Knockout

Opening Move

158,495 battles collected on this map.

OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 84 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 5355 games

Damage Dealer 2410 games

Controller 4845 games

Controller 2454 games

Damage Dealer 5858 games

Controller 2828 games

Controller 8715 games

Damage Dealer 2258 games

Controller 6198 games

Damage Dealer 2487 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Knockout): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Jae-Yong 65.4%Winrate 1,884 games

R-T 64.8%Winrate 2,410 games

Otis 63.1%Winrate 4,845 games

Gigi 63.1%Winrate 3,035 games

Overrated

Edgar 32.5%Winrate 71,794 games

Piper 43.8%Winrate 56,980 games

Colt 33.4%Winrate 42,109 games

Brock 45.7%Winrate 49,127 games

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 9,842 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 3,639 real line-ups.

82.5% expected

82.4% expected

82.1% expected

82.0% expected

82.0% expected

81.7% expected

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 9,842 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 3,639 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (8 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Wendy	76.1%	20001	100	1.7%	Strong pick
2	–	Bolt	68.6%	9514	92	0.9%	Strong pick
3	–	Pearl	68.3%	5355	84	0.6%	Strong pick
4	–	Nori	65.3%	44324	100	4.5%	Strong pick
5	–	Starr Nova	63.6%	9883	93	0.9%	Strong pick
6	–	Pierce	63.3%	15087	99	1.4%	Strong pick
7	▲ 2	Jae-Yong	65.4%	1884	68	0.2%	Strong pick
8	▼ 1	R-T	64.8%	2410	72	0.2%	Strong pick
9	▼ 1	Meeple	63.2%	8366	90	0.8%	Strong pick
10	–	Najia	62.9%	7278	88	0.7%	Strong pick
11	–	Gray	62.2%	15785	100	1.5%	Strong pick
12	▲ 1	Otis	63.1%	4845	82	0.4%	Strong pick
13	▼ 1	Mina	62.3%	8384	90	0.9%	Strong pick
14	–	Gigi	63.1%	3035	75	0.3%	Strong pick
15	▲ 1	Sprout	61.8%	7415	88	0.6%	Strong pick
16	▼ 1	Meg	62.0%	5699	85	0.6%	Strong pick
17	▲ 1	Ash	63.2%	1965	69	0.2%	Good pick
18	▼ 1	Charlie	62.7%	2454	72	0.2%	Good pick
19	▲ 1	Chester	61.3%	5858	85	0.6%	Good pick
20	▲ 2	Lou	62.1%	2828	74	0.3%	Good pick
21	–	Ziggy	62.3%	2416	72	0.2%	Good pick
22	▼ 3	Sirius	61.6%	3537	77	0.3%	Good pick
23	▲ 2	Griff	60.7%	8715	91	0.9%	Good pick
24	–	Glowy	61.7%	2945	75	0.3%	Good pick
25	▼ 2	Moe	62.0%	2258	71	0.2%	Good pick
26	–	Ruffs	61.4%	3194	76	0.3%	Good pick
27	▲ 1	Shade	60.6%	4059	79	0.5%	Good pick
28	▲ 5	Trunk	62.2%	1519	65	0.2%	Good pick
29	–	Bo	60.1%	6198	86	0.7%	Good pick
30	▼ 3	Cordelius	60.6%	3490	77	0.3%	Good pick
31	▼ 1	Damian	61.8%	1624	66	0.2%	Good pick
32	▼ 1	Mico	60.0%	3980	79	0.3%	Good pick
33	▲ 1	Lumi	60.6%	2487	72	0.2%	Good pick
34	▼ 2	Kit	59.0%	10377	94	0.9%	Good pick
35	–	Gus	58.9%	10681	94	1.1%	Good pick
36	▲ 2	Stu	58.6%	9631	92	1.1%	Good pick
