Gem Grab

Let Me Dance

20,132 battles collected on this map.

MEDIUM — an average amount of choice: 49 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 624 games

Trust

Strong pick

63.1%Win rate

Controller 2624 games

Damage Dealer 483 games

Damage Dealer 513 games

Damage Dealer 884 games

Damage Dealer 340 games

Controller 2873 games

Damage Dealer 189 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Gem Grab): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Damian 65.4%Winrate 736 games

Meeple 63.9%Winrate 588 games

Ruffs 64.7%Winrate 485 games

Lumi 63.1%Winrate 624 games

Overrated

Edgar 44.5%Winrate 5,002 games

Emz 45.0%Winrate 3,672 games

Tick 45.2%Winrate 2,783 games

Rico 46.0%Winrate 2,634 games

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 2,871 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 204 real line-ups.

66.1% expected

66.1% expected

66.0% expected

66.0% expected

66.0% expected

66.0% expected

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 2,871 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 204 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (49 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Wendy	74.8%	1906	68	1.6%	Strong pick
2	–	Bolt	69.5%	3430	77	2.8%	Strong pick
3	–	Nori	68.1%	3766	78	3.1%	Strong pick
4	–	Starr Nova	67.0%	1918	68	1.6%	Strong pick
5	–	Damian	65.4%	736	54	0.6%	Strong pick
6	–	Mina	62.7%	943	58	0.8%	Strong pick
7	–	Meeple	63.9%	588	51	0.5%	Strong pick
8	–	Ruffs	64.7%	485	48	0.4%	Strong pick
9	–	Lumi	63.1%	624	51	0.5%	Strong pick
10	–	Bo	59.0%	2624	73	2.2%	Strong pick
11	–	Gigi	64.1%	426	46	0.4%	Strong pick
12	–	Pierce	60.4%	903	57	0.7%	Strong pick
13	–	Doug	62.0%	540	49	0.4%	Strong pick
14	–	Glowy	62.3%	496	48	0.4%	Strong pick
15	–	Sirius	60.0%	863	56	0.7%	Strong pick
16	–	Jae-Yong	66.3%	264	39	0.2%	Strong pick
17	–	Kaze	60.2%	664	52	0.5%	Good pick
18	–	Finx	63.2%	323	42	0.3%	Good pick
19	–	Chuck	60.7%	483	48	0.4%	Good pick
20	–	Moe	60.2%	513	49	0.4%	Good pick
21	–	Janet	61.4%	383	44	0.3%	Good pick
22	–	Chester	57.9%	884	57	0.7%	Good pick
23	–	Amber	59.6%	530	49	0.4%	Good pick
24	–	Trunk	61.3%	359	43	0.3%	Good pick
25	–	Gray	58.9%	550	50	0.5%	Good pick
26	–	Juju	65.1%	186	33	0.2%	Good pick
27	–	Mortis	54.2%	3138	76	2.6%	Good pick
28	–	Alli	57.8%	490	48	0.4%	Good pick
29	–	Stu	55.6%	942	58	0.8%	Good pick
30	–	Najia	58.2%	380	44	0.3%	Good pick
31	–	Sam	59.7%	248	38	0.2%	Solid
32	–	Shade	55.4%	606	51	0.5%	Solid
33	–	Lola	57.4%	340	42	0.3%	Solid
34	–	Mico	57.2%	341	42	0.3%	Solid
35	–	Griff	52.1%	2873	74	2.4%	Solid
36	–	Draco	57.5%	285	40	0.2%	Solid
37	–	Kit	53.7%	815	55	0.7%	Solid
38	–	R-T	59.3%	189	34	0.2%	Solid
