Gem Grab

Local Restaurants

33,824 battles collected on this map.

MEDIUM — an average amount of choice: 49 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 1338 games

Trust

Strong pick

62.7%Win rate

Controller 2990 games

Damage Dealer 679 games

Damage Dealer 603 games

Damage Dealer 561 games

Damage Dealer 350 games

Damage Dealer 403 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Gem Grab): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Damian 66.2%Winrate 1,125 games

Shade 65.3%Winrate 1,455 games

Meeple 65.9%Winrate 1,012 games

Doug 65.1%Winrate 931 games

Overrated

Edgar 45.1%Winrate 8,405 games

Emz 45.2%Winrate 5,679 games

Rico 47.5%Winrate 5,905 games

Tick 43.8%Winrate 4,969 games

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 9,055 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 898 real line-ups.

67.8% expected

67.8% expected

67.8% expected

67.8% expected

67.8% expected

67.8% expected

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 9,055 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 898 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (506 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Wendy	77.3%	4423	81	2.0%	Strong pick
2	–	Bolt	70.9%	5505	84	2.8%	Strong pick
3	–	Nori	69.6%	7079	88	3.3%	Strong pick
4	–	Starr Nova	68.5%	2895	74	1.5%	Strong pick
5	–	Damian	66.2%	1125	60	0.4%	Strong pick
6	–	Shade	65.3%	1455	64	0.7%	Strong pick
7	–	Meeple	65.9%	1012	59	0.5%	Strong pick
8	–	Sirius	64.3%	1278	62	0.8%	Strong pick
9	–	Doug	65.1%	931	57	0.3%	Strong pick
10	–	Gigi	66.0%	642	52	0.2%	Strong pick
11	–	Pierce	63.7%	1099	60	0.6%	Strong pick
12	–	Jae-Yong	68.3%	413	45	0.1%	Strong pick
13	–	Chester	62.7%	1338	63	0.5%	Strong pick
14	–	Bo	61.0%	2990	75	1.4%	Strong pick
15	–	Kaze	62.7%	1162	61	0.6%	Strong pick
16	–	Mina	62.7%	1106	60	0.4%	Strong pick
17	–	Stu	61.7%	1559	65	0.8%	Strong pick
18	–	Trunk	64.0%	694	53	0.4%	Strong pick
19	–	Chuck	64.1%	679	53	0.2%	Strong pick
20	–	Lumi	64.2%	603	51	0.3%	Strong pick
21	▲ 1	Draco	64.6%	534	49	0.2%	Strong pick
22	▼ 1	Ziggy	64.2%	575	50	0.3%	Strong pick
23	▲ 1	Finx	67.0%	352	43	0.1%	Strong pick
24	▼ 1	Najia	63.9%	585	51	0.3%	Strong pick
25	–	Moe	63.3%	561	50	0.2%	Strong pick
26	–	Amber	62.0%	724	54	0.3%	Strong pick
27	–	Juju	65.4%	367	44	0.1%	Strong pick
28	▲ 1	Ruffs	61.6%	714	53	0.3%	Good pick
29	▲ 1	Sprout	60.6%	949	58	0.5%	Good pick
30	▼ 2	Kit	59.8%	1271	62	0.6%	Good pick
31	–	Alli	61.8%	638	52	0.3%	Good pick
32	–	Glowy	62.1%	567	50	0.4%	Good pick
33	–	Gus	60.9%	769	55	0.3%	Good pick
34	–	Gray	60.4%	859	56	0.4%	Good pick
35	–	R-T	64.6%	350	43	0.1%	Good pick
36	–	Hank	60.8%	625	51	0.3%	Good pick
37	–	Mortis	56.6%	4963	82	2.0%	Good pick
38	▼ 1	Mandy	59.2%	726	54	0.3%	Good pick
