Gem Grab

Let Me Dance

20,481 battles collected on this map.

TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 49 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 629 games

Trust

Strong pick

63.0%Win rate

Controller 2652 games

Damage Dealer 490 games

Damage Dealer 516 games

Damage Dealer 898 games

Damage Dealer 342 games

Controller 2919 games

Damage Dealer 192 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Gem Grab): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Damian 65.3%Winrate 741 games

Meeple 63.8%Winrate 589 games

Ruffs 64.4%Winrate 492 games

Lumi 63.0%Winrate 629 games

Overrated

Edgar 44.7%Winrate 5,131 games

Poco 47.0%Winrate 2,595 games

Emz 45.0%Winrate 3,754 games

Rico 46.0%Winrate 2,682 games

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 9,217 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 928 real line-ups.

65.9% expected

65.9% expected

65.8% expected

65.7% expected

65.7% expected

65.7% expected

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 9,217 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 928 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (148 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Wendy	75.0%	1940	68	1.6%	Strong pick
2	–	Bolt	69.6%	3480	77	2.4%	Strong pick
3	–	Nori	68.2%	3817	79	2.4%	Strong pick
4	–	Starr Nova	67.0%	1946	68	1.5%	Strong pick
5	–	Damian	65.3%	741	54	0.3%	Strong pick
6	–	Mina	62.8%	955	58	0.6%	Strong pick
7	–	Meeple	63.8%	589	51	0.1%	Strong pick
8	–	Ruffs	64.4%	492	48	0.2%	Strong pick
9	▼ 1	Lumi	63.0%	629	52	0.1%	Strong pick
10	▲ 1	Bo	59.2%	2652	73	0.9%	Strong pick
11	–	Gigi	64.3%	428	46	0.1%	Good pick
12	–	Pierce	60.4%	911	57	0.4%	Good pick
13	–	Jae-Yong	66.7%	273	39	0.2%	Good pick
14	–	Glowy	62.3%	506	48	0.2%	Good pick
15	–	Doug	61.8%	545	49	0.2%	Good pick
16	–	Sirius	60.0%	873	56	0.4%	Good pick
17	–	Kaze	60.5%	668	52	0.2%	Good pick
18	–	Finx	63.6%	327	42	0.1%	Good pick
19	–	Janet	61.7%	392	45	0.4%	Good pick
20	–	Chuck	60.6%	490	48	0.4%	Good pick
21	–	Moe	60.3%	516	49	0.2%	Good pick
22	–	Trunk	61.6%	365	43	0.3%	Good pick
23	–	Chester	58.0%	898	57	0.5%	Good pick
24	–	Amber	59.4%	535	49	0.3%	Good pick
25	–	Gray	59.0%	558	50	0.3%	Good pick
26	–	Juju	65.3%	190	34	0.1%	Good pick
27	–	Mortis	54.4%	3183	76	1.7%	Good pick
28	–	Stu	55.9%	956	58	0.4%	Solid
29	–	Alli	57.7%	497	48	0.1%	Solid
30	–	Najia	58.1%	384	44	0.3%	Solid
31	–	Sam	59.8%	251	38	0.2%	Solid
32	–	Shade	55.6%	617	51	0.4%	Solid
33	–	Lola	57.3%	342	42	0.1%	Solid
34	–	Mico	57.2%	346	43	0.3%	Solid
35	–	Kit	54.1%	828	56	0.5%	Solid
36	–	Griff	52.2%	2919	75	2.1%	Solid
37	–	R-T	59.9%	192	34	0.1%	Solid
38	–	Draco	57.4%	289	40	0.1%	Solid
39	▼ 1	Hank	57.8%	225	36	1.2%	Solid
