My roster

Enter your player tag and the site hides everything you cannot play anyway: brawlers you are missing, and those below power 9 — below 11 from Mythic upwards. The tag goes to the official API once and then stays in your browser. It is neither stored nor logged here, and there is no account.

You can find your tag in the game, under your name in your profile.

← Overview

Brawl Ball

No Good Deed

55,163 battles collected on this map.

TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 40 of 105 brawlers above 50%.

Trophy Road No Good DeedBrawl Ball

Recommendation

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean
Strong pick Good pick SolidHow the brawler stands on this map compared to the whole mode (Brawl Ball): Strong pick is the top tenth of all map/brawler rows, Good pick the top quarter, Solid the upper half, Rather not the rest. What is measured is the cautiously computed win rate (Wilson lower bound), the same number the cards are sorted by — not the percentage shown beside it. The thresholds come from the field rather than from fixed percentages: the modes sit at different levels, and in Showdown the number counts trophy gains rather than wins. Not to be confused with the tier list — that ranks a brawler by how many maps of the rotation he is usable on, across all maps together. A Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “played badly”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.
TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.
Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 9,697 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 1,266 real line-ups.

1
69.2% expected
2
69.1% expected
3
69.1% expected
4
69.1% expected
5
69.1% expected
6
69.1% expected
How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 9,697 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 1,266 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (741 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#BrawlerWin rateGamesTrustPick rateRating
1 Bibi 63.2%
14357 98
4.3% Strong pick
2 Emz 61.1%
5701 85
1.7% Strong pick
3 Frank 60.0%
9775 93
3.0% Strong pick
4 Edgar 59.5%
10626 94
3.2% Good pick
5 Griff 59.2%
6510 87
2.0% Good pick
6 Spike 57.8%
4438 81
1.3% Good pick
7 Clancy 57.1%
2645 73
0.8% Good pick
8▲ 1 Damian 56.5%
4346 81
1.3% Solid
9▼ 1 Sirius 56.4%
2831 74
0.9% Solid
10 Kenji 55.6%
4816 82
1.5% Solid
11 Gale 55.6%
4092 80
1.2% Solid
12 Surge 54.0%
6826 87
2.1% Solid
13 Tara 54.2%
3541 77
1.1% Solid
14▲ 3 Hank 54.2%
2611 73
0.8% Solid
15▼ 1 Ash 53.9%
2898 74
0.9% Solid
16▼ 1 Melodie 53.8%
2652 73
0.8% Solid
17▼ 1 Max 53.3%
4048 79
1.2% Solid
18 Bull 52.3%
11445 95
3.5% Solid
19 Jacky 52.6%
4837 82
1.5% Solid
20 Dynamike 52.4%
5736 85
1.7% Solid
21 Buzz 51.9%
4993 83
1.5% Solid
22 Fang 51.9%
4650 82
1.4% Solid
23 Nita 51.6%
6699 87
2.0% Solid
24▲ 1 Sam 52.1%
2489 72
0.8% Solid
25▼ 1 Darryl 51.2%
6258 86
1.9% Solid
26 Draco 52.1%
1841 68
0.6% Rather not
27 Cordelius 51.3%
3633 78
1.1% Rather not
28▲ 5 Doug 51.2%
3485 77
1.1% Rather not
29▲ 2 Shade 51.0%
3866 79
1.2% Rather not
30▲ 2 El Primo 50.4%
9373 92
2.8% Rather not