39	▲ 1	Ash	56.7%	2317	71	1.1%	Good pick
40	–	Janet	60.0%	578	50	0.3%	Good pick
41	–	Lola	61.0%	403	45	0.2%	Good pick
42	–	Sam	60.2%	437	46	0.3%	Good pick
43	–	Willow	59.4%	451	47	0.2%	Good pick
44	–	Mico	57.3%	609	51	0.4%	Solid
45	–	Angelo	59.6%	277	39	0.2%	Solid
46	–	Nani	56.1%	378	44	0.1%	Solid
47	▲ 1	Surge	50.7%	4505	81	1.8%	Solid
48	▼ 1	Meg	50.6%	5083	83	1.6%	Solid
49	–	Kenji	50.8%	3507	77	1.5%	Solid
50	–	Griff	49.9%	4772	82	2.1%	Solid
51	–	Jessie	49.3%	2573	73	1.2%	Solid
52	–	Rico	47.5%	5905	85	2.8%	Rather not
53	–	Carl	48.4%	1611	66	0.9%	Rather not
54	–	8-Bit	47.5%	4123	80	2.2%	Rather not
55	–	Tara	47.9%	2290	71	1.2%	Rather not
56	–	Penny	47.0%	2324	71	1.2%	Rather not
57	–	Max	46.9%	2071	69	1.2%	Rather not
58	–	Crow	46.3%	3575	78	1.7%	Rather not
59	–	Lily	46.7%	1965	69	1.0%	Rather not
60	–	Sandy	46.2%	1819	67	0.9%	Rather not
61	–	Edgar	45.1%	8405	90	4.3%	Rather not
62	–	Emz	45.2%	5679	85	2.8%	Rather not
63	–	Clancy	46.0%	1379	63	0.7%	Rather not
64	–	Fang	45.3%	2298	71	1.5%	Rather not
65	▲ 1	Tick	43.8%	4969	83	2.3%	Rather not
66	▼ 1	Frank	44.2%	2344	71	1.3%	Rather not
67	–	Berry	44.3%	1374	63	0.5%	Rather not
68	–	Spike	43.9%	2452	72	1.0%	Rather not
69	–	Nita	43.7%	3587	78	1.9%	Rather not
70	–	Dynamike	43.1%	3966	79	2.2%	Rather not
71	–	Bibi	43.1%	3364	77	1.7%	Rather not
72	–	Pam	43.2%	1452	64	0.8%	Rather not
73	–	Brock	42.3%	4039	79	2.2%	Rather not
74	–	Charlie	42.8%	1016	59	0.5%	Rather not
75	–	Larry & Lawrie	42.6%	1304	62	0.8%	Rather not
76	▲ 1	Pearl	42.2%	1858	68	0.8%	Rather not
77	▼ 1	Bull	42.0%	2456	72	1.2%	Rather not
78	–	Lou	42.2%	1167	61	0.5%	Rather not
79	–	Buzz	41.8%	1712	67	0.9%	Rather not
80	–	Shelly	41.6%	2990	75	1.7%	Rather not
81	–	Byron	41.8%	1827	68	0.9%	Rather not
82	–	Barley	41.5%	1911	68	1.1%	Rather not
83	–	Otis	41.3%	1202	61	1.0%	Rather not
84	–	Piper	41.3%	1478	64	0.9%	Rather not
85	–	Mr. P	41.2%	1136	60	0.6%	Rather not
86	–	Poco	40.8%	2436	72	1.3%	Rather not
87	–	Leon	40.8%	2304	71	1.4%	Rather not
88	–	Darryl	40.0%	1577	65	0.8%	Rather not
89	–	Colt	39.7%	3431	77	1.9%	Rather not
90	–	Squeak	39.6%	2188	70	1.1%	Rather not
91	–	Gene	39.6%	1031	59	0.5%	Rather not
92	–	El Primo	39.2%	2209	70	1.1%	Rather not
93	–	Jacky	39.1%	1161	61	0.6%	Rather not
94	–	Cordelius	38.9%	1693	66	0.8%	Rather not
95	–	Colette	38.7%	1917	68	1.0%	Rather not
96	–	Rosa	38.6%	1478	64	0.8%	Rather not
97	–	Gale	38.1%	1453	64	0.8%	Rather not
98	–	Ollie	37.3%	648	52	0.3%	Rather not
99	–	Bea	37.2%	1437	64	0.7%	Rather not
100	–	Maisie	36.2%	1145	61	0.6%	Rather not
101	–	Grom	35.6%	1036	59	0.5%	Rather not
102	–	Belle	33.8%	989	58	0.4%	Rather not
103	–	Melodie	32.0%	1029	59	0.6%	Rather not
104	–	Buster	30.6%	895	57	0.5%	Rather not
105	–	Eve	29.9%	1009	59	0.5%	Rather not
106	–	Bonnie	26.2%	823	56	0.5%	Rather not