
Bounty
168,056 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 33 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 4,409 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 210 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 4,409 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 210 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (71 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Bolt |
67.8% | 6788 | 87 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Wendy |
58.5% | 114016 | 100 | 11.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Tick |
56.8% | 60587 | 100 | 6.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Shade |
56.1% | 17300 | 100 | 1.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Meeple |
55.1% | 10624 | 94 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Starr Nova |
54.3% | 12718 | 97 | 1.3% | Good pick | ||
| 7 | – | Mico |
54.4% | 9895 | 93 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 8 | – | Mina |
54.9% | 3611 | 78 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 9 | – | Brock |
53.5% | 41419 | 100 | 4.1% | Good pick | ||
| 10 | – | Nori |
53.0% | 41056 | 100 | 4.1% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | – | Bo |
52.9% | 12274 | 96 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | – | Mortis |
52.6% | 20981 | 100 | 2.1% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 1 | Juju |
54.1% | 2183 | 70 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▲ 1 | Gray |
52.9% | 5927 | 85 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 1 | Edgar |
51.7% | 104782 | 100 | 10.4% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▼ 3 | Doug |
53.3% | 2978 | 75 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 3 | Penny |
52.2% | 11593 | 95 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▼ 1 | Carl |
52.4% | 5864 | 85 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▼ 1 | Lily |
51.7% | 19462 | 100 | 1.9% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▼ 1 | Gigi |
53.2% | 2281 | 71 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | – | Sprout |
52.1% | 6540 | 87 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▲ 4 | Ruffs |
52.7% | 1585 | 65 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 23 | – | Surge |
50.7% | 23574 | 100 | 2.3% | Solid | ||
| 24 | ▼ 2 | Mr. P |
51.5% | 3810 | 79 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 25 | – | Grom |
50.7% | 13781 | 98 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 26 | ▼ 2 | Damian |
51.7% | 3147 | 76 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 27 | – | Najia |
51.0% | 6675 | 87 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▲ 4 | Willow |
50.9% | 3399 | 77 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▲ 1 | Pierce |
50.4% | 7059 | 88 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▼ 1 | Griff |
49.8% | 22788 | 100 | 2.3% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▼ 3 | Alli |
50.5% | 4716 | 82 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 1 | Kaze |
50.6% | 3851 | 79 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 33 | – | Mandy |
49.8% | 11793 | 95 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 34 | – | Ziggy |
50.6% | 2585 | 73 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 35 | – | Kit |
49.2% | 10176 | 93 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 36 | – | R-T |
51.4% | 920 | 57 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 37 | – | Dynamike |
48.6% | 29351 | 100 | 2.9% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▲ 1 | Ash |
49.8% | 1661 | 66 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▲ 1 | Chester |
48.7% | 5451 | 84 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 2 | Pearl |
49.0% | 3271 | 76 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 1 | Janet |
49.7% | 1209 | 61 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 1 | Bibi |
47.9% | 10395 | 94 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 43 | – | Lumi |
48.6% | 1691 | 66 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▲ 1 | Emz |
46.8% | 24611 | 100 | 2.4% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▼ 1 | Stu |
47.5% | 3884 | 79 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 46 | ▲ 1 | Rico |
46.6% | 22285 | 100 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 47 | ▲ 2 | Leon |
46.6% | 14250 | 98 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | ▼ 2 | Larry & Lawrie |
47.2% | 3541 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | ▲ 2 | Sirius |
46.7% | 7839 | 89 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▼ 2 | Moe |
48.0% | 1147 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▼ 1 | Ollie |
49.0% | 524 | 49 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▲ 3 | Trunk |
48.0% | 1153 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▲ 2 | Spike |
46.2% | 16107 | 100 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 4 | Buster |
48.2% | 818 | 56 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 1 | Squeak |
45.8% | 12466 | 96 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | – | Fang |
45.9% | 8364 | 90 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | – | Cordelius |
45.9% | 5769 | 85 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | – | Kenji |
45.3% | 8578 | 91 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 1 | Finx |
46.7% | 814 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 1 | Jae-Yong |
46.8% | 459 | 47 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | 8-Bit |
44.6% | 9609 | 92 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | – | Otis |
44.8% | 4862 | 82 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▲ 1 | Hank |
45.5% | 1379 | 63 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 1 | Chuck |
46.0% | 652 | 52 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | – | Max |
44.5% | 4575 | 81 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | – | Gus |
43.9% | 3212 | 76 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | – | Jessie |
43.1% | 6267 | 86 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 1 | Nani |
43.0% | 2910 | 75 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 1 | Barley |
42.7% | 4735 | 82 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 1 | Buzz |
42.4% | 4626 | 81 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 5 | Angelo |
43.0% | 1184 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – | Belle |
42.4% | 3712 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 3 | Piper |
41.8% | 15275 | 99 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – | Crow |
41.4% | 15732 | 100 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Gene |
42.1% | 3070 | 75 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 3 | Glowy |
42.6% | 706 | 53 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Byron |
41.5% | 8728 | 91 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 2 | Draco |
41.4% | 522 | 49 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 1 | Amber |
40.7% | 2136 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 1 | Bull |
40.1% | 5913 | 85 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – | Rosa |
40.3% | 2120 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 1 | Sam |
40.0% | 592 | 51 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 2 | Lola |
39.9% | 1005 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 2 | Maisie |
39.7% | 2160 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 1 | Bonnie |
39.5% | 1404 | 64 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 2 | Nita |
38.9% | 4393 | 81 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Bea |
38.9% | 5407 | 84 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 2 | Poco |
38.8% | 3786 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 1 | Colt |
38.2% | 15432 | 99 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 1 | Darryl |
38.6% | 3714 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Meg |
38.4% | 4144 | 80 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Gale |
38.4% | 3143 | 76 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 1 | Eve |
38.3% | 1258 | 62 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 1 | Frank |
38.0% | 6059 | 85 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Tara |
37.0% | 3544 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Sandy |
36.0% | 2261 | 71 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▲ 2 | Shelly |
34.9% | 6704 | 87 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 1 | Lou |
35.0% | 2222 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 1 | Colette |
34.8% | 6216 | 86 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 2 | Berry |
34.8% | 3893 | 79 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 1 | Jacky |
34.1% | 1926 | 68 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 1 | Clancy |
33.8% | 1527 | 65 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Charlie |
32.0% | 1688 | 66 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▲ 1 | El Primo |
30.6% | 3646 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▼ 1 | Melodie |
29.7% | 1228 | 62 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Pam |
29.3% | 963 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not |