39	–	Ash	53.1%	765	55	0.6%	Solid
40	–	Sprout	53.9%	532	49	0.4%	Solid
41	–	Gus	53.9%	432	46	0.4%	Solid
42	–	Hank	56.6%	205	35	0.2%	Solid
43	–	Nani	53.9%	343	43	0.3%	Solid
44	–	Surge	50.0%	2788	74	2.3%	Solid
45	–	Ziggy	55.4%	222	36	0.2%	Solid
46	–	Charlie	51.9%	632	52	0.5%	Solid
47	–	8-Bit	49.6%	2856	74	2.4%	Solid
48	–	Willow	54.1%	207	35	0.2%	Solid
49	–	Sandy	49.9%	1115	60	0.9%	Solid
50	–	Jessie	49.0%	1918	68	1.6%	Solid
51	–	Mandy	50.7%	538	49	0.4%	Solid
52	–	Kenji	49.0%	1773	67	1.5%	Solid
53	–	Meg	49.0%	1499	65	1.2%	Solid
54	–	Pearl	49.2%	1070	60	0.9%	Solid
55	–	Angelo	52.8%	176	33	0.1%	Rather not
56	–	Colette	48.3%	1416	64	1.2%	Rather not
57	–	Clancy	48.4%	1001	59	0.8%	Rather not
58	–	Poco	47.0%	2550	73	2.1%	Rather not
59	–	Carl	47.8%	1049	59	0.9%	Rather not
60	–	Otis	47.9%	785	55	0.6%	Rather not
61	▲ 1	Penny	47.0%	1434	64	1.2%	Rather not
62	▼ 1	Tara	47.0%	1497	65	1.2%	Rather not
63	–	Fang	46.7%	1675	66	1.4%	Rather not
64	–	Crow	46.2%	2624	73	2.2%	Rather not
65	–	Lou	47.1%	854	56	0.7%	Rather not
66	–	Spike	46.4%	1656	66	1.4%	Rather not
67	–	Rico	46.0%	2634	73	2.2%	Rather not
68	–	Max	46.5%	1285	62	1.1%	Rather not
69	–	Lily	46.3%	1135	60	0.9%	Rather not
70	–	Tick	45.2%	2783	74	2.3%	Rather not
71	–	Emz	45.0%	3672	78	3.0%	Rather not
72	–	Edgar	44.5%	5002	83	4.1%	Rather not
73	–	Darryl	44.9%	867	56	0.7%	Rather not
74	–	Brock	44.0%	2557	73	2.1%	Rather not
75	–	Piper	44.4%	1165	61	1.0%	Rather not
76	–	Leon	43.9%	1423	64	1.2%	Rather not
77	–	Cordelius	44.3%	818	56	0.7%	Rather not
78	–	Squeak	43.9%	1372	63	1.1%	Rather not
79	–	Bibi	43.3%	1592	65	1.3%	Rather not
80	–	Rosa	43.3%	986	58	0.8%	Rather not
81	–	Nita	42.8%	1512	65	1.3%	Rather not
82	–	Pam	42.9%	993	58	0.8%	Rather not
83	–	Gale	42.9%	783	55	0.6%	Rather not
84	–	Colt	42.1%	2250	71	1.9%	Rather not
85	–	Bull	42.4%	1223	62	1.0%	Rather not
86	–	Byron	42.2%	1470	64	1.2%	Rather not
87	–	Belle	42.3%	607	51	0.5%	Rather not
88	–	Barley	42.2%	839	56	0.7%	Rather not
89	–	Buzz	42.2%	837	56	0.7%	Rather not
90	–	Bea	42.1%	850	56	0.7%	Rather not
91	–	Berry	41.5%	725	54	0.6%	Rather not
92	–	Ollie	40.8%	355	43	0.3%	Rather not
93	–	Dynamike	40.8%	1784	67	1.5%	Rather not
94	–	Eve	40.0%	558	50	0.5%	Rather not
95	–	Frank	39.8%	1241	62	1.0%	Rather not
96	–	Jacky	39.4%	510	48	0.4%	Rather not
97	–	Gene	38.2%	756	54	0.6%	Rather not
98	–	Larry & Lawrie	37.5%	570	50	0.5%	Rather not
99	–	Buster	37.5%	526	49	0.4%	Rather not
100	–	Mr. P	37.2%	656	52	0.5%	Rather not
101	–	Bonnie	36.3%	433	46	0.4%	Rather not
102	–	Melodie	36.3%	573	50	0.5%	Rather not
103	–	Grom	35.2%	593	51	0.5%	Rather not
104	–	Maisie	34.7%	574	50	0.5%	Rather not
105	–	Shelly	35.0%	1599	66	1.3%	Rather not
106	–	El Primo	34.4%	1038	59	0.9%	Rather not