | 81 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▼ 2 | Glowy |
57.5% | 2737 | 74 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▼ 2 | R-T |
57.5% | 2675 | 73 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▼ 2 | Gray |
56.3% | 9849 | 93 | 1.4% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▼ 2 | Otis |
56.8% | 4526 | 81 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | – | Charlie |
57.3% | 2712 | 73 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▲ 1 | Angelo |
55.6% | 8791 | 91 | 1.3% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▼ 1 | Finx |
56.5% | 3010 | 75 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | – | Nani |
55.6% | 7788 | 89 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 23 | – | Jae-Yong |
56.1% | 2231 | 71 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 24 | – | Juju |
56.1% | 2074 | 69 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 25 | – | Bonnie |
55.2% | 4319 | 80 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 26 | ▲ 2 | Byron |
54.0% | 16719 | 100 | 2.4% | Solid | ||
| 27 | – | Janet |
55.1% | 3207 | 76 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▼ 2 | Chester |
54.3% | 5789 | 85 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 29 | – | Moe |
55.1% | 2247 | 71 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▲ 1 | Kit |
53.7% | 8929 | 91 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▲ 3 | Lumi |
54.8% | 2390 | 72 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 32 | – | Griff |
53.5% | 6625 | 87 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▲ 2 | Mandy |
53.0% | 15541 | 100 | 2.3% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▼ 4 | Lily |
53.4% | 6438 | 86 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 1 | Fang |
53.1% | 7612 | 89 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▼ 3 | Gigi |
54.1% | 2163 | 70 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▲ 2 | Squeak |
52.7% | 5755 | 85 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 38 | – | Gus |
52.3% | 9162 | 92 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▲ 2 | Maisie |
52.8% | 3913 | 79 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 3 | Mico |
52.6% | 4184 | 80 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▼ 1 | Max |
52.1% | 7732 | 89 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▲ 1 | Bea |
51.9% | 9963 | 93 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▲ 2 | Tick |
52.1% | 6827 | 87 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▲ 4 | Lola |
52.6% | 2802 | 74 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▼ 1 | Grom |
52.3% | 3952 | 79 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 4 | Cordelius |
51.9% | 4061 | 79 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 3 | Buster |
52.9% | 1656 | 66 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 2 | Stu |
51.5% | 7444 | 89 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 2 | Ziggy |
52.7% | 1748 | 67 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▲ 1 | Kenji |
51.4% | 5540 | 84 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▲ 3 | Spike |
50.9% | 9012 | 91 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▲ 3 | Leon |
50.6% | 13651 | 98 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 4 | Gene |
51.0% | 4890 | 82 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 2 | Ruffs |
51.3% | 2933 | 75 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▲ 1 | Clancy |
51.8% | 1408 | 64 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▼ 3 | Carl |
50.3% | 5840 | 85 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | – | Ash |
50.8% | 2096 | 70 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▲ 4 | Surge |
49.8% | 7279 | 88 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | – | Kaze |
50.1% | 4285 | 80 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
50.4% | 2768 | 74 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 3 | Brock |
49.0% | 27844 | 100 | 4.1% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 1 | Mortis |
49.3% | 10342 | 93 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▲ 3 | Piper |
48.8% | 36327 | 100 | 5.3% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 3 | Bo |
49.6% | 4792 | 82 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 7 | Alli |
49.8% | 3363 | 77 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 1 | Mr. P |
49.9% | 2985 | 75 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 3 | Colette |
49.1% | 8291 | 90 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 1 | Amber |
49.6% | 3010 | 75 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▲ 3 | Melodie |
49.3% | 2493 | 72 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 2 | Penny |
48.9% | 4224 | 80 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 2 | Sandy |
49.1% | 2384 | 72 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 1 | Lou |
48.7% | 2734 | 74 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 1 | Buzz |
48.2% | 4161 | 80 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 1 | Draco |
49.0% | 1591 | 65 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 1 | Damian |
48.8% | 1765 | 67 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 1 | Ollie |
49.0% | 1339 | 63 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Doug |
47.9% | 2816 | 74 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 2 | Bibi |
47.3% | 5469 | 84 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 1 | Gale |
47.6% | 2891 | 74 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 1 | Berry |
47.3% | 2259 | 71 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – | Shade |
46.9% | 3830 | 79 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Willow |
46.8% | 2611 | 73 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | Tara |
46.2% | 3820 | 79 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▲ 1 | Sam |
46.1% | 2043 | 69 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – | Hank |
46.0% | 2047 | 69 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 1 | Jessie |
45.5% | 4477 | 81 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Crow |
44.9% | 13917 | 98 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 1 | 8-Bit |
44.5% | 10850 | 94 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 1 | Dynamike |
44.5% | 7265 | 88 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 1 | Darryl |
43.8% | 4678 | 82 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 1 | Trunk |
44.2% | 1745 | 67 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Poco |
43.2% | 6325 | 86 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – | Frank |
43.1% | 4782 | 82 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – | Rico |
41.4% | 16562 | 100 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Pam |
41.4% | 2408 | 72 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Colt |
40.5% | 23186 | 100 | 3.4% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Emz |
40.7% | 9803 | 93 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Bull |
39.7% | 5674 | 84 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 1 | Edgar |
38.5% | 35690 | 100 | 5.2% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▲ 1 | Nita |
37.9% | 6012 | 85 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 2 | Jacky |
38.1% | 2407 | 72 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Chuck |
37.2% | 1325 | 63 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Shelly |
36.0% | 11107 | 95 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Barley |
35.0% | 4121 | 80 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Rosa |
29.5% | 3204 | 76 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | El Primo |
29.4% | 7172 | 88 | 1.0% | Rather not |