
Knockout
15,424 battles collected on this map.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 64 of 104 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 9,593 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 726 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 9,593 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 726 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Nori |
66.8% | 3245 | 76 | 3.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Starr Nova |
66.4% | 1084 | 60 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Bolt |
65.8% | 1180 | 61 | 1.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Mina |
64.4% | 1014 | 59 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Meg |
61.6% | 2966 | 75 | 3.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Pearl |
65.7% | 597 | 51 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Najia |
64.5% | 715 | 54 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Pierce |
61.2% | 1887 | 68 | 2.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▲ 1 | Meeple |
61.9% | 695 | 53 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 10 | ▼ 1 | Gigi |
64.8% | 386 | 44 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | – | Wendy |
87.5% | 80 | 21 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | – | Gray |
59.0% | 1394 | 63 | 1.5% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | – | Ruffs |
63.0% | 387 | 44 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | – | Gene |
58.9% | 806 | 55 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | – | Sirius |
61.4% | 415 | 45 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 16 | ▲ 1 | Damian |
63.6% | 253 | 38 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 17 | ▼ 1 | Glowy |
61.5% | 327 | 42 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 18 | – | Sprout |
57.1% | 781 | 55 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 19 | ▲ 1 | Otis |
59.0% | 432 | 46 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 20 | ▼ 1 | Kaze |
57.3% | 663 | 52 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 21 | – | Max |
55.4% | 1172 | 61 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 22 | – | Mandy |
54.2% | 2335 | 71 | 2.5% | Solid | ||
| 23 | – | Belle |
55.0% | 1015 | 59 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 24 | – | Mr. P |
58.9% | 321 | 42 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 25 | – | Jae-Yong |
61.9% | 202 | 35 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 26 | – | Nani |
54.5% | 968 | 58 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 27 | – | R-T |
59.8% | 246 | 38 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▲ 2 | Moe |
59.4% | 256 | 38 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▼ 1 | Lou |
58.3% | 309 | 41 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▼ 1 | Kenji |
54.3% | 985 | 58 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▲ 1 | Finx |
58.0% | 300 | 41 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 1 | Ziggy |
58.6% | 268 | 39 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 33 | – | Chester |
55.4% | 558 | 50 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▲ 1 | Bonnie |
56.5% | 402 | 45 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 35 | – | Lily |
54.6% | 699 | 53 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▼ 1 | Angelo |
55.2% | 565 | 50 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 37 | – | Surge |
53.2% | 1047 | 59 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 38 | – | Griff |
53.6% | 780 | 55 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 39 | – | Byron |
51.6% | 2602 | 73 | 2.8% | Solid | ||
| 40 | – | Stu |
53.0% | 845 | 56 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 41 | – | Buzz |
54.9% | 410 | 45 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 42 | – | Alli |
56.8% | 243 | 37 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 43 | – | Kit |
51.9% | 1142 | 61 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 44 | – | Mortis |
51.1% | 1968 | 69 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 45 | – | Lumi |
55.3% | 300 | 41 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 46 | – | Brock |
50.1% | 4956 | 82 | 5.4% | Rather not | ||
| 47 | ▲ 2 | Janet |
54.5% | 341 | 42 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | ▼ 1 | Bea |
51.2% | 1467 | 64 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | ▼ 1 | Cordelius |
55.0% | 302 | 41 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | – | Carl |
52.0% | 721 | 54 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | – | Fang |
51.0% | 1086 | 60 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | – | Gus |
51.0% | 993 | 58 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | – | Ollie |
58.5% | 130 | 28 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | – | Juju |
57.6% | 139 | 29 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | – | Grom |
52.6% | 392 | 45 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | – | Piper |
48.5% | 7284 | 88 | 7.9% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | – | Tick |
50.3% | 933 | 57 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | – | Amber |
52.3% | 354 | 43 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | – | Charlie |
52.9% | 257 | 38 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | – | Mico |
51.2% | 387 | 44 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Doug |
52.6% | 232 | 37 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | – | Sandy |
53.7% | 177 | 33 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Eve |
52.4% | 229 | 36 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | Squeak |
49.3% | 677 | 53 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | – | 8-Bit |
48.2% | 1547 | 65 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 1 | Lola |
51.1% | 233 | 37 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | – | Bo |
48.8% | 631 | 52 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 1 | Berry |
51.2% | 213 | 35 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
50.2% | 217 | 36 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | – | Spike |
47.2% | 1136 | 60 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – | Penny |
48.3% | 433 | 46 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – | Maisie |
48.0% | 371 | 44 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – | Clancy |
51.7% | 89 | 22 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – | Shade |
48.5% | 262 | 38 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Melodie |
49.0% | 192 | 34 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Ash |
49.6% | 133 | 28 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Buster |
48.7% | 158 | 31 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Gale |
47.2% | 269 | 39 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – | Tara |
46.2% | 331 | 42 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | – | Draco |
46.3% | 123 | 27 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – | Leon |
43.6% | 1649 | 66 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 1 | Hank |
44.1% | 145 | 30 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 1 | Bibi |
43.8% | 534 | 49 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | Trunk |
43.8% | 144 | 30 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – | Sam |
43.5% | 115 | 26 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – | Darryl |
43.3% | 466 | 47 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Willow |
43.4% | 196 | 34 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 1 | Pam |
43.1% | 225 | 36 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 1 | Bull |
43.1% | 441 | 46 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 1 | Chuck |
41.7% | 103 | 25 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 1 | Dynamike |
42.4% | 912 | 57 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Frank |
42.0% | 667 | 52 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – | Colette |
41.2% | 868 | 56 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – | Colt |
39.0% | 3725 | 78 | 4.0% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Crow |
38.6% | 1776 | 67 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Edgar |
37.4% | 5623 | 84 | 6.1% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Poco |
36.7% | 649 | 52 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Rosa |
34.1% | 255 | 38 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Jessie |
34.2% | 500 | 48 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Rico |
35.2% | 2195 | 70 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Emz |
33.4% | 1229 | 62 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▲ 1 | Jacky |
28.3% | 230 | 37 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 1 | Barley |
30.6% | 366 | 43 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Shelly |
29.7% | 1398 | 64 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Nita |
26.8% | 736 | 54 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | El Primo |
26.3% | 757 | 54 | 0.8% | Rather not |