Brawl Arena

Knockout Grounds

40,179 battles collected on this map.

TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 35 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 12322 games

Damage Dealer 1962 games

Controller 7457 games

Controller 2211 games

Controller 8803 games

Damage Dealer 3181 games

Controller 2217 games

Damage Dealer 4644 games

Controller 6355 games

Damage Dealer 1846 games

Damage Dealer 2664 games

Damage Dealer 2536 games

Controller 2472 games

Damage Dealer 2613 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Brawl Arena): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Gigi 55.1%Winrate 1,356 games

Overrated

Colt 41.8%Winrate 5,606 games

Nita 47.0%Winrate 4,689 games

Bull 43.0%Winrate 4,085 games

Poco 46.1%Winrate 3,452 games

If you queue as three

three-brawler line-ups that actually exist — counted across the whole mode.

This is for Brawl Arena as a whole, not for this map. There are not enough numbers here yet for a map-specific calculation — the calibration needs line-ups actually played on this map. As soon as enough accumulate, the calculation for Knockout Grounds appears in this spot; until then the mode-wide list is the best available answer.

Out of 59 line-ups with 120+ games.

8-Bit

Shade

Wendy

83.9% 494 games

8-Bit

Brock

Wendy

76.9% 219 games

Brock

Shade

Wendy

75.9% 125 games

8-Bit

Nori

Wendy

75.3% 166 games

8-Bit

Piper

Wendy

72.4% 138 games

8-Bit

Emz

Wendy

71.5% 228 games

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. three-brawler line-ups that actually exist, counted across the whole mode — not for this map. There is no basis for a map-specific calculation yet: the calibration needs line-ups played on this map. The measured number is therefore not a prediction for Knockout Grounds, but the answer to what generally wins in Brawl Arena.