31▼ 2 Ollie 52.2%
1318 63
0.4% Rather not
32▼ 4 Trunk 51.3%
2676 73
0.8% Rather not
33▲ 2 Crow 50.9%
3240 76
1.0% Rather not
34▲ 2 Rico 50.1%
7312 88
2.2% Rather not
35▼ 5 Starr Nova 50.6%
2960 75
0.9% Rather not
36▼ 2 Pearl 50.8%
2185 70
0.7% Rather not
37▲ 6 Nori 50.8%
1825 68
0.6% Rather not
38▼ 1 Jae-Yong 51.5%
1002 59
0.3% Rather not
39▼ 1 Maisie 50.2%
2757 74
0.8% Rather not
40▼ 1 Chester 49.7%
4495 81
1.4% Rather not
41 Colette 49.7%
4187 80
1.3% Rather not
42▲ 1 Wendy 76.3%
38 10
0.0% Rather not
43▼ 2 Larry & Lawrie 50.1%
1940 68
0.6% Rather not
44▼ 2 Mortis 48.7%
7987 90
2.4% Rather not
45 Shelly 48.1%
9589 92
2.9% Rather not
46 Lumi 49.4%
1727 67
0.5% Rather not
47 Lou 49.3%
1813 67
0.5% Rather not
48▲ 2 Carl 48.5%
3386 77
1.0% Rather not
49▲ 3 Bo 48.7%
2292 71
0.7% Rather not
50▼ 1 Buster 48.9%
1715 67
0.5% Rather not
51▼ 3 Moe 49.0%
1449 64
0.4% Rather not
52▲ 3 Mina 48.3%
2363 71
0.7% Rather not
53▼ 2 Otis 48.1%
2176 70
0.7% Rather not
54 Tick 47.9%
2249 71
0.7% Rather not
55▲ 2 Kit 47.6%
2574 73
0.8% Rather not
56 Squeak 47.5%
1951 69
0.6% Rather not
57▲ 5 Gigi 47.8%
1331 63
0.4% Rather not
58▲ 2 Willow 47.2%
2338 71
0.7% Rather not
59 R-T 47.5%
1178 61
0.4% Rather not
60▲ 1 Stu 46.3%
4902 82
1.5% Rather not
61▼ 8 Charlie 47.3%
1219 61
0.4% Rather not
62▲ 1 Berry 47.0%
1622 66
0.5% Rather not
63▼ 5 Leon 46.5%
2616 73
0.8% Rather not
64▲ 2 Jessie 46.2%
2533 72
0.8% Rather not
65▲ 4 Meg 45.9%
2766 74
0.8% Rather not
66▲ 1 Pierce 46.3%
1076 60
0.3% Rather not
67▼ 2 Bolt 45.8%
1801 67
0.5% Rather not
68▲ 3 Juju 46.4%
886 57
0.3% Rather not
69▲ 3 Amber 45.7%
1796 67
0.5% Rather not
70▼ 6 Sprout 45.4%
1336 63
0.4% Rather not
71▼ 3 Sandy 45.1%
1769 67
0.5% Rather not
72▼ 2 Ziggy 44.8%
801 55
0.2% Rather not
73▲ 6 Finx 43.6%
1084 60
0.3% Rather not
74▲ 2 Ruffs 43.5%
1443 64
0.4% Rather not
75▼ 2 Lily 43.2%
1792 67
0.5% Rather not
76▲ 1 Kaze 43.0%
2096 70
0.6% Rather not
77▼ 3 Colt 42.3%
6211 86
1.9% Rather not
78▼ 3 Glowy 42.8%
947 58
0.3% Rather not
79▼ 1 Mico 41.2%
1177 61
0.4% Rather not
80 Alli 40.8%
1285 62
0.4% Rather not
81 Meeple 40.7%
1494 65
0.5% Rather not
82 Rosa 39.7%
4116 80
1.2% Rather not
83▲ 1 Lola 39.7%
1505 65
0.5% Rather not
84▼ 1 Bea 39.0%
1918 68
0.6% Rather not
85 Grom 38.5%
1552 65
0.5% Rather not
86▲ 2 8-Bit 37.1%
2274 71
0.7% Rather not
87▲ 2 Pam 37.0%
1779 67
0.5% Rather not
88▼ 2 Brock 36.8%
4266 80
1.3% Rather not
89▲ 1 Eve 36.7%
877 57
0.3% Rather not
90▼ 3 Penny 36.3%
1934 68
0.6% Rather not
91 Poco 35.9%
3966 79
1.2% Rather not
92 Bonnie 35.4%
1408 64
0.4% Rather not
93▲ 6 Janet 34.8%
784 55
0.2% Rather not
94▲ 1 Byron 34.8%
1333 63
0.4% Rather not
95▼ 2 Nani 34.9%
1957 69
0.6% Rather not
96 Belle 33.9%
1058 59
0.3% Rather not
97▲ 1 Gray 33.9%
1221 62
0.4% Rather not
98▼ 1 Mandy 33.8%
1449 64
0.4% Rather not
99▼ 5 Najia 33.1%
701 53
0.2% Rather not
100 Mr. P 33.5%
1328 63
0.4% Rather not
101▲ 1 Barley 32.6%
3086 75
0.9% Rather not
102▼ 1 Gus 32.0%
1742 67
0.5% Rather not
103 Gene 28.9%
1277 62
0.4% Rather not
104▲ 1 Chuck 25.3%
778 55
0.2% Rather not
105▲ 1 Angelo 24.6%
763 54
0.2% Rather not
106▼ 2 Piper 25.5%
1183 61
0.4% Rather not