40	▲ 1	Sprout	54.2%	537	49	0.3%	Solid
41	–	Ash	52.6%	780	55	0.7%	Solid
42	–	Gus	53.8%	442	46	0.3%	Solid
43	–	Nani	54.3%	346	43	0.1%	Solid
44	–	Surge	50.0%	2843	74	2.6%	Solid
45	–	Ziggy	54.7%	225	36	0.1%	Solid
46	–	8-Bit	49.5%	2905	74	2.1%	Solid
47	–	Charlie	51.5%	639	52	0.4%	Solid
48	–	Sandy	50.0%	1135	60	0.8%	Solid
49	–	Jessie	49.2%	1949	69	1.1%	Solid
50	–	Willow	53.8%	210	35	0.1%	Solid
51	–	Mandy	50.8%	543	49	0.2%	Solid
52	–	Kenji	49.0%	1794	67	1.0%	Solid
53	–	Meg	49.1%	1518	65	1.0%	Solid
54	–	Pearl	49.0%	1093	60	1.2%	Rather not
55	–	Angelo	52.8%	176	33	11.3%	Rather not
56	–	Colette	48.2%	1429	64	0.5%	Rather not
57	–	Clancy	48.2%	1016	59	0.4%	Rather not
58	–	Poco	47.0%	2595	73	2.3%	Rather not
59	–	Carl	47.7%	1066	59	0.8%	Rather not
60	–	Otis	47.7%	801	55	0.7%	Rather not
61	–	Fang	46.8%	1695	66	0.9%	Rather not
62	–	Tara	46.9%	1520	65	1.2%	Rather not
63	–	Max	46.8%	1319	63	1.3%	Rather not
64	–	Penny	46.7%	1461	64	0.8%	Rather not
65	–	Spike	46.5%	1688	66	1.4%	Rather not
66	–	Crow	46.0%	2669	73	1.8%	Rather not
67	–	Rico	46.0%	2682	73	2.1%	Rather not
68	–	Lou	46.8%	871	56	0.8%	Rather not
69	–	Lily	46.2%	1156	61	1.2%	Rather not
70	▲ 1	Emz	45.0%	3754	78	2.2%	Rather not
71	▼ 1	Tick	45.2%	2829	74	1.8%	Rather not
72	–	Edgar	44.7%	5131	83	5.1%	Rather not
73	–	Darryl	44.9%	881	57	0.6%	Rather not
74	–	Brock	44.1%	2580	73	0.8%	Rather not
75	–	Piper	44.4%	1183	61	0.6%	Rather not
76	–	Leon	44.2%	1460	64	1.9%	Rather not
77	–	Squeak	43.8%	1394	63	1.0%	Rather not
78	–	Cordelius	44.1%	834	56	0.9%	Rather not
79	–	Bibi	43.2%	1626	66	1.3%	Rather not
80	–	Rosa	43.3%	994	58	0.4%	Rather not
81	–	Nita	42.9%	1550	65	1.6%	Rather not
82	▲ 1	Gale	42.9%	799	55	0.8%	Rather not
83	▼ 1	Barley	42.9%	865	56	1.0%	Rather not
84	–	Colt	42.2%	2297	71	2.0%	Rather not
85	–	Pam	42.5%	1012	59	0.6%	Rather not
86	–	Bull	42.4%	1243	62	1.1%	Rather not
87	–	Byron	42.2%	1488	64	0.6%	Rather not
88	–	Belle	42.3%	615	51	0.2%	Rather not
89	–	Bea	41.9%	878	57	1.3%	Rather not
90	–	Buzz	41.7%	859	56	1.1%	Rather not
91	–	Berry	41.2%	742	54	0.7%	Rather not
92	–	Dynamike	40.8%	1813	67	1.2%	Rather not
93	–	Ollie	40.6%	357	43	0.1%	Rather not
94	–	Jacky	39.8%	520	49	0.4%	Rather not
95	–	Frank	39.9%	1280	62	1.9%	Rather not
96	–	Eve	39.4%	571	50	0.7%	Rather not
97	–	Gene	37.9%	770	55	0.5%	Rather not
98	–	Buster	37.5%	536	49	0.4%	Rather not
99	–	Larry & Lawrie	37.2%	588	51	0.6%	Rather not
100	–	Mr. P	37.0%	668	52	0.4%	Rather not
101	–	Bonnie	36.0%	450	47	0.6%	Rather not
102	–	Melodie	36.0%	584	50	0.4%	Rather not
103	–	Grom	35.1%	601	51	0.3%	Rather not
104	–	Maisie	34.7%	582	50	0.5%	Rather not
105	–	Shelly	35.0%	1639	66	1.7%	Rather not
106	–	El Primo	34.6%	1065	59	1.2%	Rather not