Measured · in the mode. The strongest three-brawler line-ups in this mode, out of 59 with at least 120 games. The number is deliberately cautious: unchecked, the luckiest outlier would sit on top. Per mode, not per map — on a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a number of its own.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Wendy	72.3%	2744	74	1.0%	Strong pick
2	–	Nori	61.7%	9267	92	4.0%	Strong pick
3	–	8-Bit	61.2%	12322	96	5.0%	Strong pick
4	–	Bolt	58.6%	3106	75	1.1%	Strong pick
5	–	Starr Nova	57.6%	3251	76	1.4%	Strong pick
6	–	Brock	54.4%	8127	90	3.1%	Strong pick
7	▲ 6	Chester	55.6%	1962	69	0.9%	Strong pick
8	–	Meg	54.6%	2808	74	1.1%	Strong pick
9	–	Jessie	53.4%	7457	89	2.8%	Strong pick
10	–	Mandy	54.3%	2501	72	0.9%	Strong pick
11	▼ 4	Gigi	55.1%	1356	63	0.6%	Strong pick
12	▲ 9	Amber	54.2%	2211	70	0.9%	Strong pick
13	▼ 1	Emz	53.0%	8803	91	3.6%	Strong pick
14	▲ 2	Surge	53.5%	3181	76	1.3%	Good pick
15	▼ 1	Sirius	53.8%	2182	70	0.9%	Good pick
16	▲ 7	Squeak	53.7%	2217	70	0.9%	Good pick
17	▼ 2	Pierce	53.0%	3401	77	1.5%	Good pick
18	▼ 7	Tick	52.6%	3685	78	1.4%	Good pick
19	▲ 9	Rico	52.2%	4644	81	2.0%	Good pick
20	▼ 3	Griff	51.6%	6355	86	2.6%	Good pick
21	▲ 5	Kenji	52.0%	3122	76	1.2%	Good pick
22	▼ 2	Penny	51.4%	6111	86	2.4%	Good pick
23	▲ 7	Kit	52.6%	1486	64	0.6%	Good pick
24	▼ 5	Mina	53.4%	950	58	0.4%	Good pick
25	▲ 2	Frank	51.6%	3263	76	1.5%	Good pick
26	▼ 1	Lumi	52.1%	1846	68	0.8%	Good pick
27	▲ 2	Spike	51.5%	2664	73	1.1%	Good pick
28	▼ 4	Dynamike	51.1%	4019	79	1.6%	Good pick
29	▼ 7	Byron	50.6%	2970	75	1.1%	Good pick
30	▲ 1	Colette	50.7%	2536	72	1.1%	Solid
31	▼ 13	Piper	50.1%	3541	77	1.4%	Solid
32	▲ 3	Berry	50.0%	2218	70	0.8%	Solid
33	▲ 13	Edgar	48.7%	12804	97	5.7%	Solid
34	▼ 3	Draco	51.4%	683	53	0.3%	Solid
35	▲ 8	Bibi	49.3%	3830	79	1.6%	Solid
36	–	Sprout	50.6%	868	56	0.4%	Solid
37	▲ 8	Bo	49.3%	2472	72	1.0%	Solid
38	▼ 2	Carl	49.0%	2613	73	1.0%	Solid
39	▼ 6	Larry & Lawrie	50.0%	1072	60	0.4%	Solid
40	▼ 2	Damian	49.0%	2093	70	0.8%	Solid
41	▲ 4	Chuck	49.7%	1063	59	0.4%	Solid
42	▲ 7	Leon	49.3%	1420	64	0.6%	Solid
43	▼ 9	Gray	49.7%	1041	59	0.4%	Solid
44	▼ 2	Cordelius	49.5%	987	58	0.4%	Solid
45	▲ 12	Crow	48.5%	2610	73	1.1%	Solid
46	▲ 4	Buzz	48.9%	1572	65	0.6%	Solid
47	▼ 6	Shade	48.8%	1723	67	0.8%	Solid
48	▲ 6	Ash	48.9%	1335	63	0.6%	Solid
49	▼ 10	Lily	49.0%	1154	61	0.5%	Solid
50	▼ 2	Clancy	48.6%	1108	60	0.4%	Solid
51	▲ 11	Kaze	48.7%	943	58	0.4%	Solid
52	▼ 1	Tara	47.8%	1795	67	0.8%	Solid
53	▼ 6	Nita	47.0%	4689	82	2.0%	Solid
54	▲ 5	Glowy	47.8%	1000	59	0.4%	Rather not
55	▼ 2	Doug	47.3%	1619	66	0.8%	Rather not
56	▼ 16	Ziggy	47.8%	716	54	0.3%	Rather not
57	▼ 5	Poco	46.1%	3452	77	1.4%	Rather not
58	▲ 19	Otis	47.0%	619	51	0.3%	Rather not
59	▼ 2	Sandy	46.5%	808	55	0.4%	Rather not
60	▲ 12	Pearl	46.2%	1033	59	0.4%	Rather not
61	▲ 2	R-T	46.5%	617	51	0.3%	Rather not
62	▲ 17	Buster	46.3%	607	51	0.2%	Rather not
63	▼ 5	Ruffs	46.2%	599	51	0.2%	Rather not
64	▲ 22	Trunk	45.4%	1081	60	0.5%	Rather not
65	▲ 8	Jae-Yong	46.1%	453	47	0.2%	Rather not
66	▼ 11	Barley	44.4%	3526	77	1.4%	Rather not
67	▲ 1	Nani	45.0%	1479	64	0.7%	Rather not
68	▲ 7	Melodie	45.5%	585	51	0.3%	Rather not
69	▼ 9	Alli	45.0%	555	50	0.2%	Rather not
70	–	Fang	44.4%	1445	64	0.6%	Rather not
71	▼ 4	Lou	44.6%	859	56	0.3%	Rather not
72	▼ 2	Janet	44.6%	583	50	0.3%	Rather not
73	▼ 13	Gale	44.0%	1149	61	0.5%	Rather not
74	▲ 2	Mortis	43.2%	2909	74	1.3%	Rather not
75	▼ 1	Bull	43.0%	4085	80	1.6%	Rather not
76	▲ 2	Finx	44.0%	411	45	0.2%	Rather not
77	▼ 13	Najia	43.5%	542	49	0.2%	Rather not
78	▲ 10	Max	42.8%	1379	63	0.6%	Rather not
79	▲ 8	Colt	41.8%	5606	84	2.4%	Rather not
80	▼ 9	Juju	42.6%	472	47	0.2%	Rather not
81	▼ 16	Belle	42.2%	1100	60	0.5%	Rather not
82	▼ 1	Lola	41.9%	894	57	0.4%	Rather not
83	▲ 1	Mico	42.0%	555	50	0.2%	Rather not
84	▲ 1	Stu	41.7%	1543	65	0.7%	Rather not
85	▼ 5	Charlie	41.4%	469	47	0.2%	Rather not
86	▼ 20	Grom	41.1%	1320	63	0.6%	Rather not
87	▼ 4	Maisie	40.9%	771	55	0.3%	Rather not
88	▼ 6	Hank	40.3%	890	57	0.4%	Rather not
89	▲ 1	Meeple	40.1%	591	51	0.3%	Rather not
90	▲ 2	Moe	39.0%	495	48	0.2%	Rather not
91	–	Willow	38.9%	797	55	0.3%	Rather not
92	▲ 3	Darryl	38.9%	1410	64	0.6%	Rather not
93	–	Shelly	38.2%	3312	76	1.4%	Rather not
94	▲ 5	El Primo	37.9%	2882	74	1.3%	Rather not
95	▲ 6	Jacky	37.8%	1347	63	0.6%	Rather not
96	▼ 2	Mr. P	37.6%	943	58	0.4%	Rather not
97	▼ 8	Pam	37.6%	1577	65	0.7%	Rather not
98	▼ 1	Ollie	35.8%	299	40	0.1%	Rather not
99	▼ 3	Eve	36.4%	418	45	0.2%	Rather not
100	▲ 2	Bea	37.0%	1375	63	0.6%	Rather not
101	▲ 3	Angelo	35.8%	598	51	0.3%	Rather not
102	▼ 4	Sam	35.8%	634	52	0.3%	Rather not
103	▼ 3	Bonnie	34.6%	685	53	0.3%	Rather not
104	▼ 1	Gus	34.9%	1057	59	0.5%	Rather not
105	–	Rosa	33.9%	1850	68	0.8%	Rather not
106	–	Gene	33.3%	892	57	0.4%	Rather not