37	▲ 4	Finx	60.0%	2345	71	0.2%	Good pick
38	▼ 2	Buster	60.8%	1528	65	0.1%	Good pick
39	▼ 2	Kaze	58.9%	4989	83	0.5%	Good pick
40	▼ 1	Belle	58.2%	8313	90	0.8%	Solid
41	▼ 1	Doug	59.2%	2849	74	0.3%	Solid
42	–	Angelo	58.4%	5278	83	0.5%	Solid
43	▲ 6	Squeak	58.0%	7716	89	0.8%	Solid
44	–	Mr. P	59.0%	2686	73	0.2%	Solid
45	▲ 6	Eve	59.6%	1783	67	0.1%	Solid
46	▲ 1	Janet	58.9%	2758	74	0.2%	Solid
47	▼ 4	Alli	59.0%	2448	72	0.2%	Solid
48	▼ 3	Lily	57.7%	8345	90	0.8%	Solid
49	▼ 3	Mandy	57.3%	18438	100	1.6%	Solid
50	▲ 2	Kenji	57.7%	7610	89	0.7%	Solid
51	▼ 3	Gene	57.9%	5511	84	0.5%	Solid
52	▲ 1	Willow	58.7%	2413	72	0.2%	Solid
53	▲ 1	Juju	60.1%	1170	61	0.1%	Solid
54	▲ 5	Jacky	59.2%	1636	66	0.2%	Solid
55	▼ 5	Draco	60.2%	1031	59	0.1%	Solid
56	–	Nani	57.1%	7791	89	0.8%	Solid
57	▲ 1	Amber	58.0%	2953	75	0.3%	Solid
58	▼ 1	Maisie	57.8%	3231	76	0.3%	Solid
59	▼ 4	Clancy	60.7%	782	55	0.1%	Solid
60	–	Sandy	58.2%	2310	71	0.2%	Solid
61	–	Larry & Lawrie	57.9%	2713	73	0.3%	Solid
62	▲ 3	Berry	57.7%	2109	70	0.2%	Solid
63	▼ 1	Gale	57.4%	2550	73	0.3%	Solid
64	–	Fang	55.9%	10981	94	1.2%	Solid
65	▲ 2	Mortis	55.5%	18315	100	2.0%	Solid
66	▼ 1	Lola	57.2%	2203	70	0.2%	Solid
67	▲ 2	Buzz	56.5%	3758	78	0.4%	Solid
68	▼ 5	Ollie	59.0%	897	57	0.1%	Solid
69	–	Bonnie	56.2%	3238	76	0.3%	Solid
70	–	Penny	55.7%	4783	82	0.5%	Solid
71	–	Grom	55.9%	3664	78	0.3%	Solid
72	–	Max	54.8%	10364	94	1.1%	Solid
73	–	Melodie	55.9%	1760	67	0.2%	Solid
74	–	Hank	55.1%	1702	66	0.2%	Solid
75	▲ 1	Tick	53.2%	10492	94	1.0%	Rather not
76	▼ 1	Sam	55.1%	1425	64	0.1%	Rather not
77	–	Carl	52.8%	8013	90	0.9%	Rather not
78	–	Byron	52.2%	23655	100	2.3%	Rather not
79	–	Surge	52.5%	10039	93	0.9%	Rather not
80	–	Tara	52.5%	4219	80	0.5%	Rather not
81	–	Bea	51.4%	10615	94	1.0%	Rather not
82	–	Chuck	53.3%	974	58	0.1%	Rather not
83	–	Pam	51.5%	1749	67	0.2%	Rather not
84	–	Poco	50.0%	5666	84	0.6%	Rather not
85	–	Barley	49.1%	3503	77	0.4%	Rather not
86	–	Bull	48.8%	4225	80	0.5%	Rather not
87	–	Darryl	48.4%	5025	83	0.6%	Rather not
88	–	Rosa	47.6%	2461	72	0.3%	Rather not
89	–	Brock	45.7%	49127	100	5.0%	Rather not
90	–	Bibi	46.2%	5999	85	0.7%	Rather not
91	–	Jessie	46.2%	4975	83	0.6%	Rather not
92	–	Colette	45.8%	10116	93	1.1%	Rather not
93	–	Dynamike	44.4%	12241	96	1.3%	Rather not
94	–	Piper	43.8%	56980	100	5.6%	Rather not
95	–	Leon	43.8%	19487	100	2.0%	Rather not
96	–	Spike	43.7%	14064	98	1.7%	Rather not
97	–	Emz	39.5%	15658	100	1.9%	Rather not
98	–	Frank	38.3%	7205	88	0.9%	Rather not
99	–	Crow	37.0%	20318	100	2.2%	Rather not
100	–	8-Bit	36.4%	22839	100	2.8%	Rather not
101	–	Nita	36.3%	7202	88	0.9%	Rather not
102	–	Rico	34.4%	35086	100	4.3%	Rather not
103	–	Colt	33.4%	42109	100	5.1%	Rather not
104	–	Edgar	32.5%	71794	100	8.4%	Rather not
105	–	El Primo	28.0%	11488	95	1.6%	Rather not
106	–	Shelly	26.9%	17789	100	2.3%	Rather not