
Bounty
202,354 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 44 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 6,291 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 354 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 6,291 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 354 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (67 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Bolt |
68.3% | 9311 | 92 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Wendy |
58.8% | 118314 | 100 | 1.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | ▲ 1 | Shade |
57.4% | 22529 | 100 | 2.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▼ 1 | Tick |
56.0% | 67431 | 100 | 3.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▲ 2 | Mina |
56.6% | 5841 | 85 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▼ 1 | Meeple |
55.8% | 12942 | 97 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▼ 1 | Starr Nova |
55.7% | 15790 | 100 | 1.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▲ 1 | Nori |
55.1% | 50165 | 100 | 4.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▲ 8 | Gigi |
56.1% | 3146 | 76 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 10 | ▲ 5 | Sprout |
55.0% | 8495 | 91 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | ▲ 5 | Gray |
54.7% | 8234 | 90 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | ▼ 4 | Mico |
54.4% | 11113 | 95 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 1 | Doug |
55.0% | 4040 | 79 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▲ 8 | Ruffs |
55.5% | 2367 | 71 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▼ 3 | Juju |
55.3% | 2610 | 73 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▼ 5 | Bo |
53.7% | 13838 | 98 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 18 | R-T |
55.7% | 1374 | 63 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▼ 5 | Mortis |
53.1% | 28474 | 100 | 3.7% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▲ 4 | Kaze |
53.8% | 5844 | 85 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▼ 10 | Brock |
52.9% | 49884 | 100 | 4.1% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 5 | Pierce |
53.4% | 9118 | 92 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▲ 3 | Najia |
52.6% | 7875 | 89 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 4 | Damian |
53.1% | 3868 | 79 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▼ 6 | Penny |
52.2% | 14190 | 98 | 1.3% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▲ 7 | Alli |
52.6% | 6279 | 86 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▼ 5 | Carl |
52.3% | 7751 | 89 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▼ 8 | Edgar |
51.4% | 115890 | 100 | 5.3% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | ▲ 6 | Ziggy |
52.7% | 3300 | 76 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▼ 1 | Willow |
52.5% | 4023 | 79 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▼ 10 | Lily |
51.3% | 22544 | 100 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▲ 7 | Janet |
52.8% | 1705 | 67 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 1 | Mandy |
51.0% | 14305 | 98 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▲ 24 | Jae-Yong |
54.1% | 745 | 54 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▼ 10 | Surge |
50.6% | 27233 | 100 | 1.8% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 7 | Lumi |
52.0% | 2296 | 71 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▲ 4 | Chester |
50.9% | 6515 | 87 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▲ 7 | Stu |
50.7% | 5152 | 83 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▼ 2 | Kit |
50.0% | 12315 | 96 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▼ 9 | Grom |
49.9% | 15677 | 100 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 7 | Griff |
49.7% | 25863 | 100 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 19 | Chuck |
51.5% | 1084 | 60 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 3 | Ash |
50.3% | 2840 | 74 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▲ 7 | Trunk |
50.8% | 1641 | 66 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▲ 9 | Finx |
51.2% | 1110 | 60 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▼ 16 | Mr. P |
49.6% | 4982 | 83 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 1 | Moe |
50.4% | 1498 | 65 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▼ 10 | Dynamike |
48.3% | 33234 | 100 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▲ 11 | Hank |
49.4% | 1982 | 69 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 1 | Sirius |
48.3% | 8872 | 91 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▲ 29 | Sam |
50.1% | 985 | 58 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▼ 9 | Pearl |
48.5% | 4816 | 82 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▼ 9 | Bibi |
47.6% | 12218 | 96 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▼ 6 | Rico |
47.1% | 27985 | 100 | 2.8% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 8 | Emz |
46.9% | 27951 | 100 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▲ 12 | Angelo |
48.0% | 1676 | 66 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▼ 7 | Leon |
46.4% | 17128 | 100 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▲ 9 | Gus |
46.9% | 4476 | 81 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 6 | Spike |
46.0% | 18430 | 100 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 18 | Draco |
47.9% | 739 | 54 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▲ 13 | Glowy |
47.4% | 1030 | 59 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 1 | 8-Bit |
45.6% | 12772 | 97 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▼ 11 | Larry & Lawrie |
45.9% | 4882 | 82 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 8 | Fang |
45.5% | 10455 | 94 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 3 | Kenji |
45.4% | 11270 | 95 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 11 | Squeak |
45.3% | 14976 | 99 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 3 | Nani |
45.7% | 3697 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 9 | Cordelius |
45.1% | 7119 | 88 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 13 | Lola |
45.9% | 1339 | 63 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 6 | Max |
44.3% | 6822 | 87 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 9 | Amber |
44.3% | 2647 | 73 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 1 | Gene |
43.6% | 4577 | 81 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 8 | Otis |
43.1% | 6209 | 86 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 5 | Jessie |
43.0% | 7590 | 89 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 18 | Buster |
43.1% | 1403 | 64 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 4 | Buzz |
42.2% | 6124 | 86 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 6 | Barley |
42.2% | 6330 | 86 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▲ 1 | Byron |
41.9% | 11576 | 95 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 2 | Crow |
41.5% | 18502 | 100 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 4 | Piper |
41.2% | 20210 | 100 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 6 | Belle |
40.9% | 5363 | 84 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 4 | Meg |
40.2% | 5944 | 85 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Rosa |
40.4% | 3159 | 76 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | Bull |
40.0% | 7329 | 88 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▲ 2 | Nita |
40.0% | 5744 | 85 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 5 | Frank |
38.9% | 7627 | 89 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 3 | Colt |
38.3% | 19279 | 100 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 3 | Maisie |
38.8% | 2971 | 75 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Darryl |
38.6% | 4927 | 82 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 2 | Poco |
38.3% | 5283 | 83 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 5 | Tara |
38.2% | 4667 | 82 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 3 | Eve |
38.2% | 1821 | 67 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 5 | Bea |
37.7% | 7266 | 88 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – | Gale |
37.2% | 4342 | 80 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 2 | Sandy |
36.6% | 3151 | 76 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 3 | Bonnie |
35.9% | 2346 | 71 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▲ 4 | Berry |
35.7% | 4786 | 82 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▲ 1 | Shelly |
35.3% | 8597 | 91 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 33 | Ollie |
35.3% | 1214 | 61 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▼ 2 | Lou |
35.2% | 3035 | 75 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 1 | Colette |
34.9% | 7858 | 89 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Jacky |
34.9% | 2678 | 73 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Clancy |
33.9% | 1989 | 69 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▲ 1 | El Primo |
32.7% | 5026 | 83 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 1 | Charlie |
32.1% | 2314 | 71 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Pam |
31.4% | 1749 | 67 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Melodie |
25.7% | 2096 | 70 | 0.4% | Rather not |