My roster

Enter your player tag and the site hides everything you cannot play anyway: brawlers you are missing, and those below power 9 — below 11 from Mythic upwards. The tag goes to the official API once and then stays in your browser. It is neither stored nor logged here, and there is no account.

You can find your tag in the game, under your name in your profile.

EN
Brawl Ball

No Good Deed

55,378 battles collected on this map.

TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 40 of 105 brawlers above 50%.

Trophy Road
No Good DeedBrawl Ball

Recommendation

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean
Strong pick Good pick SolidThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Brawl Ball): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.
TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.
Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 3,314 real line-ups.

1
77.0% expected
2
77.0% expected
3
77.0% expected
4
77.0% expected
5
76.9% expected
6
76.9% expected
How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 3,314 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (322 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#BrawlerWin rateGamesTrustPick rateRating
1 Bibi 63.2%
14404 98
4.3% Strong pick
2 Emz 61.2%
5725 85
1.7% Strong pick
3 Frank 60.0%
9827 93
3.0% Strong pick
4 Edgar 59.5%
10668 94
3.2% Good pick
5 Griff 59.2%
6540 87
2.0% Good pick
6 Spike 57.8%
4451 81
1.3% Good pick
7 Clancy 57.1%
2658 73
0.8% Solid
8▲ 1 Damian 56.5%
4357 81
1.3% Solid
9▼ 1 Sirius 56.5%
2841 74
0.9% Solid
10 Kenji 55.6%
4824 82
1.5% Solid
11 Gale 55.7%
4104 80
1.2% Solid
12 Surge 54.0%
6850 87
2.1% Solid
13 Tara 54.1%
3550 77
1.1% Solid
14▲ 3 Hank 54.1%
2623 73
0.8% Solid
15▼ 1 Ash 53.8%
2911 75
0.9% Solid
16▼ 1 Melodie 53.8%
2667 73
0.8% Solid
17▼ 1 Max 53.3%
4068 80
1.2% Solid
18 Bull 52.3%
11490 95
3.5% Solid
19 Jacky 52.6%
4851 82
1.5% Solid
20 Dynamike 52.3%
5755 85
1.7% Solid
21 Buzz 51.8%
5007 83
1.5% Rather not
22▲ 1 Fang 51.9%
4661 82
1.4% Rather not
23▼ 1 Nita 51.6%
6730 87
2.0% Rather not
24▲ 1 Sam 52.1%
2495 72
0.8% Rather not
25▼ 1 Darryl 51.2%
6281 86
1.9% Rather not
26 Draco 52.1%
1849 68
0.6% Rather not
27 Cordelius 51.3%
3648 78
1.1% Rather not
28▲ 5 Doug 51.2%
3494 77
1.1% Rather not
29▲ 2 El Primo 50.5%
9414 92
2.8% Rather not
30▲ 2 Shade 51.0%
3884 79
1.2% Rather not
31▼ 3 Trunk 51.3%
2686 73
0.8% Rather not
32▼ 3 Ollie 52.2%
1323 63
0.4% Rather not
33▲ 2 Crow 51.0%
3258 76
1.0% Rather not
34▲ 2 Rico 50.1%
7332 88
2.2% Rather not
35▼ 5 Starr Nova 50.7%
2974 75
0.9% Rather not
36▼ 2 Pearl 50.8%
2195 70
0.7% Rather not
37▲ 6 Nori 50.8%
1832 68
0.6% Rather not
38▼ 1 Jae-Yong 51.5%
1007 59
0.3% Rather not
39▼ 1 Maisie 50.2%
2763 74
0.8% Rather not
