
Brawl Ball
55,163 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 40 of 105 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
Nothing noticeably underrated.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 9,697 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 1,266 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 9,697 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 1,266 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (741 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Bibi |
63.2% | 14357 | 98 | 4.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Emz |
61.1% | 5701 | 85 | 1.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Frank |
60.0% | 9775 | 93 | 3.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Edgar |
59.5% | 10626 | 94 | 3.2% | Good pick | ||
| 5 | – | Griff |
59.2% | 6510 | 87 | 2.0% | Good pick | ||
| 6 | – | Spike |
57.8% | 4438 | 81 | 1.3% | Good pick | ||
| 7 | – | Clancy |
57.1% | 2645 | 73 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 8 | ▲ 1 | Damian |
56.5% | 4346 | 81 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 9 | ▼ 1 | Sirius |
56.4% | 2831 | 74 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 10 | – | Kenji |
55.6% | 4816 | 82 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 11 | – | Gale |
55.6% | 4092 | 80 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 12 | – | Surge |
54.0% | 6826 | 87 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 13 | – | Tara |
54.2% | 3541 | 77 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 14 | ▲ 3 | Hank |
54.2% | 2611 | 73 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 15 | ▼ 1 | Ash |
53.9% | 2898 | 74 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 16 | ▼ 1 | Melodie |
53.8% | 2652 | 73 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 17 | ▼ 1 | Max |
53.3% | 4048 | 79 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 18 | – | Bull |
52.3% | 11445 | 95 | 3.5% | Solid | ||
| 19 | – | Jacky |
52.6% | 4837 | 82 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 20 | – | Dynamike |
52.4% | 5736 | 85 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 21 | – | Buzz |
51.9% | 4993 | 83 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 22 | – | Fang |
51.9% | 4650 | 82 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 23 | – | Nita |
51.6% | 6699 | 87 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 24 | ▲ 1 | Sam |
52.1% | 2489 | 72 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 25 | ▼ 1 | Darryl |
51.2% | 6258 | 86 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 26 | – | Draco |
52.1% | 1841 | 68 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 27 | – | Cordelius |
51.3% | 3633 | 78 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 28 | ▲ 5 | Doug |
51.2% | 3485 | 77 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 29 | ▲ 2 | Shade |
51.0% | 3866 | 79 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 30 | ▲ 2 | El Primo |
50.4% | 9373 | 92 | 2.8% | Rather not | ||
| 31 | ▼ 2 | Ollie |
52.2% | 1318 | 63 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 32 | ▼ 4 | Trunk |
51.3% | 2676 | 73 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 33 | ▲ 2 | Crow |
50.9% | 3240 | 76 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 34 | ▲ 2 | Rico |
50.1% | 7312 | 88 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 35 | ▼ 5 | Starr Nova |
50.6% | 2960 | 75 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 36 | ▼ 2 | Pearl |
50.8% | 2185 | 70 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 37 | ▲ 6 | Nori |
50.8% | 1825 | 68 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 38 | ▼ 1 | Jae-Yong |
51.5% | 1002 | 59 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 39 | ▼ 1 | Maisie |
50.2% | 2757 | 74 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 40 | ▼ 1 | Chester |
49.7% | 4495 | 81 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 41 | – | Colette |
49.7% | 4187 | 80 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 42 | ▲ 1 | Wendy |
76.3% | 38 | 10 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 43 | ▼ 2 | Larry & Lawrie |
50.1% | 1940 | 68 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 44 | ▼ 2 | Mortis |
48.7% | 7987 | 90 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 45 | – | Shelly |
48.1% | 9589 | 92 | 2.9% | Rather not | ||
| 46 | – | Lumi |
49.4% | 1727 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 47 | – | Lou |
49.3% | 1813 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | ▲ 2 | Carl |
48.5% | 3386 | 77 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | ▲ 3 | Bo |
48.7% | 2292 | 71 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▼ 1 | Buster |
48.9% | 1715 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▼ 3 | Moe |
49.0% | 1449 | 64 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▲ 3 | Mina |
48.3% | 2363 | 71 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 2 | Otis |
48.1% | 2176 | 70 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | – | Tick |
47.9% | 2249 | 71 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▲ 2 | Kit |
47.6% | 2574 | 73 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | – | Squeak |
47.5% | 1951 | 69 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▲ 5 | Gigi |
47.8% | 1331 | 63 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▲ 2 | Willow |
47.2% | 2338 | 71 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | – | R-T |
47.5% | 1178 | 61 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▲ 1 | Stu |
46.3% | 4902 | 82 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▼ 8 | Charlie |
47.3% | 1219 | 61 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 1 | Berry |
47.0% | 1622 | 66 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 5 | Leon |
46.5% | 2616 | 73 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▲ 2 | Jessie |
46.2% | 2533 | 72 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▲ 4 | Meg |
45.9% | 2766 | 74 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 1 | Pierce |
46.3% | 1076 | 60 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 2 | Bolt |
45.8% | 1801 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 3 | Juju |
46.4% | 886 | 57 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▲ 3 | Amber |
45.7% | 1796 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 6 | Sprout |
45.4% | 1336 | 63 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 3 | Sandy |
45.1% | 1769 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 2 | Ziggy |
44.8% | 801 | 55 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 6 | Finx |
43.6% | 1084 | 60 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 2 | Ruffs |
43.5% | 1443 | 64 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 2 | Lily |
43.2% | 1792 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▲ 1 | Kaze |
43.0% | 2096 | 70 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 3 | Colt |
42.3% | 6211 | 86 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 3 | Glowy |
42.8% | 947 | 58 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 1 | Mico |
41.2% | 1177 | 61 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | – | Alli |
40.8% | 1285 | 62 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – | Meeple |
40.7% | 1494 | 65 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Rosa |
39.7% | 4116 | 80 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 1 | Lola |
39.7% | 1505 | 65 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 1 | Bea |
39.0% | 1918 | 68 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – | Grom |
38.5% | 1552 | 65 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 2 | 8-Bit |
37.1% | 2274 | 71 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 2 | Pam |
37.0% | 1779 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 2 | Brock |
36.8% | 4266 | 80 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 1 | Eve |
36.7% | 877 | 57 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 3 | Penny |
36.3% | 1934 | 68 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Poco |
35.9% | 3966 | 79 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Bonnie |
35.4% | 1408 | 64 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 6 | Janet |
34.8% | 784 | 55 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 1 | Byron |
34.8% | 1333 | 63 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 2 | Nani |
34.9% | 1957 | 69 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Belle |
33.9% | 1058 | 59 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▲ 1 | Gray |
33.9% | 1221 | 62 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 1 | Mandy |
33.8% | 1449 | 64 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▼ 5 | Najia |
33.1% | 701 | 53 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Mr. P |
33.5% | 1328 | 63 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 1 | Barley |
32.6% | 3086 | 75 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 1 | Gus |
32.0% | 1742 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Gene |
28.9% | 1277 | 62 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▲ 1 | Chuck |
25.3% | 778 | 55 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▲ 1 | Angelo |
24.6% | 763 | 54 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | ▼ 2 | Piper |
25.5% | 1183 | 61 | 0.4% | Rather not |