
Bounty
168,410 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 33 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 4,616 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 233 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 4,616 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 233 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (95 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Bolt |
67.8% | 6801 | 87 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Wendy |
58.5% | 114267 | 100 | 11.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Tick |
56.8% | 60675 | 100 | 6.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Shade |
56.1% | 17342 | 100 | 1.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Meeple |
55.1% | 10647 | 94 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Starr Nova |
54.3% | 12744 | 97 | 1.3% | Good pick | ||
| 7 | – | Mico |
54.4% | 9908 | 93 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 8 | – | Mina |
55.0% | 3616 | 78 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 9 | – | Brock |
53.5% | 41498 | 100 | 4.1% | Good pick | ||
| 10 | – | Nori |
53.0% | 41124 | 100 | 4.1% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | – | Bo |
52.9% | 12309 | 96 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | – | Mortis |
52.6% | 21030 | 100 | 2.1% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 1 | Juju |
54.2% | 2188 | 70 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▲ 1 | Gray |
52.9% | 5938 | 85 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▼ 2 | Doug |
53.4% | 2995 | 75 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | – | Edgar |
51.7% | 105032 | 100 | 10.4% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 3 | Penny |
52.2% | 11609 | 95 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▼ 1 | Carl |
52.4% | 5883 | 85 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▼ 1 | Gigi |
53.2% | 2283 | 71 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▼ 1 | Lily |
51.7% | 19495 | 100 | 1.9% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | – | Sprout |
52.1% | 6545 | 87 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▲ 2 | Ruffs |
52.7% | 1586 | 65 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 23 | – | Surge |
50.6% | 23614 | 100 | 2.3% | Solid | ||
| 24 | ▼ 2 | Mr. P |
51.5% | 3817 | 79 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 25 | ▲ 1 | Grom |
50.7% | 13803 | 98 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 26 | ▼ 1 | Damian |
51.6% | 3152 | 76 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 27 | – | Najia |
51.0% | 6695 | 87 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▲ 4 | Willow |
51.0% | 3401 | 77 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▲ 1 | Pierce |
50.4% | 7079 | 88 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▼ 1 | Griff |
49.8% | 22837 | 100 | 2.3% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▼ 3 | Alli |
50.5% | 4726 | 82 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 1 | Kaze |
50.6% | 3857 | 79 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 33 | – | Mandy |
49.9% | 11817 | 95 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 34 | – | Ziggy |
50.6% | 2591 | 73 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 1 | Kit |
49.2% | 10197 | 93 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▼ 1 | R-T |
51.4% | 921 | 57 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 37 | – | Dynamike |
48.5% | 29408 | 100 | 2.9% | Solid | ||
| 38 | – | Ash |
49.7% | 1668 | 66 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▲ 2 | Chester |
48.7% | 5457 | 84 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 2 | Pearl |
49.0% | 3279 | 76 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 1 | Janet |
49.7% | 1212 | 61 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 1 | Bibi |
47.9% | 10411 | 94 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 43 | – | Lumi |
48.6% | 1693 | 66 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▲ 1 | Emz |
46.8% | 24664 | 100 | 2.4% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▼ 1 | Stu |
47.5% | 3891 | 79 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 46 | ▲ 1 | Rico |
46.6% | 22335 | 100 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 47 | ▲ 1 | Leon |
46.6% | 14272 | 98 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | ▼ 2 | Larry & Lawrie |
47.2% | 3546 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | ▲ 2 | Sirius |
46.7% | 7854 | 89 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▼ 2 | Moe |
48.0% | 1150 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | – | Ollie |
49.0% | 524 | 49 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▲ 3 | Spike |
46.2% | 16139 | 100 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▲ 2 | Trunk |
47.8% | 1156 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 4 | Buster |
48.2% | 819 | 56 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 1 | Squeak |
45.9% | 12493 | 96 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | – | Fang |
45.9% | 8379 | 90 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | – | Cordelius |
45.9% | 5782 | 85 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | – | Kenji |
45.2% | 8599 | 91 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 1 | Finx |
46.6% | 816 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 2 | Jae-Yong |
46.9% | 461 | 47 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 1 | 8-Bit |
44.6% | 9633 | 92 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 1 | Hank |
45.6% | 1382 | 63 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Otis |
44.8% | 4869 | 82 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 1 | Chuck |
46.0% | 652 | 52 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | – | Max |
44.5% | 4594 | 81 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | – | Gus |
44.0% | 3226 | 76 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | – | Jessie |
43.1% | 6284 | 86 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 1 | Nani |
43.0% | 2918 | 75 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 1 | Barley |
42.7% | 4740 | 82 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 2 | Buzz |
42.3% | 4637 | 81 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 4 | Angelo |
43.0% | 1184 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 1 | Belle |
42.4% | 3717 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 3 | Piper |
41.8% | 15302 | 99 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – | Crow |
41.5% | 15763 | 100 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 1 | Gene |
42.0% | 3073 | 75 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▲ 1 | Byron |
41.5% | 8744 | 91 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 4 | Glowy |
42.6% | 707 | 53 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 2 | Draco |
41.4% | 522 | 49 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 1 | Amber |
40.7% | 2139 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 1 | Bull |
40.1% | 5929 | 85 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – | Rosa |
40.3% | 2123 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Sam |
40.2% | 594 | 51 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 1 | Lola |
39.9% | 1005 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | Maisie |
39.8% | 2166 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 1 | Bonnie |
39.5% | 1409 | 64 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 1 | Bea |
38.9% | 5412 | 84 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 1 | Nita |
38.9% | 4410 | 81 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 2 | Poco |
38.8% | 3792 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 1 | Colt |
38.2% | 15469 | 99 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 1 | Darryl |
38.6% | 3719 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 1 | Gale |
38.5% | 3153 | 76 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 1 | Meg |
38.3% | 4167 | 80 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – | Frank |
38.0% | 6078 | 86 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – | Eve |
38.3% | 1260 | 62 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Tara |
37.0% | 3562 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Sandy |
36.0% | 2265 | 71 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▲ 2 | Shelly |
34.9% | 6731 | 87 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 1 | Lou |
34.9% | 2228 | 71 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 1 | Colette |
34.8% | 6237 | 86 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 2 | Berry |
34.7% | 3904 | 79 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 1 | Jacky |
34.2% | 1931 | 68 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 1 | Clancy |
33.7% | 1530 | 65 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Charlie |
32.0% | 1694 | 66 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▲ 1 | El Primo |
30.7% | 3661 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▼ 1 | Melodie |
29.8% | 1230 | 62 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Pam |
29.3% | 965 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not |