40▼ 1 Chester 49.8%
4510 81
1.4% Rather not
41 Colette 49.7%
4203 80
1.3% Rather not
42▼ 2 Larry & Lawrie 50.1%
1949 69
0.6% Rather not
43▲ 1 Wendy 76.3%
38 10
0.0% Rather not
44▼ 2 Mortis 48.8%
8020 90
2.4% Rather not
45▲ 1 Lumi 49.5%
1737 67
0.5% Rather not
46▼ 1 Shelly 48.1%
9629 92
2.9% Rather not
47 Lou 49.2%
1820 67
0.5% Rather not
48▲ 4 Carl 48.4%
3396 77
1.0% Rather not
49▲ 1 Bo 48.8%
2301 71
0.7% Rather not
50▼ 1 Buster 48.9%
1719 67
0.5% Rather not
51▼ 3 Moe 49.0%
1456 64
0.4% Rather not
52▲ 3 Mina 48.3%
2367 71
0.7% Rather not
53▼ 2 Otis 48.1%
2180 70
0.7% Rather not
54 Tick 48.0%
2263 71
0.7% Rather not
55▲ 2 Kit 47.6%
2581 73
0.8% Rather not
56 Squeak 47.5%
1962 69
0.6% Rather not
57▲ 2 Willow 47.3%
2349 71
0.7% Rather not
58▲ 4 Gigi 47.7%
1335 63
0.4% Rather not
59▼ 1 R-T 47.7%
1184 61
0.4% Rather not
60▼ 7 Charlie 47.3%
1225 62
0.4% Rather not
61 Stu 46.3%
4929 82
1.5% Rather not
62▲ 1 Berry 46.9%
1629 66
0.5% Rather not
63▼ 3 Leon 46.5%
2622 73
0.8% Rather not
64▲ 2 Jessie 46.2%
2546 73
0.8% Rather not
65▲ 3 Meg 45.9%
2774 74
0.8% Rather not
66▼ 1 Bolt 46.0%
1812 67
0.5% Rather not
67▲ 4 Juju 46.4%
890 57
0.3% Rather not
68▲ 1 Pierce 46.2%
1083 60
0.3% Rather not
69▲ 3 Amber 45.7%
1799 67
0.5% Rather not
70▼ 6 Sprout 45.5%
1344 63
0.4% Rather not
71▼ 4 Sandy 45.2%
1774 67
0.5% Rather not
72▼ 2 Ziggy 44.8%
802 55
0.2% Rather not
73▲ 6 Finx 43.6%
1086 60
0.3% Rather not
74▲ 2 Ruffs 43.4%
1446 64
0.4% Rather not
75▼ 2 Lily 43.2%
1798 67
0.5% Rather not
76▲ 1 Kaze 42.9%
2105 70
0.6% Rather not
77▼ 3 Colt 42.3%
6233 86
1.9% Rather not
78▼ 3 Glowy 42.9%
952 58
0.3% Rather not
79▼ 1 Mico 41.1%
1179 61
0.4% Rather not
80▲ 1 Meeple 40.8%
1499 65
0.5% Rather not
81▼ 1 Alli 40.7%
1291 62
0.4% Rather not
82 Rosa 39.7%
4135 80
1.2% Rather not
83▲ 1 Lola 39.8%
1511 65
0.5% Rather not
84▼ 1 Bea 39.0%
1931 68
0.6% Rather not
85 Grom 38.4%
1558 65
0.5% Rather not
86▲ 2 8-Bit 37.1%
2283 71
0.7% Rather not
87▼ 1 Brock 36.9%
4284 80
1.3% Rather not
88▲ 2 Eve 36.8%
880 57
0.3% Rather not
89 Pam 36.9%
1785 67
0.5% Rather not
90▼ 3 Penny 36.3%
1943 68
0.6% Rather not
91 Poco 35.9%
3982 79
1.2% Rather not
92 Bonnie 35.3%
1413 64
0.4% Rather not
93▲ 6 Janet 34.8%
788 55
0.2% Rather not
94▲ 1 Byron 34.8%
1337 63
0.4% Rather not
95▼ 2 Nani 34.8%
1966 69
0.6% Rather not
96 Belle 33.9%
1061 59
0.3% Rather not
97▲ 1 Gray 33.9%
1224 62
0.4% Rather not
98▼ 1 Mandy 33.8%
1460 64
0.4% Rather not
99▼ 5 Najia 33.0%
705 53
0.2% Rather not
100 Mr. P 33.6%
1335 63
0.4% Rather not
101▲ 1 Barley 32.5%
3098 75
0.9% Rather not
102▼ 1 Gus 32.3%
1754 67
0.5% Rather not
103 Gene 28.8%
1280 62
0.4% Rather not
104▲ 1 Chuck 25.3%
779 55
0.2% Rather not
105▲ 1 Angelo 24.9%
768 55
0.2% Rather not
106▼ 2 Piper 25.7%
1194 61
0.4% Rather not